Lobethal vs Mount Torrens
In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Mount Torrens, most households are couple families. Houses cost more in Mount Torrens: a median of $922,000, against $755,000 in Lobethal. Lobethal is closer to the city centre: 42.8 km, against 49.3 km. On these figures, Lobethal tends to suit people living alone and buyers on a tighter budget, while Mount Torrens suits couples.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Mount Torrens
ahead on 2 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more schools rated above their peers (1 vs 0)
- is already more of a family suburb (70% vs 59%)
- But Lobethal has more parks and reserves (5 vs 1)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Lobethal
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper houses ($755,000 vs $922,500)
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
Too close to call
Nothing among the 3 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Lobethal
ahead on 3 of the 3 things we measure here
- is more walkable (51/100 vs 14/100)
- sits closer to the CBD (42.8 km vs 49.3 km)
- has a shorter drive in (47 min vs 52 min)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Lobethal
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is more walkable (51/100 vs 14/100)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Mount Torrens
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (8.0% vs 0.3%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Lobethal and Mount Torrens drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Lobethal has more residents (2,534 vs 768); Mount Torrens has higher household incomes ($98,592 vs $79,508).
| Lobethal | Mount Torrens | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,534 +70% vs other | 768 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +0.3% | +8.0% |
| Median age | 43 | 45 |
| Median household income | $79,508/yr | $98,592/yr +24% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $310/wk | $325/wk +5% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (19.9%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (20.1%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (5.7%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Lobethal | Mount Torrens | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $755,000 | $922,500 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | $440,000 | — |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 28 days from 24 sales | 27 days from 3 sales |
Zoning mix
| Lobethal | Mount Torrens | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 93% | 100% |
| Residential | 5% | 0% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Lobethal | Mount Torrens | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 95 across Adelaide Hills same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +53% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Lobethal | Mount Torrens | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 4.5% $630/wk on $722K | — |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within SA
| Lobethal | Mount Torrens | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 11% of SA | Higher than 1% of SA |
| Income | Higher than 54% of SA | Higher than 78% of SA |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 81% of SA | Higher than 67% of SA |
| Affordability | Higher than 88% of SA | Higher than 100% of SA |
| EV adoption | Higher than 47% of SA | Higher than 80% of SA |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 76% of SA | Higher than 50% of SA |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 89% of SA | — |
Liveability
Lobethal is more walkable (51 vs 14).
| Lobethal | Mount Torrens | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | C same for both | |
| Score | 46/100 | 44/100 |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 5/10 | advantaged area decile 7/10 |
Risk profile
| Lobethal | Mount Torrens | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | High 83/100 | High 77/100 |
| Crime | Low 23/100 | Low 14/100 |
| Flood | Low 18/100 | — |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 3 within 5 km | 0 within 5 km |
Schools
| Lobethal | Mount Torrens | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 2 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 | 1 |
| Rated at peers | 1 | 0 |
| Rated below peers | 1 same for both | |
Schools in Lobethal
- Lobethal Lutheran School Independent · Primary at peers
- Lobethal Primary School Government · Primary below peers
Schools in Mount Torrens
- St Benedict School Independent · Primary above peers
- Mount Torrens Christian School Independent · Combined below peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Lobethal | Mount Torrens | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 1 | 0 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 1 | 0 |
| Parks & reserves | 5 | 1 |
| Childcare | 2 | 0 |
| GPs | 1 | 0 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 1 same for both | |
| Fuel stations | 1 | 0 |
| Waterways | 0 | 2 |
Mobility
Mount Torrens sits further from the CBD (49.3 km vs 42.8 km).
| Lobethal | Mount Torrens | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 51/100 | 14/100 |
| Distance to Adelaide | 42.8 km | 49.3 km +15% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 47 min | 52 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.4% postcode 5241 | 1.1% postcode 5244 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 75 postcode 5241 | 82 postcode 5244 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (78.4%).
Setting
| Lobethal | Mount Torrens | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 417 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 510 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 31.0 km | 38.6 km |
NBN connectivity
| Lobethal | Mount Torrens | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 57/100 | 30/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the node | Fixed wireless |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 25% 1,254 premises | 0% 318 premises |
Climate
| Lobethal | Mount Torrens | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 921 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | — same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | — same for both | |
Council rates
| Lobethal | Mount Torrens | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $2,727/yr same for both | |
| Council | Adelaide Hills same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Lobethal | Mount Torrens | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Mayo same for both | |
| Member | Rebekha Sharkie same for both | |
| Party | Centre Alliance same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Lobethal | Mount Torrens | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $15,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | — same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Lobethal
Other comparisons with Mount Torrens
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.