Laverton North vs Williams Landing
Williams Landing is the younger of the two, with a median age of 31 against 56 in Laverton North. In Laverton North, most households rent, the large majority of homes are flats or apartments, and the large majority of households are people living alone. In Williams Landing, most households own their home, the large majority of homes are detached houses, and most households are couple families. Houses cost more in Laverton North: a median of $3.95 million, against $875,000 in Williams Landing, though rent is higher in Williams Landing. Laverton North is closer to the city centre: 20.1 km, against 24.8 km. On these figures, Laverton North tends to suit renters and people living alone, while Williams Landing suits young adults, families with children, and buyers on a tighter budget.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Williams Landing
ahead on 5 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more separate houses rather than flats (89% vs 6%)
- has more childcare (6 vs 0)
- is already more of a family suburb (77% vs 15%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Williams Landing
ahead on 3 of the 3 things we measure here
- has cheaper houses ($875,000 vs $3,950,000)
- has cheaper land ($915,500 vs $2,300,000)
- has cheaper units ($420,000 vs $973,250)
Weighs house prices, unit prices, and land prices.
Renters
Laverton North
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has cheaper rent ($240/wk vs $420/wk)
- has a bigger rental market to choose from (70% vs 40%)
- But Williams Landing leaves renters under less rental stress (16% vs 36%)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
They split
one each way, out of the 3 things we measure here
- Laverton North sits closer to the CBD (20.1 km vs 24.8 km)
- Williams Landing is more walkable (69/100 vs 25/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Williams Landing
ahead on 3 of the 5 things we measure here
- has more GPs (2 vs 0)
- is more walkable (69/100 vs 25/100)
- carries lower crime risk (69/100 vs 100/100)
- But Laverton North has more units and townhouses to downsize into (94% vs 11%)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Laverton North
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (63.0% vs 42.2%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Laverton North and Williams Landing drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Williams Landing has more residents (9,448 vs 119); Williams Landing has higher household incomes ($134,264 vs $34,788).
| Laverton North | Williams Landing | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 119 | 9,448 +7839% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +63.0% | +42.2% |
| Median age | 56 | 31 |
| Median household income | $34,788/yr | $134,264/yr +286% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $240/wk | $420/wk +75% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (35.3%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (21.5%).
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (21.0%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Laverton North | Williams Landing | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $3,950,000 | $875,000 |
| Median unit price | $973,250 | $420,000 |
| Median land price | $2,300,000 | $915,500 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | — | 36 days from 155 sales |
Zoning mix
Laverton North has more industrially zoned land (83% vs 0%); Williams Landing has more commercially zoned land (72% vs 0%).
| Laverton North | Williams Landing | |
|---|---|---|
| Industrial | 83% | 0% |
| Commercial | 0% | 72% |
| Residential | 0% | 19% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 10% | 7% |
| Parks and recreation | 7% | 2% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Laverton North | Williams Landing | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 4,045 across Wyndham same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -0% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Laverton North | Williams Landing | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | — | 3.8% $650/wk on $880K |
| Units | — | 5.5% $450/wk on $428K |
Ranking within VIC
| Laverton North | Williams Landing | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — | Higher than 60% of VIC |
| Income | Higher than 1% of VIC | — |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 81% of VIC | Higher than 90% of VIC |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 83% of VIC | Higher than 99% of VIC |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 95% of VIC | Higher than 98% of VIC |
| Rental yield (houses) | — | Higher than 57% of VIC |
| Rental yield (units) | — | Higher than 83% of VIC |
Liveability
Williams Landing is more walkable (69 vs 25).
| Laverton North | Williams Landing | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — | B |
| Score | — | 60/100 |
| Socio-economic band | high-need area decile 1/10 | very advantaged area decile 10/10 |
Risk profile
Laverton North carries more flood risk (18 vs 0); Williams Landing carries more bushfire risk (94 vs 13).
| Laverton North | Williams Landing | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Low 13/100 | High 94/100 |
| Crime | High 100/100 | Moderate 69/100 |
| Flood | Low 18/100 | None 0/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 42 within 5 km | 13 within 5 km |
Schools
| Laverton North | Williams Landing | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Laverton North | Williams Landing | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 0 | 1 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 4 | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | 5 | 12 |
| Childcare | 0 | 6 |
| GPs | 0 | 2 |
| Pharmacies | 0 | 1 |
| Fuel stations | 9 | 1 |
| Waterways | 15 | 0 |
Mobility
Williams Landing sits further from the CBD (24.8 km vs 20.1 km).
| Laverton North | Williams Landing | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 25/100 | 69/100 |
| Distance to Melbourne | 20.1 km | 24.8 km +23% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 25 min | 27 min |
| Public transport score | 79/100 Bus | 93/100 Rail · Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 104.8 7-9am + 5-7pm | 162.8 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 0 min scheduled, not actual same for both | |
| Electric vehicle share | 1.2% postcode 3026 | 3.4% postcode 3027 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 40 postcode 3026 | 46 postcode 3027 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (80.0%).
Setting
| Laverton North | Williams Landing | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 26 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 19 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 5.5 km | 6.3 km |
NBN connectivity
| Laverton North | Williams Landing | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 88/100 | 97/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the premises same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 59% 1,527 premises | 85% 3,804 premises |
Climate
| Laverton North | Williams Landing | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 482 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 25.9°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 6.2°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Laverton North | Williams Landing | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | — same for both | |
| PM10 | 23.2 µg/m³ | — |
| NO₂ | — same for both | |
Council rates
| Laverton North | Williams Landing | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,997/yr same for both | |
| Council | Wyndham same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Laverton North | Williams Landing | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Gellibrand same for both | |
| Member | Tim Watts same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Laverton North | Williams Landing | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Laverton North
Williams Landing
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Laverton North
Other comparisons with Williams Landing
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.