King Scrub vs Mount Pleasant
King Scrub is the younger of the two, with a median age of 40 against 46 in Mount Pleasant. In both, the large majority of households own their home, the large majority of homes are detached houses, and most households are couple families. King Scrub is closer to the city centre: 48.3 km, against 54.3 km. On these figures, King Scrub tends to suit couples.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
King Scrub
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is already more of a family suburb (95% vs 72%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
King Scrub
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- leaves households under less mortgage stress (18% vs 24%)
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
King Scrub
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- leaves renters under less rental stress (12% vs 19%)
- has cheaper rent ($360/wk vs $400/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
King Scrub
ahead on 4 of the 4 things we measure here
- is more walkable (10/100 vs 0/100)
- gets more of its commuters onto trains and trams (9% vs 2%)
- sits closer to the CBD (48.3 km vs 54.3 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
They split
one each way, out of the 4 things we measure here
- King Scrub is more walkable (10/100 vs 0/100)
- Mount Pleasant has more residents already 65 and over (17% vs 10%)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Mount Pleasant
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (17.5% vs 4.3%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
King Scrub and Mount Pleasant drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
King Scrub has higher household incomes ($150,540 vs $108,004); Mount Pleasant skews older (46 vs 40).
| King Scrub | Mount Pleasant | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 363 | 390 +7% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +4.3% | +17.5% |
| Median age | 40 | 46 |
| Median household income | $150,540/yr +28% vs other | $108,004/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $360/wk | $400/wk +11% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (21.3%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (5.0%).
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (16.5%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| King Scrub | Mount Pleasant | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | — same for both | |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | $1,100,000 | — |
Development activity
| King Scrub | Mount Pleasant | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 6,996 across Moreton Bay same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +49% same for both | |
Ranking within QLD
| King Scrub | Mount Pleasant | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | — | Higher than 80% of QLD |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 70% of QLD | Higher than 8% of QLD |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 87% of QLD same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 68% of QLD | Higher than 37% of QLD |
Liveability
King Scrub is more walkable (10 vs 0).
| King Scrub | Mount Pleasant | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | very advantaged area decile 9/10 same for both | |
Risk profile
| King Scrub | Mount Pleasant | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Crime | Low 21/100 | Low 26/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| King Scrub | Mount Pleasant | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| King Scrub | Mount Pleasant | |
|---|---|---|
| Cafes & restaurants | 0 | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 0 |
| Waterways | 5 same for both | |
Mobility
Mount Pleasant sits further from the CBD (54.3 km vs 48.3 km).
| King Scrub | Mount Pleasant | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 10/100 | 0/100 |
| Distance to Brisbane | 48.3 km | 54.3 km +12% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 57 min | 64 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 1.2% postcode 4521 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 98 postcode 4521 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (63.6%).
Setting
| King Scrub | Mount Pleasant | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 80 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 124 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 20.7 km | 26.5 km |
NBN connectivity
| King Scrub | Mount Pleasant | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 43/100 | 28/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the node | Fixed wireless |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 5% 122 premises | 0% 130 premises |
Climate
| King Scrub | Mount Pleasant | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 950 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | — same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | — same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| King Scrub | Mount Pleasant | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 5.4 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 14.7 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.43 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| King Scrub | Mount Pleasant | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,577/yr same for both | |
| Council | Moreton Bay same for both | |
Federal electorate
| King Scrub | Mount Pleasant | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Dickson same for both | |
| Member | Ali France same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| King Scrub | Mount Pleasant | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $30,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
King Scrub
Mount Pleasant
More comparisons
Other comparisons with King Scrub
Other comparisons with Mount Pleasant
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.