Limestone Creek vs Mount Chalmers
In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Limestone Creek, most households are couple families. On these figures, Limestone Creek tends to suit couples, while Mount Chalmers suits people living alone.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
They split
one each way, out of the 6 things we measure here
- Limestone Creek is already more of a family suburb (72% vs 56%)
- Mount Chalmers carries lower crime risk (29/100 vs 44/100)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Limestone Creek
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- leaves renters under less rental stress (14% vs 28%)
- has cheaper rent ($325/wk vs $355/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Limestone Creek
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a shorter drive in (448 min vs 475 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (644.8 km vs 660.8 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Mount Chalmers
ahead on 2 of the 4 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (29/100 vs 44/100)
- has more residents already 65 and over (25% vs 18%)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Limestone Creek and Mount Chalmers drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Limestone Creek has higher household incomes ($118,612 vs $65,936); Mount Chalmers has more residents (226 vs 179).
| Limestone Creek | Mount Chalmers | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 179 | 226 +26% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | -3.8% same for both | |
| Median age | 46 | 47 |
| Median household income | $118,612/yr +44% vs other | $65,936/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $325/wk | $355/wk +9% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (19.9%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (3.1%).
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (18.1%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Limestone Creek | Mount Chalmers | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | — | $622,055 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | — | 48 days from 6 sales |
Development activity
| Limestone Creek | Mount Chalmers | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 390 across Rockhampton | 317 across Livingstone |
| Approvals change year on year | +133% | +97% |
Ranking within QLD
| Limestone Creek | Mount Chalmers | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | — | Higher than 31% of QLD |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 69% of QLD | Higher than 73% of QLD |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 55% of QLD | Higher than 18% of QLD |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 30% of QLD | Higher than 37% of QLD |
Liveability
| Limestone Creek | Mount Chalmers | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | very advantaged area decile 10/10 | high-need area decile 1/10 |
Risk profile
Limestone Creek carries more crime risk (44 vs 29).
| Limestone Creek | Mount Chalmers | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | High 77/100 | High 74/100 |
| Crime | Moderate 44/100 | Low 29/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Limestone Creek | Mount Chalmers | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 | 1 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
| Universities within 10 km | 1 Rockhampton C.Q.U. Campus, 5.1 km | None |
Schools in Limestone Creek
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Schools in Mount Chalmers
- Carinity Education - Rockhampton - Mount Chalmers Campus Independent · Secondary
Amenities in the suburb
| Limestone Creek | Mount Chalmers | |
|---|---|---|
| Waterways | 1 | 0 |
Mobility
Mount Chalmers sits further from the CBD (660.8 km vs 644.8 km).
| Limestone Creek | Mount Chalmers | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 6/100 | 13/100 |
| Distance to Brisbane | 644.8 km | 660.8 km +2% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 448 min | 475 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.4% postcode 4701 | 0.2% postcode 4702 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 54 postcode 4701 | 58 postcode 4702 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (82.9%).
Setting
| Limestone Creek | Mount Chalmers | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 86 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 79 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 19.5 km | 13.6 km |
NBN connectivity
| Limestone Creek | Mount Chalmers | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 22/100 | 28/100 |
| Most common technology | Satellite (Sky Muster) | Fixed wireless |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 45 premises | 0% 100 premises |
Climate
| Limestone Creek | Mount Chalmers | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 811 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 32.5°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 11.6°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Limestone Creek | Mount Chalmers | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 4.3 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 8.6 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | — same for both | |
Council rates
| Limestone Creek | Mount Chalmers | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,313/yr | $2,445/yr |
| Council | Rockhampton | Livingstone |
Federal electorate
| Limestone Creek | Mount Chalmers | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Capricornia same for both | |
| Member | Michelle Landry same for both | |
| Party | Liberal National Party of Queensland same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Limestone Creek | Mount Chalmers | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $30,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Limestone Creek
Mount Chalmers
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Limestone Creek
Other comparisons with Mount Chalmers
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.