Kingfisher Shores vs Mannering Park
In both, most households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Kingfisher Shores, about half of households are people living alone. Houses cost more in Kingfisher Shores: a median of $1.08 million, against $826,000 in Mannering Park. On these figures, Kingfisher Shores tends to suit people living alone, while Mannering Park suits families with children and buyers on a tighter budget.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Mannering Park
ahead on 2 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more parks and reserves (4 vs 1)
- is already more of a family suburb (61% vs 40%)
- But Kingfisher Shores carries lower crime risk (25/100 vs 60/100)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Mannering Park
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper houses ($826,500 vs $1,080,500)
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
Mannering Park
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has a bigger rental market to choose from (29% vs 16%)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Kingfisher Shores
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is more walkable (32/100 vs 23/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Kingfisher Shores
ahead on 2 of the 4 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (25/100 vs 60/100)
- is more walkable (32/100 vs 23/100)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Mannering Park
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (3.3% vs -1.8%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Kingfisher Shores and Mannering Park drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Mannering Park has more residents (2,554 vs 160); Kingfisher Shores has higher household incomes ($79,612 vs $72,332).
| Kingfisher Shores | Mannering Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 160 | 2,554 +1496% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | -1.8% | +3.3% |
| Median age | 41 same for both | |
| Median household income | $79,612/yr +9% vs other | $72,332/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $385/wk +2% vs other | $378/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (15.0%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (6.2%).
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (23.8%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Kingfisher Shores | Mannering Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,080,500 | $826,500 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | — | 31 days from 22 sales |
Zoning mix
Kingfisher Shores has more rural and farming land (53% vs 0%).
| Kingfisher Shores | Mannering Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Infrastructure and transport | 1% | 79% |
| Rural and farming | 53% | 0% |
| Parks and recreation | 18% | 3% |
| Residential | 15% | 14% |
| Environmental | 13% | 5% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Kingfisher Shores | Mannering Park | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 1,441 across Central Coast (NSW) same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +67% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Kingfisher Shores | Mannering Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | — | 3.8% $600/wk on $830K |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within NSW
| Kingfisher Shores | Mannering Park | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 56% of NSW | Higher than 36% of NSW |
| Income | Higher than 47% of NSW | Higher than 39% of NSW |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 76% of NSW | Higher than 71% of NSW |
| Affordability | Higher than 41% of NSW | Higher than 54% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 66% of NSW | Higher than 65% of NSW |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 74% of NSW | Higher than 79% of NSW |
| Rental yield (houses) | — | Higher than 60% of NSW |
Liveability
Kingfisher Shores is more walkable (32 vs 23).
| Kingfisher Shores | Mannering Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — | D |
| Score | — | 19/100 |
| Socio-economic band | below-average income decile 3/10 | below-average income decile 2/10 |
Risk profile
Mannering Park carries more crime risk (60 vs 25); Kingfisher Shores carries more bushfire risk (93 vs 76).
| Kingfisher Shores | Mannering Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | High 93/100 | High 76/100 |
| Crime | Low 25/100 | Moderate 60/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 5 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Kingfisher Shores | Mannering Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 | 1 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 | 1 |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Schools in Kingfisher Shores
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Schools in Mannering Park
- Mannering Park Public School Government · Primary at peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Kingfisher Shores | Mannering Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 4 |
| Childcare | 0 | 2 |
| GPs | 0 | 1 |
| Pharmacies | 0 | 1 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 0 | 1 |
| Waterways | 0 | 1 |
Mobility
| Kingfisher Shores | Mannering Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 32/100 | 23/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 113.1 km | 113.4 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 89 min | 93 min |
| Public transport score | 30/100 Bus | 67/100 Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 9.0 7-9am + 5-7pm | 51.0 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 1 min scheduled, not actual same for both | |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.6% postcode 2259 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 56 postcode 2259 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (75.6%).
Setting
| Kingfisher Shores | Mannering Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 7 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 13 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 6.0 km | 7.5 km |
NBN connectivity
| Kingfisher Shores | Mannering Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 66/100 | 73/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the node | Fibre to the premises |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 40% 77 premises | 51% 1,152 premises |
Climate
| Kingfisher Shores | Mannering Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 1,272 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 26.4°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 10.6°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Kingfisher Shores | Mannering Park | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 5.0 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 11.6 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.27 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Kingfisher Shores | Mannering Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,409/yr same for both | |
| Council | Central Coast (NSW) same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Kingfisher Shores | Mannering Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Shortland same for both | |
| Member | Pat Conroy same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Kingfisher Shores | Mannering Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Kingfisher Shores
Mannering Park
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Kingfisher Shores
Other comparisons with Mannering Park
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.