Lower Wilmot vs Paloona
Paloona is the younger of the two, with a median age of 40 against 50 in Lower Wilmot. In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Lower Wilmot, about half of households are couple families. In Paloona, the large majority of households are couple families. On these figures, Lower Wilmot tends to suit people living alone, while Paloona suits couples.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Paloona
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is already more of a family suburb (76% vs 61%)
Weighs schools, house stock, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Lower Wilmot
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($260/wk vs $335/wk)
Weighs rent and rental stress.
Commuting to the city
Paloona
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- sits closer to the CBD (289.2 km vs 307.5 km)
- has a shorter drive in (210 min vs 222 min)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Too close to call
Nothing among the 3 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, and walkability.
Investors
Paloona
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (31.2% vs 18.3%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Lower Wilmot and Paloona drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Lower Wilmot has more residents (136 vs 84); Paloona rents higher ($335/wk vs $260/wk).
| Lower Wilmot | Paloona | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 136 +38% vs other | 84 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +18.3% | +31.2% |
| Median age | 50 | 40 |
| Median household income | $66,612/yr | $82,316/yr +24% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $260/wk | $335/wk +29% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (19.9%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (4.8%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (23.8%).
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Zoning mix
| Lower Wilmot | Paloona | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 96% | 97% |
| Environmental | 4% | 2% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 0% | 2% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Lower Wilmot | Paloona | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 19 across Kentish | 109 across Devonport |
| Approvals change year on year | — | +146% |
Ranking within TAS
| Lower Wilmot | Paloona | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 46% of TAS | Higher than 75% of TAS |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 55% of TAS | Higher than 30% of TAS |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 42% of TAS | Higher than 39% of TAS |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 32% of TAS | Higher than 59% of TAS |
Liveability
| Lower Wilmot | Paloona | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | high-need area decile 1/10 | mid-range socio-economic decile 6/10 |
Risk profile
Paloona carries more bushfire risk (27 vs 0).
| Lower Wilmot | Paloona | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 | Low 27/100 |
| Crime | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Lower Wilmot | Paloona | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Lower Wilmot | Paloona | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 0 |
| Waterways | 2 same for both | |
Mobility
Lower Wilmot sits further from the CBD (307.5 km vs 289.2 km).
| Lower Wilmot | Paloona | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 same for both | |
| Distance to Hobart | 307.5 km +6% vs other | 289.2 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 222 min | 210 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.4% postcode 7310 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 23 postcode 7310 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (87.5%).
Setting
| Lower Wilmot | Paloona | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 246 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 101 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 18.0 km | 11.7 km |
NBN connectivity
| Lower Wilmot | Paloona | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 26/100 | 30/100 |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 50 premises | 0% 33 premises |
Climate
| Lower Wilmot | Paloona | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 814 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | — same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | — same for both | |
Council rates
| Lower Wilmot | Paloona | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,299/yr | $1,501/yr |
| Council | Kentish | Devonport |
Federal electorate
| Lower Wilmot | Paloona | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Lyons | Braddon |
| Member | Rebecca White | Anne Urquhart |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Lower Wilmot | Paloona | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $20,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | — same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Lower Wilmot
Other comparisons with Paloona
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.