Kings Park vs Acacia Gardens
In both, the large majority of households own their home, the large majority of homes are detached houses, and most households are couple families. Houses cost more in Acacia Gardens: a median of $1.33 million, against $1.21 million in Kings Park, and rent is higher there too. On these figures, Acacia Gardens tends to suit couples.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Acacia Gardens
ahead on 2 of the 6 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (27/100 vs 71/100)
- is already more of a family suburb (86% vs 72%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Acacia Gardens
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper units ($935,000 vs $1,180,000)
Weighs house prices, unit prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Kings Park
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($445/wk vs $540/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Too close to call
Nothing among the 4 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Acacia Gardens
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- carries lower crime risk (27/100 vs 71/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Kings Park and Acacia Gardens drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Acacia Gardens has higher household incomes ($145,392 vs $113,672); Acacia Gardens rents higher ($540/wk vs $445/wk).
| Kings Park | Acacia Gardens | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,476 | 3,668 +6% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +0.7% | -3.4% |
| Median age | 37 | 36 |
| Median household income | $113,672/yr | $145,392/yr +28% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $445/wk | $540/wk +21% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (18.8%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (19.1%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (16.7%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Kings Park | Acacia Gardens | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,214,000 | $1,330,000 |
| Median unit price | $1,180,000 | $935,000 |
| Median land price | $1,126,356 | — |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 21 days from 29 sales | 28 days from 27 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
47 vs 28 sales
24 vs 43 sales
Zoning mix
Kings Park has more industrially zoned land (47% vs 0%).
| Kings Park | Acacia Gardens | |
|---|---|---|
| Residential | 37% | 75% |
| Industrial | 47% | 0% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 9% | 19% |
| Parks and recreation | 6% | 7% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Kings Park | Acacia Gardens | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 2,325 across Blacktown same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -18% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Kings Park | Acacia Gardens | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 3.3% $688/wk on $1.1M | — |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within NSW
| Kings Park | Acacia Gardens | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 62% of NSW | Higher than 69% of NSW |
| Income | — | Higher than 94% of NSW |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 87% of NSW | Higher than 88% of NSW |
| Affordability | — | Higher than 71% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 71% of NSW | Higher than 90% of NSW |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 90% of NSW | Higher than 88% of NSW |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 32% of NSW | — |
Liveability
Acacia Gardens scores higher overall (81 vs 64).
| Kings Park | Acacia Gardens | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | B | A |
| Score | 64/100 | 81/100 |
| Socio-economic band | advantaged area decile 8/10 | very advantaged area decile 10/10 |
Risk profile
Kings Park carries more crime risk (71 vs 27).
| Kings Park | Acacia Gardens | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Crime | High 71/100 | Low 27/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 4 within 5 km | 3 within 5 km |
Schools
| Kings Park | Acacia Gardens | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 | 1 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 | 1 |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Schools in Kings Park
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Schools in Acacia Gardens
- Quakers Hill East Public School Government · Primary at peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Kings Park | Acacia Gardens | |
|---|---|---|
| Cafes & restaurants | 2 | 0 |
| Parks & reserves | 2 | 1 |
| Childcare | 1 | 2 |
| Fuel stations | 3 | 0 |
Mobility
| Kings Park | Acacia Gardens | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 67/100 | 68/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 40 km | 40.3 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 37 min same for both | |
| Public transport score | 77/100 Bus | 79/100 Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 44.8 7-9am + 5-7pm | 72.0 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 1 min scheduled, not actual same for both | |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.7% postcode 2148 | 1.5% postcode 2763 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 35 postcode 2148 | 53 postcode 2763 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (49.4%).
Setting
| Kings Park | Acacia Gardens | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 61 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 88 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 32.2 km | 32.0 km |
NBN connectivity
| Kings Park | Acacia Gardens | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 82/100 | 78/100 |
| Most common technology | Hybrid fibre-coaxial | Fibre to the premises |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 27% 1,817 premises | 51% 1,183 premises |
Climate
| Kings Park | Acacia Gardens | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 932 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | — same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | — same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Kings Park | Acacia Gardens | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 6.7 µg/m³ | 6.1 µg/m³ |
| PM10 | 17.6 µg/m³ | 15.5 µg/m³ |
| NO₂ | 0.88 pphm | 0.53 pphm |
Council rates
| Kings Park | Acacia Gardens | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,157/yr same for both | |
| Council | Blacktown same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Kings Park | Acacia Gardens | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Greenway same for both | |
| Member | Michelle Rowland same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Kings Park | Acacia Gardens | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Kings Park
Acacia Gardens
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Kings Park
Other comparisons with Acacia Gardens
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.