Kongwak vs Lance Creek
Kongwak is the younger of the two, with a median age of 48 against 52 in Lance Creek. In both, the large majority of households own their home, the large majority of homes are detached houses, and most households are couple families. On these figures, Kongwak tends to suit people living alone, while Lance Creek suits couples.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Lance Creek
ahead on 2 of the 6 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (14/100 vs 40/100)
- is already more of a family suburb (83% vs 69%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Kongwak
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($138/wk vs $200/wk)
Weighs rent and rental stress.
Commuting to the city
Kongwak
ahead on 3 of the 3 things we measure here
- is more walkable (13/100 vs 0/100)
- has a shorter drive in (106 min vs 115 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (134.7 km vs 141.7 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
They split
one each way, out of the 4 things we measure here
- Kongwak is more walkable (13/100 vs 0/100)
- Lance Creek carries lower crime risk (14/100 vs 40/100)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Kongwak and Lance Creek drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Lance Creek rents higher ($200/wk vs $138/wk); Kongwak has more residents (207 vs 143).
| Kongwak | Lance Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 207 +31% vs other | 143 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +5.1% same for both | |
| Median age | 48 | 52 |
| Median household income | $84,500/yr | $118,820/yr +41% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $138/wk | $200/wk +45% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (25.9%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (4.9%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (18.9%).
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Kongwak | Lance Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $750,000 | — |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
Zoning mix
| Kongwak | Lance Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 97% | 96% |
| Parks and recreation | 1% | 3% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 1% same for both | |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Kongwak | Lance Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 170 across South Gippsland | 393 across Bass Coast |
| Approvals change year on year | +21% | +0% |
Ranking within VIC
| Kongwak | Lance Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 53% of VIC | Higher than 91% of VIC |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 74% of VIC | Higher than 16% of VIC |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 78% of VIC | Higher than 74% of VIC |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 38% of VIC | Higher than 53% of VIC |
Liveability
Kongwak is more walkable (13 vs 0).
| Kongwak | Lance Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | advantaged area decile 7/10 same for both | |
Risk profile
Kongwak carries more crime risk (40 vs 14); Lance Creek carries more flood risk (84 vs 72).
| Kongwak | Lance Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Crime | Moderate 40/100 | Low 14/100 |
| Flood | High 72/100 | High 84/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Kongwak | Lance Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 1 | 0 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 1 | 0 |
Schools in Kongwak
- Kongwak Primary School Government · Primary below peers
Schools in Lance Creek
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Amenities in the suburb
| Kongwak | Lance Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Waterways | 3 | 0 |
Mobility
Lance Creek sits further from the CBD (141.7 km vs 134.7 km).
| Kongwak | Lance Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 13/100 | 0/100 |
| Distance to Melbourne | 134.7 km | 141.7 km +5% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 106 min | 115 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 1.0% postcode 3951 | 0.9% postcode 3995 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 61 postcode 3951 | 47 postcode 3995 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (73.0%).
Setting
| Kongwak | Lance Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 67 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 46 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 13.8 km | 10.9 km |
NBN connectivity
| Kongwak | Lance Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 29/100 | 30/100 |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 111 premises | 0% 57 premises |
Climate
| Kongwak | Lance Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 906 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 24.6°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 6.9°C same for both | |
Council rates
| Kongwak | Lance Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $2,282/yr | $1,727/yr |
| Council | South Gippsland | Bass Coast |
Federal electorate
| Kongwak | Lance Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Monash same for both | |
| Member | Mary Aldred same for both | |
| Party | Liberal same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Kongwak | Lance Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Kongwak
Other comparisons with Lance Creek
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.