Kincumber vs Saratoga
Saratoga is the younger of the two, with a median age of 43 against 48 in Kincumber. In both, the large majority of households own their home and most homes are detached houses. In Saratoga, about half of households are couple families. Houses cost more in Saratoga: a median of $1.3 million, against $1.14 million in Kincumber, and rent is higher there too. On these figures, Kincumber tends to suit people living alone and older residents, while Saratoga suits couples.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
They split
one each way, out of the 6 things we measure here
- Kincumber has more childcare (6 vs 1)
- Saratoga carries lower crime risk (20/100 vs 49/100)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Kincumber
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has cheaper units ($785,000 vs $965,000)
- has cheaper houses ($1,140,000 vs $1,300,000)
- But Saratoga leaves households under less mortgage stress (25% vs 36%)
Weighs house prices, unit prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
They split
one each way, out of the 3 things we measure here
- Kincumber has cheaper rent ($400/wk vs $485/wk)
- Saratoga leaves renters under less rental stress (24% vs 30%)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Too close to call
Nothing among the 4 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Kincumber
ahead on 3 of the 5 things we measure here
- has more units and townhouses to downsize into (35% vs 5%)
- has more GPs (3 vs 1)
- has more residents already 65 and over (31% vs 20%)
- But Saratoga carries lower crime risk (20/100 vs 49/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Kincumber
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- returns a higher gross yield on houses (3.5% vs 2.8%)
Weighs house yield and population growth.
Where they sit
Kincumber and Saratoga drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Kincumber has more residents (7,398 vs 3,982); Saratoga has higher household incomes ($103,428 vs $68,692).
| Kincumber | Saratoga | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 7,398 +46% vs other | 3,982 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +4.3% | +1.1% |
| Median age | 48 | 43 |
| Median household income | $68,692/yr | $103,428/yr +51% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $400/wk | $485/wk +21% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (14.2%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (18.6%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (7.2%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Kincumber | Saratoga | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,140,000 | $1,300,000 |
| Median unit price | $785,000 | $965,000 |
| Median land price | $2,160,000 | — |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 20 days from 95 sales | 32 days from 48 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
60 vs 41 sales
54 vs 29 sales
17 vs 6 sales
Zoning mix
Kincumber has more land zoned for conservation (54% vs 20%).
| Kincumber | Saratoga | |
|---|---|---|
| Residential | 23% | 61% |
| Environmental | 54% | 20% |
| Parks and recreation | 10% | 17% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 12% | 1% |
| Industrial | 1% | 0% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Kincumber | Saratoga | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 1,441 across Central Coast (NSW) same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +67% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Kincumber | Saratoga | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 3.5% $750/wk on $1.1M | 2.8% $880/wk on $1.62M |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within NSW
| Kincumber | Saratoga | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 59% of NSW | Higher than 70% of NSW |
| Income | — | Higher than 71% of NSW |
| Schools | Higher than 14% of NSW | — |
| Walkability | Higher than 81% of NSW | Higher than 84% of NSW |
| Affordability | — | Higher than 43% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 84% of NSW same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 70% of NSW | Higher than 66% of NSW |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 47% of NSW | Higher than 15% of NSW |
Liveability
Saratoga scores higher overall (67 vs 45).
| Kincumber | Saratoga | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | C | B |
| Score | 45/100 | 67/100 |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 6/10 | very advantaged area decile 9/10 |
Risk profile
Kincumber carries more crime risk (49 vs 20).
| Kincumber | Saratoga | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Low 19/100 | Low 28/100 |
| Crime | Moderate 49/100 | Low 20/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 3 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Kincumber | Saratoga | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 3 | 1 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 2 | 1 |
| Rated below peers | 1 | 0 |
Schools in Kincumber
- Kincumber High School Government · Secondary at peers
- Kincumber Public School Government · Primary at peers
- Holy Cross Catholic Primary School Catholic · Primary below peers
Schools in Saratoga
- Brisbania Public School Government · Primary at peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Kincumber | Saratoga | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 1 | 0 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 2 | 0 |
| Parks & reserves | 7 | 4 |
| Childcare | 6 | 1 |
| GPs | 3 | 1 |
| Pharmacies | 1 same for both | |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 2 | 0 |
| Fuel stations | 2 | 0 |
| Waterways | 7 | 0 |
Mobility
| Kincumber | Saratoga | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 51/100 | 58/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 87.7 km +2% vs other | 86.1 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 82 min | 80 min |
| Public transport score | 79/100 Bus same for both | |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 171.0 7-9am + 5-7pm | 63.8 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 0 min scheduled, not actual same for both | |
| Electric vehicle share | 1.2% postcode 2251 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 38 postcode 2251 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (61.3%).
Setting
| Kincumber | Saratoga | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 10 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 8 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 3.4 km 3.4 km to a named beach | 3.5 km |
NBN connectivity
| Kincumber | Saratoga | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 60/100 | 49/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the node same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 27% 3,768 premises | 8% 1,658 premises |
Climate
| Kincumber | Saratoga | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 1,272 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 26.4°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 10.6°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Kincumber | Saratoga | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 5.1 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 14.8 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.36 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Kincumber | Saratoga | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,409/yr same for both | |
| Council | Central Coast (NSW) same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Kincumber | Saratoga | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Robertson same for both | |
| Member | Gordon Reid same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Kincumber | Saratoga | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Kincumber
Saratoga
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Kincumber
Other comparisons with Saratoga
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.