Lancefield vs Pipers Creek
In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Lancefield, about half of households are couple families. In Pipers Creek, most households are couple families. On these figures, Pipers Creek tends to suit couples.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Lancefield
ahead on 4 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more parks and reserves (4 vs 0)
- has more childcare (3 vs 0)
- has more schools inside the suburb (2 vs 0)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Pipers Creek
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- leaves renters under less rental stress (12% vs 20%)
- has cheaper rent ($300/wk vs $360/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Pipers Creek
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- sits closer to the CBD (87.1 km vs 91.5 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Lancefield
ahead on 2 of the 4 things we measure here
- has more GPs (3 vs 0)
- carries lower crime risk (42/100 vs 60/100)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Pipers Creek
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (18.9% vs 11.7%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Lancefield and Pipers Creek drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Lancefield has more residents (2,743 vs 189); Pipers Creek has higher household incomes ($133,692 vs $95,576).
| Lancefield | Pipers Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,743 +93% vs other | 189 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +11.7% | +18.9% |
| Median age | 41 | 40 |
| Median household income | $95,576/yr | $133,692/yr +40% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $360/wk +17% vs other | $300/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (16.4%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (4.2%).
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (17.5%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Lancefield | Pipers Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $736,000 | — |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | $450,000 | — |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 58 days from 29 sales | — |
Zoning mix
Pipers Creek has more rural and farming land (74% vs 53%).
| Lancefield | Pipers Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 53% | 74% |
| Environmental | 27% | 26% |
| Parks and recreation | 15% | 0% |
| Residential | 4% | 0% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 1% | 0% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Lancefield | Pipers Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 331 across Macedon Ranges same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +80% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Lancefield | Pipers Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 3.3% $595/wk on $925K | — |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within VIC
| Lancefield | Pipers Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 42% of VIC | — |
| Income | Higher than 66% of VIC | Higher than 95% of VIC |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 20% of VIC | Higher than 22% of VIC |
| Affordability | Higher than 76% of VIC | — |
| EV adoption | Higher than 67% of VIC | Higher than 76% of VIC |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 75% of VIC | Higher than 34% of VIC |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 29% of VIC | — |
Liveability
| Lancefield | Pipers Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | C | — |
| Score | 46/100 | — |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 6/10 | very advantaged area decile 9/10 |
Risk profile
Pipers Creek carries more flood risk (30 vs 18); Pipers Creek carries more crime risk (60 vs 42).
| Lancefield | Pipers Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Moderate 52/100 | Moderate 55/100 |
| Crime | Moderate 42/100 | Moderate 60/100 |
| Flood | Low 18/100 | Low 30/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Lancefield | Pipers Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 2 | 0 |
| Rated above peers | 1 | 0 |
| Rated at peers | 1 | 0 |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Schools in Lancefield
- Lancefield Primary School Government · Primary above peers
- St Mary's School Catholic · Primary at peers
Schools in Pipers Creek
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Amenities in the suburb
| Lancefield | Pipers Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 1 | 0 |
| Parks & reserves | 4 | 0 |
| Childcare | 3 | 0 |
| GPs | 3 | 0 |
| Pharmacies | 1 | 0 |
| Police stations | 1 | 0 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 2 | 0 |
| Waterways | 10 | 2 |
Mobility
Lancefield sits further from the CBD (91.5 km vs 87.1 km).
| Lancefield | Pipers Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 same for both | |
| Distance to Melbourne | 91.5 km +5% vs other | 87.1 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 71 min | 67 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.7% postcode 3435 | 1.0% postcode 3444 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 54 postcode 3435 | 49 postcode 3444 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (67.5%).
Setting
| Lancefield | Pipers Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 456 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 521 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Lancefield | Pipers Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 62/100 | 28/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the premises | Fixed wireless |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 39% 1,304 premises | 0% 70 premises |
Climate
| Lancefield | Pipers Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 778 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | — same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | — same for both | |
Council rates
| Lancefield | Pipers Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $2,065/yr same for both | |
| Council | Macedon Ranges same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Lancefield | Pipers Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Mcewen | Bendigo |
| Member | Rob Mitchell | Lisa Chesters |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Lancefield | Pipers Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Lancefield
Other comparisons with Pipers Creek
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.