Loftus vs Sutherland
In both, most households own their home. In Loftus, the large majority of homes are detached houses and most households are couple families. In Sutherland, most homes are flats or apartments and about half of households are people living alone. On these figures, Loftus tends to suit families with children and couples, while Sutherland suits young adults and people living alone.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
They split
one each way, out of the 6 things we measure here
- Loftus has more separate houses rather than flats (88% vs 19%)
- Sutherland has more schools rated above their peers (2 vs 0)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Sutherland
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper units ($825,000 vs $1,377,500)
Weighs house prices, unit prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Sutherland
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a bigger rental market to choose from (44% vs 11%)
- has cheaper rent ($450/wk vs $550/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Sutherland
ahead on 3 of the 4 things we measure here
- is more walkable (92/100 vs 73/100)
- has a shorter drive in (40 min vs 45 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (31 km vs 34 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Sutherland
ahead on 3 of the 5 things we measure here
- has more units and townhouses to downsize into (81% vs 12%)
- has more GPs (3 vs 1)
- is more walkable (92/100 vs 73/100)
- But Loftus carries lower crime risk (23/100 vs 75/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
They split
one each way, out of the 2 things we measure here
- Loftus returns a higher gross yield on houses (3.7% vs 3.2%)
- Sutherland is growing faster (7.0% vs 1.3%)
Weighs house yield and population growth.
Where they sit
Loftus and Sutherland drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Sutherland has more residents (11,570 vs 4,190); Loftus has higher household incomes ($126,100 vs $101,348).
| Loftus | Sutherland | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,190 | 11,570 +176% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +1.3% | +7.0% |
| Median age | 39 | 37 |
| Median household income | $126,100/yr +20% vs other | $101,348/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $550/wk +18% vs other | $450/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (20.2%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (18.5%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (3.4%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Loftus | Sutherland | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,640,000 | $1,633,500 |
| Median unit price | $1,377,500 | $825,000 |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 21 days from 27 sales | 22 days from 29 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
13 vs 19 sales
15 vs 16 sales
Zoning mix
Loftus has more land zoned for conservation (71% vs 15%).
| Loftus | Sutherland | |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental | 71% | 15% |
| Residential | 15% | 42% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 12% | 24% |
| Parks and recreation | 2% | 10% |
| Commercial | 0% | 9% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Loftus | Sutherland | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 1,449 across Sutherland same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +117% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Loftus | Sutherland | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 3.7% $1,000/wk on $1.4M | 3.2% $850/wk on $1.38M |
| Units | — | 4.3% $700/wk on $855K |
Ranking within NSW
| Loftus | Sutherland | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 76% of NSW | Higher than 78% of NSW |
| Income | Higher than 87% of NSW | — |
| Schools | Higher than 29% of NSW | Higher than 80% of NSW |
| Walkability | Higher than 90% of NSW | Higher than 97% of NSW |
| Affordability | Higher than 48% of NSW | — |
| EV adoption | Higher than 90% of NSW same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 95% of NSW | Higher than 78% of NSW |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 58% of NSW | Higher than 30% of NSW |
| Rental yield (units) | — | Higher than 34% of NSW |
Liveability
Sutherland is more walkable (92 vs 73); Sutherland scores higher overall (61 vs 50).
| Loftus | Sutherland | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | B same for both | |
| Score | 50/100 | 61/100 |
| Socio-economic band | very advantaged area decile 10/10 | very advantaged area decile 9/10 |
Risk profile
Sutherland carries more crime risk (75 vs 23); Loftus carries more bushfire risk (88 vs 58).
| Loftus | Sutherland | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | High 88/100 | Moderate 58/100 |
| Crime | Low 23/100 | High 75/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 1 within 5 km | 0 within 5 km |
Schools
| Loftus | Sutherland | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 3 | 5 |
| Rated above peers | 0 | 2 |
| Rated at peers | 1 | 2 |
| Rated below peers | 0 | 1 |
Schools in Loftus
- Loftus Public School Government · Primary at peers
- Aspect South East Sydney School, Loftus Independent · Primary · Special school
- Cook School Government · Combined · Special school
Schools in Sutherland
- Sutherland North Public School Government · Primary above peers
- Sutherland Public School Government · Primary above peers
- St Patrick's Catholic Primary School Catholic · Primary at peers
- St Patrick's College Sutherland Catholic · Secondary at peers
- Minerva School Government · Combined · Special school below peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Loftus | Sutherland | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 0 | 2 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 2 | 15 |
| Parks & reserves | 5 | 15 |
| Childcare | 5 | 10 |
| GPs | 1 | 3 |
| Pharmacies | 1 | 3 |
| Police stations | 0 | 1 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 0 | 4 |
| Fuel stations | 1 same for both | |
| Waterways | 2 | 3 |
Mobility
Loftus sits further from the CBD (34 km vs 31 km).
| Loftus | Sutherland | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 73/100 | 92/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 34 km +9% vs other | 31 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 45 min | 40 min |
| Public transport score | 79/100 Rail · Bus same for both | |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 61.5 7-9am + 5-7pm | 161.0 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 0 min scheduled, not actual same for both | |
| Electric vehicle share | 1.5% postcode 2232 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 22 postcode 2232 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (46.6%).
Setting
| Loftus | Sutherland | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 96 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 111 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 8.1 km | 6.6 km |
NBN connectivity
| Loftus | Sutherland | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 90/100 | 71/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the premises | Fibre to the node |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 52% 1,597 premises | 23% 6,498 premises |
Climate
| Loftus | Sutherland | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 1,038 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | — same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | — same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Loftus | Sutherland | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 6.5 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 16.1 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.79 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Loftus | Sutherland | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,552/yr same for both | |
| Council | Sutherland same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Loftus | Sutherland | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Hughes same for both | |
| Member | David Moncrieff same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Loftus | Sutherland | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Loftus
Sutherland
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Loftus
Other comparisons with Sutherland
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.