Lockington vs Bamawm Extension
Bamawm Extension is the younger of the two, with a median age of 41 against 47 in Lockington. In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Bamawm Extension, most households are couple families. On these figures, Lockington tends to suit people living alone, while Bamawm Extension suits couples.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Bamawm Extension
ahead on 2 of the 6 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (16/100 vs 27/100)
- is already more of a family suburb (75% vs 56%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Bamawm Extension
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- leaves renters under less rental stress (10% vs 16%)
- has cheaper rent ($160/wk vs $200/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Lockington
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- sits closer to the CBD (215.6 km vs 228 km)
- has a shorter drive in (161 min vs 167 min)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
They split
one each way, out of the 4 things we measure here
- Lockington has more residents already 65 and over (24% vs 18%)
- Bamawm Extension carries lower crime risk (16/100 vs 27/100)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Bamawm Extension
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (18.5% vs 5.2%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Lockington and Bamawm Extension drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Lockington has more residents (850 vs 282); Lockington rents higher ($200/wk vs $160/wk).
| Lockington | Bamawm Extension | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 850 +67% vs other | 282 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +5.2% | +18.5% |
| Median age | 47 | 41 |
| Median household income | $65,936/yr | $79,300/yr +20% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $200/wk +20% vs other | $160/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (16.2%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (2.2%).
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (23.4%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Lockington | Bamawm Extension | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $380,000 | — |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 57 days from 4 sales | — |
Zoning mix
| Lockington | Bamawm Extension | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 98% | 100% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 1% | 0% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Lockington | Bamawm Extension | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 264 across Campaspe same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +63% same for both | |
Ranking within VIC
| Lockington | Bamawm Extension | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 5% of VIC | — |
| Income | Higher than 26% of VIC | Higher than 46% of VIC |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 41% of VIC | Higher than 40% of VIC |
| Affordability | Higher than 96% of VIC | — |
| EV adoption | — | Higher than 12% of VIC |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 62% of VIC same for both | |
Liveability
| Lockington | Bamawm Extension | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | C | — |
| Score | 37/100 | — |
| Socio-economic band | below-average income decile 2/10 | mid-range socio-economic decile 6/10 |
Risk profile
Bamawm Extension carries more flood risk (73 vs 34); Lockington carries more crime risk (27 vs 16).
| Lockington | Bamawm Extension | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Low 14/100 | Low 16/100 |
| Crime | Low 27/100 | Low 16/100 |
| Flood | Low 34/100 | High 73/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 1 within 5 km | 0 within 5 km |
Schools
| Lockington | Bamawm Extension | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 1 | 0 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 1 | 0 |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Schools in Lockington
- Lockington Consolidated School Government · Primary at peers
Schools in Bamawm Extension
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Amenities in the suburb
| Lockington | Bamawm Extension | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 1 | 0 |
| Parks & reserves | 4 | 2 |
| Childcare | 2 | 0 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 2 | 0 |
| Fuel stations | 1 | 0 |
| Waterways | 1 | 0 |
Mobility
Bamawm Extension sits further from the CBD (228 km vs 215.6 km).
| Lockington | Bamawm Extension | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 same for both | |
| Distance to Melbourne | 215.6 km | 228 km +6% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 161 min | 167 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.0% postcode 3563 | 0.2% postcode 3564 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 61 postcode 3563 | 54 postcode 3564 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (69.8%).
Setting
| Lockington | Bamawm Extension | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 106 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 102 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Lockington | Bamawm Extension | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 30/100 same for both | |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 389 premises | 0% 90 premises |
Climate
| Lockington | Bamawm Extension | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 438 mm | 406 mm |
| Summer max (Jan) | — | 31.6°C |
| Winter min (Jul) | — | 3.9°C |
Council rates
| Lockington | Bamawm Extension | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $2,035/yr same for both | |
| Council | Campaspe same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Lockington | Bamawm Extension | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Nicholls same for both | |
| Member | Sam Birrell same for both | |
| Party | The Nationals same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Lockington | Bamawm Extension | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Lockington
Bamawm Extension
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Lockington
Other comparisons with Bamawm Extension
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.