Ludmilla vs Parap
In Ludmilla, most households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Parap, most households rent and most homes are flats or apartments. Houses cost more in Parap: a median of $1.03 million, against $778,000 in Ludmilla, and rent is higher there too. Parap is closer to the city centre: 5.3 km, against 8.8 km. On these figures, Ludmilla tends to suit buyers on a tighter budget, while Parap suits renters and people living alone.
Parap is the larger and more established suburb, with a population of 2819 compared to Ludmilla's 1667, and it scores notably higher on liveability (72 versus 53) and walkability (64 versus 43). Parap is also closer to the CBD at 5.3 km and has a higher median household income of $116012, though housing costs are considerably steeper—median house prices sit at $985000 versus $750000 in Ludmilla. If you prioritise walkability, proximity to the city, and a more affluent neighbourhood feel, Parap suits you better; Ludmilla appeals to those seeking lower property prices and a quieter, more affordable rental market, with weekly rents at $300 compared to Parap's $415.
Written by an AI language model from the figures below. Every number in it is checked against those figures before it is published.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
They split
one each way, out of the 5 things we measure here
- Ludmilla has more separate houses rather than flats (76% vs 31%)
- Parap has more schools rated above their peers (1 vs 0)
Weighs schools, house stock, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Ludmilla
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has cheaper houses ($777,500 vs $1,030,000)
- has cheaper units ($380,000 vs $448,750)
Weighs house prices, unit prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
They split
one each way, out of the 3 things we measure here
- Ludmilla has cheaper rent ($300/wk vs $415/wk)
- Parap has a bigger rental market to choose from (63% vs 44%)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Parap
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- sits closer to the CBD (5.3 km vs 8.8 km)
- is more walkable (64/100 vs 45/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Parap
ahead on 2 of the 4 things we measure here
- has more units and townhouses to downsize into (69% vs 24%)
- is more walkable (64/100 vs 45/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, and walkability.
Investors
They split
one each way, out of the 2 things we measure here
- Ludmilla returns a higher gross yield on houses (5.5% vs 3.7%)
- Parap is growing faster (2.6% vs -4.4%)
Weighs house yield and population growth.
Where they sit
Ludmilla and Parap drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Parap has more residents (2,819 vs 1,667); Parap rents higher ($415/wk vs $300/wk).
| Ludmilla | Parap | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,667 | 2,819 +69% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | -4.4% | +2.6% |
| Median age | 35 | 36 |
| Median household income | $106,912/yr | $116,012/yr +9% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $300/wk | $415/wk +38% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (21.1%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (4.0%).
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (20.4%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Ludmilla | Parap | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $777,500 | $1,030,000 |
| Median unit price | $380,000 | $448,750 |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 18 days from 18 sales | 26 days from 11 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
30 vs 9 sales
25 vs 10 sales
Development activity
| Ludmilla | Parap | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 171 across Darwin same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +47% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Ludmilla | Parap | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 5.5% $950/wk on $900K | 3.7% $750/wk on $1.05M |
| Units | — | 7.5% $628/wk on $435K |
Ranking within NT
| Ludmilla | Parap | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 69% of NT | Higher than 78% of NT |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 82% of NT | Higher than 90% of NT |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 99% of NT | Higher than 95% of NT |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 94% of NT | Higher than 80% of NT |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 67% of NT | Higher than 5% of NT |
| Rental yield (units) | — | Higher than 81% of NT |
Liveability
Parap scores higher overall (84 vs 55); Parap is more walkable (64 vs 45).
| Ludmilla | Parap | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | B | A |
| Score | 55/100 | 84/100 |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 5/10 | very advantaged area decile 9/10 |
Risk profile
| Ludmilla | Parap | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Crime | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | Low 14/100 | None 0/100 |
| Aircraft noise | High 83/100 | None 0/100 |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 5 within 5 km | 4 within 5 km |
Schools
| Ludmilla | Parap | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 1 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 | 1 |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 1 | 0 |
| Universities within 10 km | 2 Danala Education and Community Precinct, 5.5 km | 2 Danala Education and Community Precinct, 3.4 km |
| Full-time students aged 15–24 | 0.7% | 1.3% |
Schools in Ludmilla
- Ludmilla Primary School Government · Primary below peers
Schools in Parap
- Parap Primary School Government · Primary above peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Ludmilla | Parap | |
|---|---|---|
| Cafes & restaurants | 0 | 8 |
| Parks & reserves | 5 | 9 |
| Childcare | 2 | 4 |
| GPs | 1 | 0 |
| Pharmacies | 1 same for both | |
| Police stations | 0 | 1 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 0 | 1 |
| Fuel stations | 2 | 1 |
| Waterways | 3 | 0 |
Mobility
Ludmilla sits further from the CBD (8.8 km vs 5.3 km).
| Ludmilla | Parap | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 45/100 | 64/100 |
| Distance to Darwin | 8.8 km +40% vs other | 5.3 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 14 min | 10 min |
| Public transport score | 69/100 Bus | 92/100 Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 15.8 7-9am + 5-7pm | 56.2 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 1 min scheduled, not actual same for both | |
| Electric vehicle share | 1.1% postcode 0820 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 19 postcode 0820 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (77.9%).
Setting
| Ludmilla | Parap | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 6 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 22 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 1.1 km 1.9 km to a named beach | 1.1 km 1.2 km to a named beach |
NBN connectivity
| Ludmilla | Parap | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 100/100 | 98/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the premises same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 100% 670 premises | 94% 1,441 premises |
Climate
| Ludmilla | Parap | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 1,836 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 32.5°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 19.8°C same for both | |
Council rates
| Ludmilla | Parap | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,870/yr same for both | |
| Council | Darwin same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Ludmilla | Parap | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Solomon same for both | |
| Member | Luke John Gosling same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Ludmilla | Parap | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $50,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | — same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Ludmilla
Other comparisons with Parap
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.