Lower Southgate vs Southgate
In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Lower Southgate, about half of households are people living alone. Houses cost more in Lower Southgate: a median of $1.66 million, against $1.2 million in Southgate, though rent is higher in Southgate. On these figures, Lower Southgate tends to suit couples, while Southgate suits buyers on a tighter budget.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Lower Southgate
ahead on 2 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more parks and reserves (4 vs 0)
- carries lower crime risk (63/100 vs 75/100)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Southgate
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper houses ($1,200,000 vs $1,660,000)
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
Lower Southgate
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- leaves renters under less rental stress (12% vs 23%)
- has cheaper rent ($180/wk vs $300/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Southgate
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- sits closer to the CBD (625.1 km vs 637.6 km)
- has a shorter drive in (419 min vs 427 min)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Lower Southgate
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- carries lower crime risk (63/100 vs 75/100)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Southgate
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (7.6% vs -0.9%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Lower Southgate and Southgate drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Southgate has more residents (198 vs 112); Southgate rents higher ($300/wk vs $180/wk).
| Lower Southgate | Southgate | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 112 | 198 +77% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | -0.9% | +7.6% |
| Median age | 52 | 51 |
| Median household income | $74,724/yr +8% vs other | $68,692/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $180/wk | $300/wk +67% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (21.4%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (4.5%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (24.1%).
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Lower Southgate | Southgate | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,660,000 | $1,200,000 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
Zoning mix
Southgate has more rural and farming land (94% vs 63%); Lower Southgate has more land zoned for conservation (37% vs 6%).
| Lower Southgate | Southgate | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 63% | 94% |
| Environmental | 37% | 6% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Lower Southgate | Southgate | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 246 across Clarence Valley same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -80% same for both | |
Ranking within NSW
| Lower Southgate | Southgate | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 88% of NSW | Higher than 42% of NSW |
| Income | Higher than 42% of NSW | Higher than 32% of NSW |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 56% of NSW | Higher than 59% of NSW |
| Affordability | Higher than 5% of NSW | Higher than 45% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 17% of NSW | Higher than 18% of NSW |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 52% of NSW | Higher than 61% of NSW |
Liveability
| Lower Southgate | Southgate | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 4/10 same for both | |
Risk profile
Lower Southgate carries more bushfire risk (57 vs 15); Southgate carries more crime risk (75 vs 63).
| Lower Southgate | Southgate | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Moderate 57/100 | Low 15/100 |
| Crime | Moderate 63/100 | High 75/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Lower Southgate | Southgate | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Lower Southgate | Southgate | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 4 | 0 |
| Childcare | 0 | 1 |
| Waterways | 18 | 13 |
Mobility
Lower Southgate sits further from the CBD (637.6 km vs 625.1 km).
| Lower Southgate | Southgate | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 10/100 | 11/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 637.6 km +2% vs other | 625.1 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 427 min | 419 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.2% postcode 2460 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 60 postcode 2460 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (73.7%).
Setting
| Lower Southgate | Southgate | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 3 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 20 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 25.7 km | 31.0 km |
NBN connectivity
| Lower Southgate | Southgate | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 30/100 same for both | |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 57 premises | 0% 84 premises |
Climate
| Lower Southgate | Southgate | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 1,060 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 30.0°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 8.3°C same for both | |
Council rates
| Lower Southgate | Southgate | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,380/yr same for both | |
| Council | Clarence Valley same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Lower Southgate | Southgate | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Page same for both | |
| Member | Kevin Hogan same for both | |
| Party | The Nationals same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Lower Southgate | Southgate | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Lower Southgate
Other comparisons with Southgate
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.