King River vs Lower King
Comparing King River and Lower King, WA: King River carries more bushfire risk (63 vs 0); Lower King is more walkable (14 vs 0); and Lower King has more residents (1,890 vs 278).
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Lower King
ahead on 2 of the 6 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (26/100 vs 50/100)
- has more separate houses rather than flats (99% vs 83%)
- But King River has more parks and reserves (3 vs 0)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
King River
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- leaves renters under less rental stress (15% vs 22%)
- has cheaper rent ($273/wk vs $320/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
King River
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a shorter drive in (288 min vs 296 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (414.8 km vs 419.3 km)
- But Lower King is more walkable (14/100 vs 0/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Lower King
ahead on 2 of the 5 things we measure here
- is more walkable (14/100 vs 0/100)
- carries lower crime risk (26/100 vs 50/100)
- But King River has more units and townhouses to downsize into (17% vs 1%)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
King River and Lower King drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Lower King has more residents (1,890 vs 278); King River has higher household incomes ($91,936 vs $75,296).
| King River | Lower King | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 278 | 1,890 +580% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +3.3% | +3.2% |
| Median age | 50 | 48 |
| Median household income | $91,936/yr +18% vs other | $75,296/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $273/wk | $320/wk +17% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (18.0%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (9.4%).
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (18.7%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| King River | Lower King | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | — | $817,000 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — | $664,000 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | — | 21 days from 18 sales |
Development activity
| King River | Lower King | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 271 across Albany same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -28% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| King River | Lower King | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | — | 4.1% $780/wk on $1M |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within WA
| King River | Lower King | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 56% of WA | Higher than 37% of WA |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 44% of WA | Higher than 72% of WA |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 39% of WA | Higher than 36% of WA |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 62% of WA | Higher than 75% of WA |
| Rental yield (houses) | — | Higher than 28% of WA |
Liveability
Lower King is more walkable (14 vs 0).
| King River | Lower King | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — | B |
| Score | — | 56/100 |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 4/10 | mid-range socio-economic decile 6/10 |
Risk profile
King River carries more bushfire risk (63 vs 0); King River carries more flood risk (16 vs 0).
| King River | Lower King | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Moderate 63/100 | None 0/100 |
| Crime | Moderate 50/100 | Low 26/100 |
| Flood | Low 16/100 | None 0/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 | Moderate 48/100 |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 1 within 5 km | 0 within 5 km |
Schools
| King River | Lower King | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| King River | Lower King | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 3 | 0 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 0 | 1 |
| Fuel stations | 1 same for both | |
| Waterways | 1 same for both | |
Mobility
Lower King sits further from the CBD (419.3 km vs 414.8 km).
| King River | Lower King | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 | 14/100 |
| Distance to Perth | 414.8 km | 419.3 km +1% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 288 min | 296 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.3% postcode 6330 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 31 postcode 6330 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (87.0%).
Setting
| King River | Lower King | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 23 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 0 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 3.9 km | 760 m |
NBN connectivity
| King River | Lower King | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 30/100 | 62/100 |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless | Fibre to the node |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 113 premises | 34% 863 premises |
Climate
| King River | Lower King | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 859 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 22.4°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 9.6°C same for both | |
Council rates
| King River | Lower King | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $2,591/yr same for both | |
| Council | Albany same for both | |
Federal electorate
| King River | Lower King | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | O'connor same for both | |
| Member | Rick Wilson same for both | |
| Party | Liberal same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| King River | Lower King | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $800,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with King River
Other comparisons with Lower King
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.