Lotus Creek vs St Lawrence
Lotus Creek is the younger of the two, with a median age of 33 against 52 in St Lawrence. In both, most households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Lotus Creek, most households are couple families. In St Lawrence, about half of households are people living alone. On these figures, Lotus Creek tends to suit families with children and couples, while St Lawrence suits people living alone and older residents.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Lotus Creek
ahead on 2 of the 6 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (39/100 vs 65/100)
- is already more of a family suburb (65% vs 41%)
- But St Lawrence has more separate houses rather than flats (97% vs 84%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
Renters
Lotus Creek
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($0/wk vs $100/wk)
Weighs rent and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
St Lawrence
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- sits closer to the CBD (814.2 km vs 863.6 km)
- has a shorter drive in (566 min vs 600 min)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Lotus Creek
ahead on 2 of the 5 things we measure here
- has more units and townhouses to downsize into (16% vs 3%)
- carries lower crime risk (39/100 vs 65/100)
- But St Lawrence has more residents already 65 and over (24% vs 4%)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Lotus Creek
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (50.7% vs 4.3%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Lotus Creek and St Lawrence drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
St Lawrence rents higher ($100/wk vs $0/wk); St Lawrence has more residents (245 vs 113).
| Lotus Creek | St Lawrence | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 113 | 245 +117% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +50.7% | +4.3% |
| Median age | 33 | 52 |
| Median household income | $93,600/yr +43% vs other | $53,612/yr |
| Median weekly rent | — | $100/wk (not reported on the other side) |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (24.9%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (18.6%).
Property market
| Lotus Creek | St Lawrence | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | — | $225,000 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — | $85,000 |
Development activity
| Lotus Creek | St Lawrence | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 27 across Isaac same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +0% same for both | |
Ranking within QLD
| Lotus Creek | St Lawrence | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 67% of QLD | Higher than 16% of QLD |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 54% of QLD | Higher than 41% of QLD |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | — same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 19% of QLD | Higher than 39% of QLD |
Liveability
| Lotus Creek | St Lawrence | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | advantaged area decile 7/10 | high-need area decile 1/10 |
Risk profile
St Lawrence carries more crime risk (65 vs 39).
| Lotus Creek | St Lawrence | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Moderate 41/100 | Low 39/100 |
| Crime | Low 39/100 | Moderate 65/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 | High 98/100 |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Lotus Creek | St Lawrence | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 | 1 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Schools in Lotus Creek
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Schools in St Lawrence
- St Lawrence State School Government · Primary
Amenities in the suburb
| Lotus Creek | St Lawrence | |
|---|---|---|
| Cafes & restaurants | 2 | 0 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 3 |
| Police stations | 0 | 1 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 0 | 1 |
| Fuel stations | 1 | 0 |
| Waterways | 138 | 74 |
Mobility
Lotus Creek sits further from the CBD (863.6 km vs 814.2 km).
| Lotus Creek | St Lawrence | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 same for both | |
| Distance to Brisbane | 863.6 km +6% vs other | 814.2 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 600 min | 566 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.0% postcode 4705 | 0.0% postcode 4707 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 41 postcode 4705 | 29 postcode 4707 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (52.8%).
Setting
| Lotus Creek | St Lawrence | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 155 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 5 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 48.0 km | 11.2 km |
NBN connectivity
| Lotus Creek | St Lawrence | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 15/100 | 28/100 |
| Most common technology | Satellite (Sky Muster) | Fixed wireless |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 35 premises | 0% 169 premises |
Climate
| Lotus Creek | St Lawrence | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 917 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 31.5°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 12.1°C same for both | |
Council rates
| Lotus Creek | St Lawrence | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $925/yr same for both | |
| Council | Isaac same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Lotus Creek | St Lawrence | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Capricornia same for both | |
| Member | Michelle Landry same for both | |
| Party | Liberal National Party of Queensland same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Lotus Creek | St Lawrence | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $30,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Lotus Creek
St Lawrence
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Lotus Creek
Other comparisons with St Lawrence
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.