Larpent vs Nalangil
In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Larpent, about half of households are couple families. In Nalangil, most households are couple families. On these figures, Larpent tends to suit people living alone, while Nalangil suits couples.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
They split
one each way, out of the 6 things we measure here
- Larpent carries lower crime risk (46/100 vs 81/100)
- Nalangil is already more of a family suburb (70% vs 60%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Nalangil
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- leaves renters under less rental stress (10% vs 16%)
- has cheaper rent ($180/wk vs $260/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Larpent
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- sits closer to the CBD (161.8 km vs 165.4 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Larpent
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- carries lower crime risk (46/100 vs 81/100)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Larpent
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (3.1% vs -5.3%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Larpent and Nalangil drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Larpent has more residents (200 vs 72); Larpent rents higher ($260/wk vs $180/wk).
| Larpent | Nalangil | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 200 +64% vs other | 72 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +3.1% | -5.3% |
| Median age | 43 same for both | |
| Median household income | $82,836/yr | $88,816/yr +7% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $260/wk +31% vs other | $180/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (19.5%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (15.3%).
Zoning mix
| Larpent | Nalangil | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 99% | 92% |
| Parks and recreation | 0% | 8% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Larpent | Nalangil | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 226 across Colac Otway same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +64% same for both | |
Ranking within VIC
| Larpent | Nalangil | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 50% of VIC | Higher than 59% of VIC |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 1% of VIC | Higher than 18% of VIC |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 4% of VIC same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 48% of VIC | Higher than 54% of VIC |
Liveability
| Larpent | Nalangil | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 6/10 | below-average income decile 3/10 |
Risk profile
Larpent carries more bushfire risk (11 vs 0); Nalangil carries more crime risk (81 vs 46).
| Larpent | Nalangil | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Low 11/100 | None 0/100 |
| Crime | Moderate 46/100 | High 81/100 |
| Flood | Moderate 57/100 | Moderate 64/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Larpent | Nalangil | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Larpent | Nalangil | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 0 | 1 |
| Waterways | 2 | 1 |
Mobility
Nalangil sits further from the CBD (165.4 km vs 161.8 km).
| Larpent | Nalangil | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 same for both | |
| Distance to Melbourne | 161.8 km | 165.4 km +2% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 124 min | 123 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.1% postcode 3249 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 39 postcode 3249 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (63.2%).
Setting
| Larpent | Nalangil | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 142 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 133 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 44.6 km | 48.9 km |
NBN connectivity
| Larpent | Nalangil | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 30/100 same for both | |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 107 premises | 0% 32 premises |
Climate
| Larpent | Nalangil | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 607 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | — same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | — same for both | |
Council rates
| Larpent | Nalangil | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $2,023/yr same for both | |
| Council | Colac Otway same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Larpent | Nalangil | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Wannon same for both | |
| Member | Dan Tehan same for both | |
| Party | Liberal same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Larpent | Nalangil | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Larpent
Other comparisons with Nalangil
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.