Lima South vs Bridge Creek
Comparing Lima South and Bridge Creek, VIC: Bridge Creek carries more bushfire risk (96 vs 0); Lima South rents higher ($300/wk vs $200/wk); and Lima South sits further from the CBD (235.9 km vs 207.7 km).
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Bridge Creek
ahead on 3 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more parks and reserves (6 vs 0)
- carries lower crime risk (12/100 vs 83/100)
- has more separate houses rather than flats (100% vs 90%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Bridge Creek
ahead on 2 of the 2 things we measure here
- leaves renters under less rental stress (12% vs 19%)
- has cheaper rent ($200/wk vs $300/wk)
Weighs rent and rental stress.
Commuting to the city
They split
one each way, out of the 3 things we measure here
- Lima South has a shorter drive in (157 min vs 187 min)
- Bridge Creek sits closer to the CBD (207.7 km vs 235.9 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Bridge Creek
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- carries lower crime risk (12/100 vs 83/100)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Lima South
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (43.4% vs 20.6%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Lima South and Bridge Creek drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Lima South rents higher ($300/wk vs $200/wk); Bridge Creek skews older (49 vs 47).
| Lima South | Bridge Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 142 +18% vs other | 117 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +43.4% | +20.6% |
| Median age | 47 | 49 |
| Median household income | $83,408/yr | $84,500/yr +1% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $300/wk +33% vs other | $200/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (21.1%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (18.3%).
Zoning mix
| Lima South | Bridge Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks and recreation | 48% | 56% |
| Rural and farming | 50% | 44% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 2% | 0% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Lima South | Bridge Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 235 across Benalla | 76 across Mansfield |
| Approvals change year on year | +65% | -50% |
Ranking within VIC
| Lima South | Bridge Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 51% of VIC | Higher than 53% of VIC |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 24% of VIC | Higher than 1% of VIC |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 50% of VIC | Higher than 59% of VIC |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 17% of VIC | Higher than 33% of VIC |
Liveability
| Lima South | Bridge Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 5/10 | very advantaged area decile 10/10 |
Risk profile
Bridge Creek carries more bushfire risk (96 vs 0); Lima South carries more crime risk (83 vs 12).
| Lima South | Bridge Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 | High 96/100 |
| Crime | High 83/100 | Low 12/100 |
| Flood | Low 21/100 | Low 18/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Lima South | Bridge Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Lima South | Bridge Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 0 | 6 |
| Waterways | 7 | 9 |
Mobility
Lima South sits further from the CBD (235.9 km vs 207.7 km).
| Lima South | Bridge Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 same for both | |
| Distance to Melbourne | 235.9 km +12% vs other | 207.7 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 157 min | 187 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.5% postcode 3673 | 0.6% postcode 3723 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 66 postcode 3673 | 33 postcode 3723 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (67.2%).
Setting
| Lima South | Bridge Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 239 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 609 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Lima South | Bridge Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 20/100 | 28/100 |
| Most common technology | Satellite (Sky Muster) | Fixed wireless |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 33 premises | 0% 52 premises |
Climate
| Lima South | Bridge Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 865 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 27.2°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 2.0°C same for both | |
Council rates
| Lima South | Bridge Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $2,119/yr | $1,697/yr |
| Council | Benalla | Mansfield |
Federal electorate
| Lima South | Bridge Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Indi same for both | |
| Member | Helen Haines same for both | |
| Party | Independent same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Lima South | Bridge Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Lima South
Other comparisons with Bridge Creek
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.