Lockyer Waters vs Spring Creek
Spring Creek is the younger of the two, with a median age of 36 against 46 in Lockyer Waters. In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Spring Creek, about half of households are couple families. Houses cost more in Spring Creek: a median of $940,000, against $825,000 in Lockyer Waters, though rent is higher in Lockyer Waters. On these figures, Lockyer Waters tends to suit families with children, while Spring Creek suits young adults and people living alone.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
They split
one each way, out of the 6 things we measure here
- Lockyer Waters is already more of a family suburb (63% vs 54%)
- Spring Creek carries lower crime risk (20/100 vs 32/100)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Lockyer Waters
ahead on 2 of the 2 things we measure here
- leaves households under less mortgage stress (20% vs 30%)
- has cheaper houses ($825,000 vs $940,000)
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
Spring Creek
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($250/wk vs $310/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Lockyer Waters
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a shorter drive in (77 min vs 84 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (92.8 km vs 101 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
They split
one each way, out of the 4 things we measure here
- Lockyer Waters has more residents already 65 and over (18% vs 8%)
- Spring Creek carries lower crime risk (20/100 vs 32/100)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Lockyer Waters
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (-4.1% vs -17.8%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Lockyer Waters and Spring Creek drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Lockyer Waters skews older (46 vs 36); Lockyer Waters rents higher ($310/wk vs $250/wk).
| Lockyer Waters | Spring Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 538 +8% vs other | 494 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | -4.1% | -17.8% |
| Median age | 46 | 36 |
| Median household income | $75,920/yr +9% vs other | $68,900/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $310/wk +19% vs other | $250/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (26.5%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (22.5%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (4.3%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Lockyer Waters | Spring Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $825,000 | $940,000 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | $885,000 | — |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 65 days from 3 sales | — |
Development activity
| Lockyer Waters | Spring Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 352 across Lockyer Valley same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +103% same for both | |
Ranking within QLD
| Lockyer Waters | Spring Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | — | Higher than 36% of QLD |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 40% of QLD | Higher than 11% of QLD |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 52% of QLD | Higher than 33% of QLD |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 59% of QLD | Higher than 38% of QLD |
Liveability
| Lockyer Waters | Spring Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | C | — |
| Score | 44/100 | — |
| Socio-economic band | high-need area decile 1/10 | below-average income decile 2/10 |
Risk profile
Lockyer Waters carries more crime risk (32 vs 20).
| Lockyer Waters | Spring Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Crime | Low 32/100 | Low 20/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 1 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Lockyer Waters | Spring Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Lockyer Waters | Spring Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Waterways | 1 | 4 |
Mobility
Spring Creek sits further from the CBD (101 km vs 92.8 km).
| Lockyer Waters | Spring Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 same for both | |
| Distance to Brisbane | 92.8 km | 101 km +9% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 77 min | 84 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.3% postcode 4311 | 0.2% postcode 4343 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 92 postcode 4311 | 83 postcode 4343 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (86.9%).
Setting
| Lockyer Waters | Spring Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 80 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 123 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Lockyer Waters | Spring Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 30/100 | 28/100 |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 222 premises | 0% 125 premises |
Climate
| Lockyer Waters | Spring Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 697 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 31.9°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 7.1°C same for both | |
Council rates
| Lockyer Waters | Spring Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,952/yr same for both | |
| Council | Lockyer Valley same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Lockyer Waters | Spring Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Wright same for both | |
| Member | Scott Buchholz same for both | |
| Party | Liberal National Party of Queensland same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Lockyer Waters | Spring Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $30,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Lockyer Waters
Spring Creek
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Lockyer Waters
Other comparisons with Spring Creek
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.