Latham vs Macgregor
Macgregor is the younger of the two, with a median age of 34 against 38 in Latham. In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Macgregor, about half of households are couple families. Latham is closer to the city centre: 14.1 km, against 16.4 km.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Too close to call
Nothing among the 6 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Latham
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper units ($450,000 vs $616,000)
Weighs house prices, unit prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Latham
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($400/wk vs $464/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Latham
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- is more walkable (59/100 vs 39/100)
- sits closer to the CBD (14.1 km vs 16.4 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Latham
ahead on 2 of the 5 things we measure here
- has more residents already 65 and over (16% vs 10%)
- is more walkable (59/100 vs 39/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Too close to call
Nothing among the 2 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs house yield and population growth.
Where they sit
Latham and Macgregor drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Macgregor has more residents (7,049 vs 3,767); Macgregor rents higher ($464/wk vs $400/wk).
| Latham | Macgregor | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,767 | 7,049 +87% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +3.7% same for both | |
| Median age | 38 | 34 |
| Median household income | $110,500/yr | $121,888/yr +10% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $400/wk | $464/wk +16% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (19.8%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (15.3%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (4.3%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Latham | Macgregor | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $850,000 | $840,000 |
| Median unit price | $450,000 | $616,000 |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 21 days from 56 sales | 20 days from 81 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
44 vs 101 sales
24 vs 39 sales
Development activity
| Latham | Macgregor | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 3,750 across Unincorporated ACT same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -48% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Latham | Macgregor | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 3.9% $700/wk on $935K | 4.3% $650/wk on $785K |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within ACT
| Latham | Macgregor | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 18% of ACT | Higher than 46% of ACT |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 44% of ACT | Higher than 25% of ACT |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 15% of ACT | Higher than 10% of ACT |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 21% of ACT | Higher than 61% of ACT |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 27% of ACT | Higher than 50% of ACT |
Liveability
Latham is more walkable (59 vs 39).
| Latham | Macgregor | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | C same for both | |
| Score | 39/100 | 35/100 |
| Socio-economic band | advantaged area decile 8/10 | very advantaged area decile 9/10 |
Risk profile
| Latham | Macgregor | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Low 29/100 | Low 30/100 |
| Crime | Low 33/100 | Low 29/100 |
| Flood | Moderate 52/100 | Moderate 47/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 1 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Latham | Macgregor | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 1 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 1 same for both | |
| Universities within 10 km | 2 UC - Canberra, Bruce, 6.3 km | 1 UC - Canberra, Bruce, 8.3 km |
| Full-time students aged 15–24 | 2.0% | 1.5% |
Schools in Latham
- Latham Primary School Government · Primary below peers
Schools in Macgregor
- Macgregor Primary School Government · Primary below peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Latham | Macgregor | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 1 | 0 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 1 | 0 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 same for both | |
| Childcare | 2 | 3 |
| EV chargers | 0 | 1 |
| Waterways | 1 | 0 |
Mobility
Macgregor sits further from the CBD (16.4 km vs 14.1 km).
| Latham | Macgregor | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 59/100 | 39/100 |
| Distance to Canberra | 14.1 km | 16.4 km +16% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 21 min | 24 min |
| Public transport score | 78/100 Bus | 79/100 Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 60.0 7-9am + 5-7pm | 105.0 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 1 min scheduled, not actual | 0 min scheduled, not actual |
| Electric vehicle share | 2.1% postcode 2615 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 40 postcode 2615 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (79.1%).
Setting
| Latham | Macgregor | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 562 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 553 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Latham | Macgregor | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 46/100 | 65/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the node same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 2% 1,514 premises | 36% 2,793 premises |
Climate
| Latham | Macgregor | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 622 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 28.5°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 0.8°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Latham | Macgregor | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 6.6 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 11.0 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.41 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Latham | Macgregor | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $3,105/yr same for both | |
| Council | Unincorporated ACT same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Latham | Macgregor | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Fenner same for both | |
| Member | Andrew Leigh same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Latham | Macgregor | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | Not offered same for both | |
| Property price cap | — same for both | |
| Eligibility | None same for both | |
Tags
Latham
Macgregor
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Latham
Other comparisons with Macgregor
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.