Loganholme vs Edens Landing
Comparing Loganholme and Edens Landing, QLD: Edens Landing is more walkable (74 vs 52); Loganholme carries more crime risk (81 vs 58); and Loganholme has more residents (6,764 vs 5,094).
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
They split
one each way, out of the 6 things we measure here
- Loganholme has more childcare (8 vs 4)
- Edens Landing carries lower crime risk (58/100 vs 81/100)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 3 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs house prices, unit prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Edens Landing
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($350/wk vs $395/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Loganholme
ahead on 2 of the 4 things we measure here
- has a shorter drive in (30 min vs 35 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (31.4 km vs 34 km)
- But Edens Landing is more walkable (74/100 vs 52/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Edens Landing
ahead on 3 of the 5 things we measure here
- has more units and townhouses to downsize into (18% vs 7%)
- is more walkable (74/100 vs 52/100)
- carries lower crime risk (58/100 vs 81/100)
- But Loganholme has more GPs (3 vs 1)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Loganholme
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (7.3% vs 0.0%)
Weighs house yield and population growth.
Where they sit
Loganholme and Edens Landing drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Loganholme has more residents (6,764 vs 5,094); Loganholme rents higher ($395/wk vs $350/wk).
| Loganholme | Edens Landing | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 6,764 +25% vs other | 5,094 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +7.3% | +0.0% |
| Median age | 34 | 35 |
| Median household income | $95,680/yr +10% vs other | $85,696/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $395/wk +11% vs other | $350/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (15.9%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (20.2%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (8.1%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Loganholme | Edens Landing | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $876,750 | $870,500 |
| Median unit price | $610,000 | $634,400 |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 24 days from 64 sales | 19 days from 45 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
73 vs 53 sales
65 vs 59 sales
11 vs 6 sales
Development activity
| Loganholme | Edens Landing | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 4,950 across Logan same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -8% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Loganholme | Edens Landing | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 4.0% $692/wk on $892K | 4.3% $700/wk on $850K |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within QLD
| Loganholme | Edens Landing | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 69% of QLD | Higher than 59% of QLD |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 87% of QLD | Higher than 94% of QLD |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 72% of QLD | Higher than 77% of QLD |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 89% of QLD | Higher than 88% of QLD |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 57% of QLD | Higher than 68% of QLD |
Liveability
Edens Landing is more walkable (74 vs 52); Edens Landing scores higher overall (59 vs 50).
| Loganholme | Edens Landing | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | B same for both | |
| Score | 50/100 | 59/100 |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 4/10 | below-average income decile 3/10 |
Risk profile
Loganholme carries more crime risk (81 vs 58).
| Loganholme | Edens Landing | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Crime | High 81/100 | Moderate 58/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 2 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Loganholme | Edens Landing | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 1 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 1 | 0 |
| Rated below peers | 0 | 1 |
Schools in Loganholme
- Loganholme State School Government · Primary at peers
Schools in Edens Landing
- Edens Landing State School Government · Primary below peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Loganholme | Edens Landing | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 4 | 1 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 9 | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | 17 | 20 |
| Childcare | 8 | 4 |
| GPs | 3 | 1 |
| Pharmacies | 6 | 0 |
| Police stations | 1 | 0 |
| Fuel stations | 3 | 0 |
| EV chargers | 1 | 0 |
Mobility
Edens Landing sits further from the CBD (34 km vs 31.4 km).
| Loganholme | Edens Landing | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 52/100 | 74/100 |
| Distance to Brisbane | 31.4 km | 34 km +8% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 30 min | 35 min |
| Public transport score | 78/100 Bus | 76/100 Rail · Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 61.2 7-9am + 5-7pm | 25.5 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 1 min scheduled, not actual same for both | |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.7% postcode 4129 | 0.8% postcode 4207 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 79 postcode 4129 | 70 postcode 4207 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (78.1%).
Setting
| Loganholme | Edens Landing | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 4 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 25 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 11.1 km | 12.6 km |
NBN connectivity
| Loganholme | Edens Landing | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 77/100 | 76/100 |
| Most common technology | Hybrid fibre-coaxial same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 22% 3,574 premises | 16% 1,955 premises |
Climate
| Loganholme | Edens Landing | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 1,032 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 30.5°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 8.9°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Loganholme | Edens Landing | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 5.3 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 14.6 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.48 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Loganholme | Edens Landing | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,681/yr same for both | |
| Council | Logan same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Loganholme | Edens Landing | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Forde same for both | |
| Member | Rowan Holzberger same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Loganholme | Edens Landing | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $30,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Loganholme
Other comparisons with Edens Landing
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.