Kingsholme vs Pimpama
Pimpama is the younger of the two, with a median age of 29 against 36 in Kingsholme. In both, the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Kingsholme, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of households are couple families. In Pimpama, most households rent and about half of households are couple families. Houses cost more in Kingsholme: a median of $1.8 million, against $960,000 in Pimpama. On these figures, Kingsholme tends to suit couples, while Pimpama suits renters, young adults, and buyers on a tighter budget.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
They split
one each way, out of the 6 things we measure here
- Kingsholme carries lower crime risk (31/100 vs 67/100)
- Pimpama has more childcare (20 vs 0)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Pimpama
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has cheaper land ($973,000 vs $2,075,000)
- has cheaper houses ($960,000 vs $1,800,000)
Weighs house prices, land prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
They split
one each way, out of the 3 things we measure here
- Kingsholme leaves renters under less rental stress (15% vs 24%)
- Pimpama has a bigger rental market to choose from (58% vs 6%)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Pimpama
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is more walkable (17/100 vs 0/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Pimpama
ahead on 2 of the 4 things we measure here
- is more walkable (17/100 vs 0/100)
- has more GPs (5 vs 0)
- But Kingsholme carries lower crime risk (31/100 vs 67/100)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Kingsholme
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (173.4% vs 161.8%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Kingsholme and Pimpama drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Pimpama has more residents (24,601 vs 782); Kingsholme has higher household incomes ($163,800 vs $96,876).
| Kingsholme | Pimpama | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 782 | 24,601 +3046% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +173.4% | +161.8% |
| Median age | 36 | 29 |
| Median household income | $163,800/yr +41% vs other | $96,876/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $460/wk +4% vs other | $440/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (22.4%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (16.0%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (10.9%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Kingsholme | Pimpama | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,800,000 | $960,000 |
| Median unit price | — | $737,000 |
| Median land price | $2,075,000 | $973,000 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | — | 23 days from 430 sales |
Development activity
| Kingsholme | Pimpama | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 7,196 across Gold Coast same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -35% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Kingsholme | Pimpama | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | — | 4.1% $750/wk on $950K |
| Units | — | 4.3% $695/wk on $850K |
Ranking within QLD
| Kingsholme | Pimpama | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 98% of QLD | Higher than 70% of QLD |
| Schools | — | Higher than 48% of QLD |
| Walkability | Higher than 19% of QLD | Higher than 77% of QLD |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 88% of QLD same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 97% of QLD | Higher than 96% of QLD |
| Rental yield (houses) | — | Higher than 61% of QLD |
| Rental yield (units) | — | Higher than 42% of QLD |
Liveability
Pimpama is more walkable (17 vs 0); Kingsholme scores higher overall (73 vs 50).
| Kingsholme | Pimpama | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | A | B |
| Score | 73/100 | 50/100 |
| Socio-economic band | very advantaged area decile 10/10 | mid-range socio-economic decile 5/10 |
Risk profile
Pimpama carries more crime risk (67 vs 31).
| Kingsholme | Pimpama | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Crime | Low 31/100 | Moderate 67/100 |
| Flood | — same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 3 within 5 km | 1 within 5 km |
Schools
| Kingsholme | Pimpama | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 | 7 |
| Rated above peers | 0 | 1 |
| Rated at peers | 0 | 4 |
| Rated below peers | 0 | 1 |
Schools in Kingsholme
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Schools in Pimpama
- Pimpama State School Government · Primary above peers
- Lutheran Ormeau Rivers District School Independent · Combined at peers
- Ormeau State School Government · Primary at peers
- Pimpama State Primary College Government · Primary at peers
- Pimpama State Secondary College Government · Secondary at peers
- Gainsborough State School Government · Primary below peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Kingsholme | Pimpama | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 0 | 5 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 0 | 11 |
| Parks & reserves | 5 | 18 |
| Childcare | 0 | 20 |
| GPs | 0 | 5 |
| Pharmacies | 0 | 2 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 0 | 2 |
| Fuel stations | 0 | 6 |
| EV chargers | 0 | 1 |
| Waterways | 10 | 7 |
Mobility
| Kingsholme | Pimpama | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 | 17/100 |
| Distance to Brisbane | 51.8 km | 52.9 km +2% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 45 min | 47 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 1.3% postcode 4208 | 1.3% postcode 4209 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 88 postcode 4208 | 61 postcode 4209 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (79.7%).
Setting
| Kingsholme | Pimpama | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 129 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 4 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 13.8 km | 6.2 km |
NBN connectivity
| Kingsholme | Pimpama | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 94/100 | 93/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the premises same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 88% 240 premises | 87% 8,619 premises |
Climate
| Kingsholme | Pimpama | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 1,682 mm | 1,351 mm |
| Summer max (Jan) | — | 28.9°C |
| Winter min (Jul) | — | 12.5°C |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Kingsholme | Pimpama | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 5.0 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 14.5 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.42 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Kingsholme | Pimpama | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,298/yr same for both | |
| Council | Gold Coast same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Kingsholme | Pimpama | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Forde | Fadden |
| Member | Rowan Holzberger | Cameron Caldwell |
| Party | Australian Labor Party | Liberal National Party of Queensland |
First Home Owner Grant
| Kingsholme | Pimpama | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $30,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Kingsholme
Other comparisons with Pimpama
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.