Lascelles vs Patchewollock
In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Lascelles, most households are couple families. On these figures, Lascelles tends to suit couples, while Patchewollock suits people living alone.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Patchewollock
ahead on 2 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more parks and reserves (21 vs 2)
- carries lower crime risk (34/100 vs 76/100)
- But Lascelles is already more of a family suburb (60% vs 49%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Lascelles
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- leaves renters under less rental stress (6% vs 17%)
- has cheaper rent ($100/wk vs $173/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Lascelles
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a shorter drive in (266 min vs 311 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (378.9 km vs 432.3 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Patchewollock
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- carries lower crime risk (34/100 vs 76/100)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Patchewollock
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (12.0% vs -11.8%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Lascelles and Patchewollock drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Patchewollock has more residents (149 vs 82); Patchewollock rents higher ($173/wk vs $100/wk).
| Lascelles | Patchewollock | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 82 | 149 +82% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | -11.8% | +12.0% |
| Median age | 47 same for both | |
| Median household income | $87,724/yr +40% vs other | $52,936/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $100/wk | $173/wk +73% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (23.2%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (19.5%).
Zoning mix
Lascelles has more rural and farming land (99% vs 49%).
| Lascelles | Patchewollock | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 99% | 49% |
| Parks and recreation | 0% | 50% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Lascelles | Patchewollock | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 17 across Yarriambiack | 446 across Mildura |
| Approvals change year on year | +300% | +29% |
Ranking within VIC
| Lascelles | Patchewollock | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 58% of VIC | Higher than 11% of VIC |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 61% of VIC | Higher than 19% of VIC |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | — same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 11% of VIC | Higher than 4% of VIC |
Liveability
| Lascelles | Patchewollock | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 4/10 same for both | |
Risk profile
Lascelles carries more crime risk (76 vs 34); Patchewollock carries more bushfire risk (76 vs 41).
| Lascelles | Patchewollock | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Moderate 41/100 | High 76/100 |
| Crime | High 76/100 | Low 34/100 |
| Flood | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Lascelles | Patchewollock | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Lascelles | Patchewollock | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 2 | 21 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 1 same for both | |
| Waterways | 0 | 10 |
Mobility
Patchewollock sits further from the CBD (432.3 km vs 378.9 km).
| Lascelles | Patchewollock | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 same for both | |
| Distance to Melbourne | 378.9 km | 432.3 km +14% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 266 min | 311 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.0% postcode 3487 | 0.0% postcode 3491 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (75.5%).
Setting
| Lascelles | Patchewollock | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 81 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 65 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Lascelles | Patchewollock | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 15/100 same for both | |
| Most common technology | Satellite (Sky Muster) same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 19 premises | 0% 24 premises |
Climate
| Lascelles | Patchewollock | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 300 mm | 310 mm |
| Summer max (Jan) | — | 32.6°C |
| Winter min (Jul) | — | 5.3°C |
Council rates
| Lascelles | Patchewollock | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,795/yr | $2,340/yr |
| Council | Yarriambiack | Mildura |
Federal electorate
| Lascelles | Patchewollock | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Mallee same for both | |
| Member | Anne Webster same for both | |
| Party | The Nationals same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Lascelles | Patchewollock | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Lascelles
Other comparisons with Patchewollock
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.