Kings Park vs Hawthorn
Hawthorn is the younger of the two, with a median age of 43 against 55 in Kings Park. In both, the large majority of households own their home and most homes are detached houses. In Kings Park, about half of households are people living alone. In Hawthorn, about half of households are couple families. Houses cost more in Hawthorn: a median of $1.8 million, against $1.19 million in Kings Park, though rent is higher in Kings Park. Kings Park is closer to the city centre: 5.3 km, against 6.1 km. On these figures, Kings Park tends to suit people living alone, older residents, and buyers on a tighter budget, while Hawthorn suits couples.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Hawthorn
ahead on 3 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more parks and reserves (7 vs 0)
- is already more of a family suburb (63% vs 48%)
- has more separate houses rather than flats (73% vs 59%)
- But Kings Park carries lower crime risk (57/100 vs 69/100)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
They split
one each way, out of the 3 things we measure here
- Kings Park has cheaper houses ($1,185,000 vs $1,800,000)
- Hawthorn has cheaper units ($571,083 vs $775,500)
Weighs house prices, unit prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Hawthorn
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- leaves renters under less rental stress (12% vs 21%)
- has cheaper rent ($295/wk vs $350/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Hawthorn
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is more walkable (91/100 vs 83/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Kings Park
ahead on 3 of the 5 things we measure here
- has more residents already 65 and over (37% vs 21%)
- has more units and townhouses to downsize into (41% vs 27%)
- carries lower crime risk (57/100 vs 69/100)
- But Hawthorn is more walkable (91/100 vs 83/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Kings Park and Hawthorn drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Hawthorn has more residents (2,221 vs 574); Hawthorn has higher household incomes ($123,240 vs $85,644).
| Kings Park | Hawthorn | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 574 | 2,221 +287% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +5.3% | +2.5% |
| Median age | 55 | 43 |
| Median household income | $85,644/yr | $123,240/yr +44% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $350/wk +16% vs other | $295/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (18.8%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (26.0%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (7.1%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Kings Park | Hawthorn | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,185,000 | $1,800,000 |
| Median unit price | $775,500 | $571,083 |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | — | 19 days from 7 sales |
Zoning mix
| Kings Park | Hawthorn | |
|---|---|---|
| Residential | 94% | 90% |
| Commercial | 6% | 5% |
| Parks and recreation | 0% | 4% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 0% | 1% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Kings Park | Hawthorn | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 273 across Unley | 188 across Mitcham |
| Approvals change year on year | -67% | +32% |
Ranking within SA
| Kings Park | Hawthorn | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 87% of SA | Higher than 91% of SA |
| Income | Higher than 63% of SA | Higher than 94% of SA |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 94% of SA | Higher than 99% of SA |
| Affordability | Higher than 9% of SA | Higher than 25% of SA |
| EV adoption | Higher than 90% of SA | Higher than 97% of SA |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 82% of SA | Higher than 91% of SA |
Liveability
Kings Park scores higher overall (87 vs 75); Hawthorn is more walkable (91 vs 83).
| Kings Park | Hawthorn | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | A+ | A |
| Score | 87/100 | 75/100 |
| Socio-economic band | very advantaged area decile 10/10 same for both | |
Risk profile
Hawthorn carries more flood risk (75 vs 14); Hawthorn carries more crime risk (69 vs 57).
| Kings Park | Hawthorn | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Crime | Moderate 57/100 | Moderate 69/100 |
| Flood | Low 14/100 | High 75/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 7 within 5 km | 5 within 5 km |
Schools
| Kings Park | Hawthorn | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
| Universities within 10 km | 3 Adelaide University, Adelaide City Campus, 4.0 km | 3 Tonsley, 4.3 km |
| Full-time students aged 15–24 | 4.2% | 4.6% |
Amenities in the suburb
| Kings Park | Hawthorn | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 0 | 1 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 0 | 4 |
| Parks & reserves | 0 | 7 |
| Childcare | 0 | 2 |
| GPs | 1 | 2 |
| Pharmacies | 1 | 0 |
| Waterways | 0 | 6 |
Mobility
| Kings Park | Hawthorn | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 83/100 | 91/100 |
| Distance to Adelaide | 5.3 km | 6.1 km +15% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 11 min | 13 min |
| Public transport score | 78/100 Bus | 90/100 Rail · Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 29.8 7-9am + 5-7pm | 80.0 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 1 min scheduled, not actual same for both | |
| Electric vehicle share | 1.7% postcode 5034 | 2.5% postcode 5062 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 51 postcode 5034 | 63 postcode 5062 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (67.7%).
Setting
| Kings Park | Hawthorn | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 51 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 67 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 7.5 km | 8.4 km |
NBN connectivity
| Kings Park | Hawthorn | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 70/100 | 77/100 |
| Most common technology | Hybrid fibre-coaxial | Fibre to the premises |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 8% 382 premises | 32% 1,062 premises |
Climate
| Kings Park | Hawthorn | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 457 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 29.1°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 8.5°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Kings Park | Hawthorn | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 6.0 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 17.8 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 1.12 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Kings Park | Hawthorn | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $2,288/yr | $2,296/yr |
| Council | Unley | Mitcham |
Federal electorate
| Kings Park | Hawthorn | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Boothby same for both | |
| Member | Louise Miller-Frost same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Kings Park | Hawthorn | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $15,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | — same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Kings Park
Hawthorn
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Kings Park
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.