Leederville vs Mount Hawthorn
In both, most households own their home. In Leederville, about half of households are people living alone. In Mount Hawthorn, the large majority of homes are detached houses and about half of households are couple families. Leederville is closer to the city centre: 4.6 km, against 6.5 km. On these figures, Leederville tends to suit young adults, people living alone, and share households, while Mount Hawthorn suits families with children and couples.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Mount Hawthorn
ahead on 3 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more separate houses rather than flats (78% vs 39%)
- is already more of a family suburb (66% vs 34%)
- carries lower crime risk (44/100 vs 78/100)
- But Leederville has more schools inside the suburb (6 vs 2)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 3 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs house prices, unit prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Leederville
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has a bigger rental market to choose from (45% vs 26%)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Too close to call
Nothing among the 4 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
They split
one each way, out of the 5 things we measure here
- Leederville has more units and townhouses to downsize into (61% vs 22%)
- Mount Hawthorn carries lower crime risk (44/100 vs 78/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Leederville
ahead on 2 of the 2 things we measure here
- is growing faster (16.7% vs 8.4%)
- returns a higher gross yield on houses (4.5% vs 3.1%)
Weighs house yield and population growth.
Where they sit
Leederville and Mount Hawthorn drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Mount Hawthorn has more residents (8,183 vs 3,686); Mount Hawthorn has higher household incomes ($150,280 vs $120,432).
| Leederville | Mount Hawthorn | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,686 | 8,183 +122% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +16.7% | +8.4% |
| Median age | 35 | 37 |
| Median household income | $120,432/yr | $150,280/yr +25% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $430/wk +2% vs other | $420/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (26.5%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (28.6%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (7.0%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Leederville | Mount Hawthorn | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,700,000 | $1,697,500 |
| Median unit price | $778,000 | $713,750 |
| Median land price | — | $1,120,000 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 18 days from 24 sales | 23 days from 93 sales |
Unit price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
15 vs 9 sales
30 vs 18 sales
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
13 vs 22 sales
21 vs 52 sales
13 vs 35 sales
Development activity
| Leederville | Mount Hawthorn | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 219 across Vincent same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -73% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Leederville | Mount Hawthorn | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 4.5% $860/wk on $989K | 3.1% $950/wk on $1.6M |
| Units | 4.9% $750/wk on $799K | — |
Ranking within WA
| Leederville | Mount Hawthorn | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 86% of WA | Higher than 96% of WA |
| Schools | Higher than 39% of WA | — |
| Walkability | Higher than 99% of WA | Higher than 98% of WA |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 98% of WA same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 91% of WA | Higher than 92% of WA |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 60% of WA | Higher than 9% of WA |
| Rental yield (units) | Higher than 28% of WA | — |
Liveability
Mount Hawthorn scores higher overall (95 vs 77).
| Leederville | Mount Hawthorn | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | A | A+ |
| Score | 77/100 | 95/100 |
| Socio-economic band | very advantaged area decile 10/10 same for both | |
Risk profile
Leederville carries more crime risk (78 vs 44).
| Leederville | Mount Hawthorn | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Crime | High 78/100 | Moderate 44/100 |
| Flood | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 12 within 5 km | 11 within 5 km |
Schools
| Leederville | Mount Hawthorn | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 6 | 2 |
| Rated above peers | 1 | 0 |
| Rated at peers | 1 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 1 | 0 |
| Universities within 10 km | 3 ECU City Campus, 2.9 km | 3 ECU City Campus, 4.4 km |
| Full-time students aged 15–24 | 2.6% | 2.7% |
Schools in Leederville
- School Of Isolated and Distance Education Government · Combined above peers
- Aranmore Catholic College Catholic · Secondary at peers
- Aranmore Catholic Primary School Catholic · Primary below peers
- SEDA College WA (Leederville Second Campus) Independent · Secondary
- SEDA College WA (Leederville Third Campus) Independent · Secondary
- SEDA College WA (Leederville) Independent · Secondary
Schools in Mount Hawthorn
- Mount Hawthorn Primary School Government · Primary at peers
- Mount Hawthorn Education Support Centre Government · Primary · Special school
Amenities in the suburb
| Leederville | Mount Hawthorn | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 2 same for both | |
| Cafes & restaurants | 41 | 28 |
| Parks & reserves | 3 | 5 |
| Childcare | 3 | 5 |
| GPs | 1 | 2 |
| Pharmacies | 1 | 2 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 1 same for both | |
| Fuel stations | 1 | 0 |
| EV chargers | 1 | 0 |
Mobility
| Leederville | Mount Hawthorn | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 90/100 | 86/100 |
| Distance to Perth | 4.6 km | 6.5 km +41% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 10 min | 11 min |
| Public transport score | 94/100 Bus same for both | |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 100.5 7-9am + 5-7pm | 291.2 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 0 min scheduled, not actual same for both | |
| Electric vehicle share | 2.6% postcode 6007 | 2.6% postcode 6016 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 27 postcode 6007 | 34 postcode 6016 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (64.7%).
Setting
| Leederville | Mount Hawthorn | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 21 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 38 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 8.1 km | 7.5 km |
NBN connectivity
| Leederville | Mount Hawthorn | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 79/100 | 81/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the premises same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 36% 2,757 premises | 44% 3,845 premises |
Climate
| Leederville | Mount Hawthorn | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 650 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | — same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | — same for both | |
Council rates
| Leederville | Mount Hawthorn | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $3,974/yr same for both | |
| Council | Vincent same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Leederville | Mount Hawthorn | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Perth same for both | |
| Member | Patrick Gorman same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Leederville | Mount Hawthorn | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $800,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Leederville
Mount Hawthorn
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Leederville
Other comparisons with Mount Hawthorn
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.