Kings Park vs Westbourne Park
Westbourne Park is the younger of the two, with a median age of 44 against 55 in Kings Park. In both, the large majority of households own their home and most homes are detached houses. In Kings Park, about half of households are people living alone. In Westbourne Park, about half of households are couple families. Houses cost more in Westbourne Park: a median of $1.87 million, against $1.19 million in Kings Park, though rent is higher in Kings Park. Kings Park is closer to the city centre: 5.3 km, against 6.4 km. On these figures, Kings Park tends to suit people living alone, older residents, and buyers on a tighter budget, while Westbourne Park suits couples.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Westbourne Park
ahead on 3 of the 6 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (29/100 vs 57/100)
- is already more of a family suburb (63% vs 48%)
- has more separate houses rather than flats (71% vs 59%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
They split
one each way, out of the 3 things we measure here
- Kings Park has cheaper houses ($1,185,000 vs $1,873,500)
- Westbourne Park has cheaper units ($636,250 vs $775,500)
Weighs house prices, unit prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Westbourne Park
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- leaves renters under less rental stress (14% vs 21%)
- has cheaper rent ($305/wk vs $350/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Too close to call
Nothing among the 4 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Kings Park
ahead on 2 of the 5 things we measure here
- has more residents already 65 and over (37% vs 24%)
- has more units and townhouses to downsize into (41% vs 29%)
- But Westbourne Park carries lower crime risk (29/100 vs 57/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Kings Park
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (5.3% vs 0.0%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Kings Park and Westbourne Park drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Westbourne Park has more residents (2,564 vs 574); Westbourne Park has higher household incomes ($112,528 vs $85,644).
| Kings Park | Westbourne Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 574 | 2,564 +347% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +5.3% | +0.0% |
| Median age | 55 | 44 |
| Median household income | $85,644/yr | $112,528/yr +31% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $350/wk +13% vs other | $305/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (18.8%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (25.4%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (7.1%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Kings Park | Westbourne Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,185,000 | $1,873,500 |
| Median unit price | $775,500 | $636,250 |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | — | 17 days from 10 sales |
Zoning mix
| Kings Park | Westbourne Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Residential | 94% | 98% |
| Commercial | 6% | 0% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 0% | 2% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Kings Park | Westbourne Park | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 273 across Unley | 188 across Mitcham |
| Approvals change year on year | -67% | +32% |
Gross rental yield
| Kings Park | Westbourne Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | — | 2.4% $658/wk on $1.4M |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within SA
| Kings Park | Westbourne Park | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 87% of SA | Higher than 96% of SA |
| Income | Higher than 63% of SA | Higher than 88% of SA |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 94% of SA | Higher than 99% of SA |
| Affordability | Higher than 9% of SA | Higher than 8% of SA |
| EV adoption | Higher than 90% of SA | Higher than 83% of SA |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 82% of SA | Higher than 93% of SA |
| Rental yield (houses) | — | Higher than 6% of SA |
Liveability
| Kings Park | Westbourne Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | A+ same for both | |
| Score | 87/100 same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | very advantaged area decile 10/10 same for both | |
Risk profile
Westbourne Park carries more flood risk (71 vs 14); Kings Park carries more crime risk (57 vs 29).
| Kings Park | Westbourne Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Crime | Moderate 57/100 | Low 29/100 |
| Flood | Low 14/100 | High 71/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 7 within 5 km | 5 within 5 km |
Schools
| Kings Park | Westbourne Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 | 1 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 | 1 |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
| Universities within 10 km | 3 Adelaide University, Adelaide City Campus, 4.0 km | 3 Tonsley, 3.7 km |
| Full-time students aged 15–24 | 4.2% | 4.1% |
Schools in Kings Park
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Schools in Westbourne Park
- Westbourne Park Primary School Government · Primary at peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Kings Park | Westbourne Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 0 | 1 |
| Childcare | 0 | 2 |
| GPs | 1 | 0 |
| Pharmacies | 1 | 0 |
| Fuel stations | 0 | 1 |
Mobility
| Kings Park | Westbourne Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 83/100 | 90/100 |
| Distance to Adelaide | 5.3 km | 6.4 km +21% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 11 min | 12 min |
| Public transport score | 78/100 Bus | 79/100 Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 29.8 7-9am + 5-7pm | 41.0 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 1 min scheduled, not actual same for both | |
| Electric vehicle share | 1.7% postcode 5034 | 1.3% postcode 5041 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 51 postcode 5034 | 58 postcode 5041 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (65.6%).
Setting
| Kings Park | Westbourne Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 51 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 55 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 7.5 km | 7.6 km |
NBN connectivity
| Kings Park | Westbourne Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 70/100 | 81/100 |
| Most common technology | Hybrid fibre-coaxial | Fibre to the curb |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 8% 382 premises | 32% 1,275 premises |
Climate
| Kings Park | Westbourne Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 457 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 29.1°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 8.5°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Kings Park | Westbourne Park | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 6.0 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 17.8 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 1.12 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Kings Park | Westbourne Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $2,288/yr | $2,296/yr |
| Council | Unley | Mitcham |
Federal electorate
| Kings Park | Westbourne Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Boothby same for both | |
| Member | Louise Miller-Frost same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Kings Park | Westbourne Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $15,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | — same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Kings Park
Westbourne Park
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Kings Park
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.