Lower Mitcham vs Torrens Park
In both, the large majority of households own their home, most homes are detached houses, and about half of households are couple families. Houses cost more in Lower Mitcham: a median of $1.57 million, against $1.41 million in Torrens Park.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Lower Mitcham
ahead on 2 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more parks and reserves (3 vs 0)
- carries lower crime risk (21/100 vs 56/100)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Torrens Park
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has cheaper units ($605,500 vs $860,000)
- has cheaper houses ($1,405,000 vs $1,575,000)
Weighs house prices, unit prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Too close to call
Nothing among the 3 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Lower Mitcham
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is more walkable (87/100 vs 54/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Lower Mitcham
ahead on 2 of the 5 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (21/100 vs 56/100)
- is more walkable (87/100 vs 54/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Lower Mitcham and Torrens Park drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Lower Mitcham skews older (45 vs 43).
| Lower Mitcham | Torrens Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,187 | 2,687 +23% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +1.6% | +3.5% |
| Median age | 45 | 43 |
| Median household income | $106,340/yr | $112,580/yr +6% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $346/wk +5% vs other | $330/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (15.3%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (24.5%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (6.0%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Lower Mitcham | Torrens Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,575,000 | $1,405,000 |
| Median unit price | $860,000 | $605,500 |
| Median land price | — | $1,425,000 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 35 days from 23 sales | 21 days from 16 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
18 vs 16 sales
17 vs 27 sales
5 vs 8 sales
Zoning mix
| Lower Mitcham | Torrens Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Residential | 96% | 90% |
| Environmental | 0% | 7% |
| Commercial | 4% | 3% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Lower Mitcham | Torrens Park | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 188 across Mitcham same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +32% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Lower Mitcham | Torrens Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | — same for both | |
| Units | — | 3.0% $440/wk on $770K |
Ranking within SA
| Lower Mitcham | Torrens Park | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 74% of SA | Higher than 94% of SA |
| Income | — | Higher than 88% of SA |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 96% of SA | Higher than 82% of SA |
| Affordability | — | Higher than 11% of SA |
| EV adoption | Higher than 97% of SA same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 98% of SA | Higher than 94% of SA |
| Rental yield (units) | — | Higher than 1% of SA |
Liveability
Lower Mitcham is more walkable (87 vs 54); Lower Mitcham scores higher overall (87 vs 68).
| Lower Mitcham | Torrens Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | A+ | A |
| Score | 87/100 | 68/100 |
| Socio-economic band | very advantaged area decile 10/10 same for both | |
Risk profile
Torrens Park carries more crime risk (56 vs 21); Torrens Park carries more flood risk (69 vs 59).
| Lower Mitcham | Torrens Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Crime | Low 21/100 | Moderate 56/100 |
| Flood | Moderate 59/100 | Moderate 69/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 4 within 5 km | 3 within 5 km |
Schools
| Lower Mitcham | Torrens Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 | 1 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 | 1 |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
| Universities within 10 km | 3 Tonsley, 3.7 km | 3 Tonsley, 4.2 km |
| Full-time students aged 15–24 | 3.5% | 4.1% |
Schools in Lower Mitcham
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Schools in Torrens Park
- Scotch College - Torrens Park Campus Independent · Combined at peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Lower Mitcham | Torrens Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 0 | 2 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 0 | 4 |
| Parks & reserves | 3 | 0 |
| GPs | 0 | 1 |
| Pharmacies | 0 | 2 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 0 | 1 |
| Fuel stations | 0 | 1 |
| Waterways | 0 | 9 |
Mobility
| Lower Mitcham | Torrens Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 87/100 | 54/100 |
| Distance to Adelaide | 7 km | 7.3 km +4% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 14 min same for both | |
| Public transport score | 80/100 Rail · Bus | 78/100 Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 15.5 7-9am + 5-7pm | 61.2 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 2 min scheduled, not actual | 1 min scheduled, not actual |
| Electric vehicle share | 2.5% postcode 5062 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 63 postcode 5062 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (68.4%).
Setting
| Lower Mitcham | Torrens Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 71 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 114 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 8.6 km | 9.3 km |
NBN connectivity
| Lower Mitcham | Torrens Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 98/100 | 83/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the premises | Hybrid fibre-coaxial |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 90% 957 premises | 34% 1,245 premises |
Climate
| Lower Mitcham | Torrens Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 457 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 29.1°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 8.5°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Lower Mitcham | Torrens Park | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 6.0 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 17.8 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 1.12 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Lower Mitcham | Torrens Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $2,296/yr same for both | |
| Council | Mitcham same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Lower Mitcham | Torrens Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Boothby same for both | |
| Member | Louise Miller-Frost same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Lower Mitcham | Torrens Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $15,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | — same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Lower Mitcham
Torrens Park
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Lower Mitcham
Other comparisons with Torrens Park
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.