Loganholme vs Bethania
Loganholme is the younger of the two, with a median age of 34 against 48 in Bethania. In both, most households own their home and most homes are detached houses. In Loganholme, about half of households are couple families. In Bethania, about half of households are people living alone. On these figures, Loganholme tends to suit families with children and couples, while Bethania suits people living alone and older residents.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Loganholme
ahead on 4 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more childcare (8 vs 3)
- has more parks and reserves (17 vs 10)
- is already more of a family suburb (72% vs 46%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Loganholme
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- leaves households under less mortgage stress (21% vs 32%)
Weighs house prices, unit prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
They split
one each way, out of the 3 things we measure here
- Loganholme leaves renters under less rental stress (22% vs 32%)
- Bethania has cheaper rent ($340/wk vs $395/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
They split
one each way, out of the 4 things we measure here
- Loganholme has a shorter drive in (30 min vs 36 min)
- Bethania is more walkable (74/100 vs 52/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Bethania
ahead on 3 of the 5 things we measure here
- has more units and townhouses to downsize into (26% vs 7%)
- has more residents already 65 and over (33% vs 11%)
- is more walkable (74/100 vs 52/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Bethania
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (17.6% vs 7.3%)
Weighs house yield and population growth.
Where they sit
Loganholme and Bethania drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Loganholme has higher household incomes ($95,680 vs $55,848); Bethania skews older (48 vs 34).
| Loganholme | Bethania | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 6,764 +6% vs other | 6,333 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +7.3% | +17.6% |
| Median age | 34 | 48 |
| Median household income | $95,680/yr +42% vs other | $55,848/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $395/wk +14% vs other | $340/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (15.9%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (20.2%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (8.1%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Loganholme | Bethania | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $876,750 | $860,000 |
| Median unit price | $610,000 | $595,625 |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 24 days from 64 sales | 26 days from 82 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
73 vs 86 sales
65 vs 38 sales
11 vs 10 sales
Development activity
| Loganholme | Bethania | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 4,950 across Logan same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -8% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Loganholme | Bethania | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 4.0% $692/wk on $892K | 3.8% $635/wk on $875K |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within QLD
| Loganholme | Bethania | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 69% of QLD | Higher than 18% of QLD |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 87% of QLD | Higher than 94% of QLD |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 72% of QLD | Higher than 66% of QLD |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 89% of QLD | Higher than 79% of QLD |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 57% of QLD | Higher than 39% of QLD |
Liveability
Bethania is more walkable (74 vs 52).
| Loganholme | Bethania | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | B | C |
| Score | 50/100 | 47/100 |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 4/10 | high-need area decile 1/10 |
Risk profile
| Loganholme | Bethania | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Crime | High 81/100 | High 74/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 2 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Loganholme | Bethania | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 1 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 1 | 0 |
| Rated below peers | 0 | 1 |
Schools in Loganholme
- Loganholme State School Government · Primary at peers
Schools in Bethania
- Bethania Lutheran Primary School Independent · Primary below peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Loganholme | Bethania | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 4 | 2 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 9 | 3 |
| Parks & reserves | 17 | 10 |
| Childcare | 8 | 3 |
| GPs | 3 same for both | |
| Pharmacies | 6 | 1 |
| Police stations | 1 | 0 |
| Fuel stations | 3 | 1 |
| EV chargers | 1 | 0 |
| Waterways | 0 | 3 |
Mobility
| Loganholme | Bethania | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 52/100 | 74/100 |
| Distance to Brisbane | 31.4 km | 33.3 km +6% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 30 min | 36 min |
| Public transport score | 78/100 Bus | 80/100 Rail · Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 61.2 7-9am + 5-7pm | 31.0 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 1 min scheduled, not actual same for both | |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.7% postcode 4129 | 0.6% postcode 4205 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 79 postcode 4129 | 65 postcode 4205 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (78.0%).
Setting
| Loganholme | Bethania | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 4 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 12 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 11.1 km | 14.0 km |
NBN connectivity
| Loganholme | Bethania | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 77/100 | 70/100 |
| Most common technology | Hybrid fibre-coaxial same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 22% 3,574 premises | 18% 3,331 premises |
Climate
| Loganholme | Bethania | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 1,032 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 30.5°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 8.9°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Loganholme | Bethania | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 5.3 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 14.6 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.48 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Loganholme | Bethania | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,681/yr same for both | |
| Council | Logan same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Loganholme | Bethania | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Forde same for both | |
| Member | Rowan Holzberger same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Loganholme | Bethania | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $30,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Loganholme
Bethania
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Loganholme
Other comparisons with Bethania
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.