Kobble Creek vs Laceys Creek
In both, the large majority of households own their home, the large majority of homes are detached houses, and most households are couple families. Kobble Creek is closer to the city centre: 43.1 km, against 59.3 km.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Kobble Creek
ahead on 2 of the 6 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (13/100 vs 30/100)
- is already more of a family suburb (78% vs 68%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Laceys Creek
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has cheaper rent ($295/wk vs $500/wk)
- leaves renters under less rental stress (12% vs 19%)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Kobble Creek
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- sits closer to the CBD (43.1 km vs 59.3 km)
- has a shorter drive in (54 min vs 70 min)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Kobble Creek
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- carries lower crime risk (13/100 vs 30/100)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Kobble Creek and Laceys Creek drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Kobble Creek has more residents (654 vs 280); Kobble Creek rents higher ($500/wk vs $295/wk).
| Kobble Creek | Laceys Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 654 +57% vs other | 280 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +3.5% | +0.7% |
| Median age | 45 same for both | |
| Median household income | $137,644/yr +5% vs other | $131,196/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $500/wk +41% vs other | $295/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (25.4%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (7.5%).
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (19.3%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Kobble Creek | Laceys Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,512,500 | — |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
Development activity
| Kobble Creek | Laceys Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 6,996 across Moreton Bay same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +49% same for both | |
Ranking within QLD
| Kobble Creek | Laceys Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 95% of QLD | Higher than 93% of QLD |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 23% of QLD | Higher than 24% of QLD |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 96% of QLD | Higher than 87% of QLD |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 43% of QLD | Higher than 30% of QLD |
Liveability
| Kobble Creek | Laceys Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | B | — |
| Score | 57/100 | — |
| Socio-economic band | very advantaged area decile 10/10 | very advantaged area decile 9/10 |
Risk profile
Laceys Creek carries more crime risk (30 vs 13).
| Kobble Creek | Laceys Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Moderate 60/100 | Moderate 62/100 |
| Crime | Low 13/100 | Low 30/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Kobble Creek | Laceys Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Kobble Creek | Laceys Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 3 | 1 |
| Waterways | 10 | 46 |
Mobility
Laceys Creek sits further from the CBD (59.3 km vs 43.1 km).
| Kobble Creek | Laceys Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 same for both | |
| Distance to Brisbane | 43.1 km | 59.3 km +38% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 54 min | 70 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 2.4% postcode 4520 | 1.2% postcode 4521 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | — postcode 4520 | 98 postcode 4521 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (69.8%).
Setting
| Kobble Creek | Laceys Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 110 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 187 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 23.0 km | 29.6 km |
NBN connectivity
| Kobble Creek | Laceys Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 29/100 | 23/100 |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 225 premises | 0% 117 premises |
Climate
| Kobble Creek | Laceys Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 950 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | — same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | — same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Kobble Creek | Laceys Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 5.4 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 14.7 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.43 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Kobble Creek | Laceys Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,577/yr same for both | |
| Council | Moreton Bay same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Kobble Creek | Laceys Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Dickson same for both | |
| Member | Ali France same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Kobble Creek | Laceys Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $30,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Kobble Creek
Other comparisons with Laceys Creek
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.