Lovely Banks vs Norlane
In both, the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Lovely Banks, the large majority of households own their home and most households are couple families. In Norlane, most households rent and about half of households are people living alone. Houses cost more in Lovely Banks: a median of $780,000, against $535,000 in Norlane, and rent is higher there too. On these figures, Lovely Banks tends to suit couples, while Norlane suits renters, people living alone, and buyers on a tighter budget.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Norlane
ahead on 3 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more childcare (6 vs 1)
- has more parks and reserves (10 vs 2)
- has more schools inside the suburb (4 vs 1)
- But Lovely Banks is already more of a family suburb (73% vs 43%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
They split
one each way, out of the 4 things we measure here
- Lovely Banks leaves households under less mortgage stress (20% vs 30%)
- Norlane has cheaper land ($425,000 vs $758,750)
Weighs house prices, unit prices, land prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Norlane
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a bigger rental market to choose from (57% vs 14%)
- has cheaper rent ($250/wk vs $350/wk)
- But Lovely Banks leaves renters under less rental stress (18% vs 28%)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Norlane
ahead on 2 of the 4 things we measure here
- is more walkable (76/100 vs 13/100)
- sits closer to the CBD (67.5 km vs 72.4 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Norlane
ahead on 3 of the 5 things we measure here
- is more walkable (76/100 vs 13/100)
- has more GPs (3 vs 0)
- has more residents already 65 and over (18% vs 12%)
- But Lovely Banks carries lower crime risk (67/100 vs 95/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
They split
one each way, out of the 2 things we measure here
- Lovely Banks is growing faster (20.9% vs 4.5%)
- Norlane returns a higher gross yield on houses (4.3% vs 3.3%)
Weighs house yield and population growth.
Where they sit
Lovely Banks and Norlane drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Norlane has more residents (8,682 vs 2,782); Lovely Banks has higher household incomes ($103,532 vs $47,268).
| Lovely Banks | Norlane | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,782 | 8,682 +212% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +20.9% | +4.5% |
| Median age | 37 same for both | |
| Median household income | $103,532/yr +54% vs other | $47,268/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $350/wk +29% vs other | $250/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (17.3%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (17.9%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (3.5%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Lovely Banks | Norlane | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $780,000 | $535,000 |
| Median unit price | $371,500 | $432,500 |
| Median land price | $758,750 | $425,000 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 31 days from 29 sales | 25 days from 83 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
25 vs 148 sales
27 vs 32 sales
Zoning mix
Lovely Banks has more rural and farming land (46% vs 0%); Norlane has more industrially zoned land (14% vs 0%).
| Lovely Banks | Norlane | |
|---|---|---|
| Residential | 51% | 65% |
| Rural and farming | 46% | 0% |
| Industrial | 0% | 14% |
| Parks and recreation | 0% | 9% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 3% | 8% |
| Commercial | 0% | 3% |
| Other and special use | 0% | 1% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Lovely Banks | Norlane | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 3,468 across Greater Geelong same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +56% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Lovely Banks | Norlane | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 3.3% $728/wk on $1.14M | 4.3% $450/wk on $550K |
| Units | — | 4.5% $410/wk on $479K |
Ranking within VIC
| Lovely Banks | Norlane | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 41% of VIC | Higher than 14% of VIC |
| Income | Higher than 76% of VIC | Higher than 8% of VIC |
| Schools | — | Higher than 32% of VIC |
| Walkability | Higher than 76% of VIC | Higher than 92% of VIC |
| Affordability | Higher than 85% of VIC | Higher than 37% of VIC |
| EV adoption | Higher than 71% of VIC | Higher than 18% of VIC |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 77% of VIC | Higher than 89% of VIC |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 28% of VIC | Higher than 83% of VIC |
| Rental yield (units) | — | Higher than 29% of VIC |
Liveability
Norlane is more walkable (76 vs 13).
| Lovely Banks | Norlane | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | C same for both | |
| Score | 36/100 | 35/100 |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 4/10 | high-need area decile 1/10 |
Risk profile
Lovely Banks carries more bushfire risk (78 vs 0); Norlane carries more flood risk (24 vs 0).
| Lovely Banks | Norlane | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | High 78/100 | None 0/100 |
| Crime | Moderate 67/100 | High 95/100 |
| Flood | None 0/100 | Low 24/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 5 within 5 km | 17 within 5 km |
Schools
| Lovely Banks | Norlane | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 1 | 4 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 | 1 |
| Rated below peers | 1 | 0 |
| Universities within 10 km | None | 2 Deakin University, Geelong Waterfront Campus, 6.5 km |
Schools in Lovely Banks
- Geelong Baptist College Independent · Combined below peers
Schools in Norlane
- St Thomas Aquinas School Catholic · Primary at peers
- Northern Bay P-12 College-Peacock Avenue P-8 Campus Government · Combined
- Northern Bay P-12 College-Tallis Street P-8 Campus Government · Combined
- Sirius College - Geelong Campus Independent · Combined
Amenities in the suburb
| Lovely Banks | Norlane | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 0 | 2 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 1 | 4 |
| Parks & reserves | 2 | 10 |
| Childcare | 1 | 6 |
| GPs | 0 | 3 |
| Pharmacies | 0 | 3 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 0 | 2 |
| Fuel stations | 1 | 3 |
| Waterways | 2 | 3 |
Mobility
Lovely Banks sits further from the CBD (72.4 km vs 67.5 km).
| Lovely Banks | Norlane | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 13/100 | 76/100 |
| Distance to Melbourne | 72.4 km +7% vs other | 67.5 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 58 min | 56 min |
| Public transport score | 52/100 | 76/100 |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 12.5 7-9am + 5-7pm | 167.5 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 1 min scheduled, not actual | 0 min scheduled, not actual |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.8% postcode 3213 | 0.3% postcode 3214 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 47 postcode 3213 | 30 postcode 3214 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (77.2%).
Setting
| Lovely Banks | Norlane | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 91 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 20 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 7.1 km | 1.7 km 4.9 km to a named beach |
NBN connectivity
| Lovely Banks | Norlane | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 65/100 | 78/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the premises same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 45% 1,128 premises | 59% 5,146 premises |
Climate
| Lovely Banks | Norlane | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 454 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 26.1°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 5.5°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Lovely Banks | Norlane | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 5.0 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 20.5 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | — same for both | |
Council rates
| Lovely Banks | Norlane | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,802/yr same for both | |
| Council | Greater Geelong same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Lovely Banks | Norlane | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Corio same for both | |
| Member | Richard Marles same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Lovely Banks | Norlane | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Lovely Banks
Norlane
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Lovely Banks
Other comparisons with Norlane
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.