Lake Illawarra vs Mount Warrigal
In Lake Illawarra, about half of households rent and about half of households are people living alone. In Mount Warrigal, most households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. On these figures, Lake Illawarra tends to suit renters and people living alone.
Lake Illawarra and Mount Warrigal are neighbouring suburbs with notably different income profiles. Mount Warrigal has a median household income of $70,980 compared to Lake Illawarra's $55,588, and its rental market is stronger, with weekly rents at $405 versus $328. Lake Illawarra stands out for walkability, scoring 81 against Mount Warrigal's 64, making it more pedestrian-friendly despite a higher crime risk rating of 77. Both suburbs sit around 100 km from the CBD with no bushfire or flood risk, so your choice largely depends on whether you prioritise walkable neighbourhoods or access to higher-income communities.
Written by an AI language model from the figures below. Every number in it is checked against those figures before it is published.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Mount Warrigal
ahead on 4 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more separate houses rather than flats (98% vs 50%)
- has more parks and reserves (12 vs 7)
- is already more of a family suburb (66% vs 44%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Lake Illawarra
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper units ($717,500 vs $845,000)
Weighs house prices, unit prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Lake Illawarra
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a bigger rental market to choose from (50% vs 26%)
- has cheaper rent ($328/wk vs $405/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Lake Illawarra
ahead on 3 of the 4 things we measure here
- is more walkable (81/100 vs 64/100)
- has a shorter drive in (94 min vs 99 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (99.8 km vs 103.3 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Lake Illawarra
ahead on 2 of the 5 things we measure here
- has more units and townhouses to downsize into (50% vs 2%)
- is more walkable (81/100 vs 64/100)
- But Mount Warrigal carries lower crime risk (64/100 vs 80/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Mount Warrigal
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- returns a higher gross yield on houses (4.4% vs 3.6%)
Weighs house yield and population growth.
Where they sit
Lake Illawarra and Mount Warrigal drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Mount Warrigal has more residents (4,880 vs 3,288); Mount Warrigal has higher household incomes ($70,980 vs $55,588).
| Lake Illawarra | Mount Warrigal | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,288 | 4,880 +48% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +4.0% | -0.6% |
| Median age | 43 | 42 |
| Median household income | $55,588/yr | $70,980/yr +28% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $328/wk | $405/wk +23% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (16.1%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (19.1%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (4.7%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Lake Illawarra | Mount Warrigal | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $907,500 | $940,000 |
| Median unit price | $717,500 | $845,000 |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 25 days from 16 sales | 20 days from 29 sales |
Zoning mix
| Lake Illawarra | Mount Warrigal | |
|---|---|---|
| Residential | 63% | 83% |
| Parks and recreation | 27% | 14% |
| Environmental | 5% | 1% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 1% | 2% |
| Commercial | 2% | 0% |
| Industrial | 2% | 0% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Lake Illawarra | Mount Warrigal | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 883 across Shellharbour same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +25% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Lake Illawarra | Mount Warrigal | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 3.6% $650/wk on $950K | 4.4% $780/wk on $928K |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within NSW
| Lake Illawarra | Mount Warrigal | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 42% of NSW | Higher than 46% of NSW |
| Income | Higher than 16% of NSW | Higher than 34% of NSW |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 93% of NSW | Higher than 86% of NSW |
| Affordability | Higher than 29% of NSW | Higher than 44% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 30% of NSW same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 72% of NSW | Higher than 83% of NSW |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 48% of NSW | Higher than 88% of NSW |
Liveability
Lake Illawarra is more walkable (81 vs 64).
| Lake Illawarra | Mount Warrigal | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | C same for both | |
| Score | 44/100 | 48/100 |
| Socio-economic band | high-need area decile 1/10 | below-average income decile 2/10 |
Risk profile
Lake Illawarra carries more crime risk (80 vs 64).
| Lake Illawarra | Mount Warrigal | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Crime | High 80/100 | Moderate 64/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 1 within 5 km | 6 within 5 km |
Schools
| Lake Illawarra | Mount Warrigal | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 2 | 1 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 2 | 1 |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Schools in Lake Illawarra
- Lake Illawarra High School Government · Secondary at peers
- Lake Illawarra South Public School Government · Primary at peers
Schools in Mount Warrigal
- Mount Warrigal Public School Government · Primary at peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Lake Illawarra | Mount Warrigal | |
|---|---|---|
| Cafes & restaurants | 0 | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | 7 | 12 |
| Childcare | 1 | 2 |
| Pharmacies | 0 | 1 |
| Fuel stations | 1 | 0 |
Mobility
Mount Warrigal sits further from the CBD (103.3 km vs 99.8 km).
| Lake Illawarra | Mount Warrigal | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 81/100 | 64/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 99.8 km | 103.3 km +4% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 94 min | 99 min |
| Public transport score | 79/100 Bus | 78/100 Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 43.2 7-9am + 5-7pm | 62.0 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 1 min scheduled, not actual | 0 min scheduled, not actual |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.3% postcode 2528 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 31 postcode 2528 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (73.6%).
Setting
| Lake Illawarra | Mount Warrigal | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 3 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 38 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 412 m 3.2 km to a named beach | 2.4 km 3.2 km to a named beach |
NBN connectivity
| Lake Illawarra | Mount Warrigal | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 64/100 | 75/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the node | Fibre to the premises |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 35% 1,831 premises | 55% 1,992 premises |
Climate
| Lake Illawarra | Mount Warrigal | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 974 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | — same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | — same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Lake Illawarra | Mount Warrigal | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 5.1 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 14.3 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.37 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Lake Illawarra | Mount Warrigal | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,788/yr same for both | |
| Council | Shellharbour same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Lake Illawarra | Mount Warrigal | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Whitlam same for both | |
| Member | Carol Berry same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Lake Illawarra | Mount Warrigal | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Lake Illawarra
Other comparisons with Mount Warrigal
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.