Kikiamah vs Bimbi
Kikiamah is the younger of the two, with a median age of 36 against 49 in Bimbi. In both, the large majority of households own their home, the large majority of homes are detached houses, and most households are couple families. On these figures, Kikiamah tends to suit couples, while Bimbi suits people living alone.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Kikiamah
ahead on 2 of the 6 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (0/100 vs 74/100)
- is already more of a family suburb (79% vs 58%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Bimbi
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- leaves households under less mortgage stress (19% vs 54%)
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Bimbi
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($130/wk vs $213/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Kikiamah
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a shorter drive in (275 min vs 300 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (407.5 km vs 433.2 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
They split
one each way, out of the 4 things we measure here
- Kikiamah carries lower crime risk (0/100 vs 74/100)
- Bimbi has more residents already 65 and over (31% vs 23%)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Kikiamah
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (10.3% vs -37.7%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Kikiamah and Bimbi drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Kikiamah rents higher ($213/wk vs $130/wk); Kikiamah has more residents (107 vs 71).
| Kikiamah | Bimbi | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 107 +34% vs other | 71 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +10.3% | -37.7% |
| Median age | 36 | 49 |
| Median household income | $93,184/yr | $92,612/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $213/wk +39% vs other | $130/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (19.7%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (15.0%).
Property market
| Kikiamah | Bimbi | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | — | $130,000 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
Zoning mix
| Kikiamah | Bimbi | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 100% | 93% |
| Environmental | 0% | 7% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Kikiamah | Bimbi | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 48 across Hilltops | 6 across Weddin |
| Approvals change year on year | -47% | — |
Ranking within NSW
| Kikiamah | Bimbi | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — | Higher than 2% of NSW |
| Income | — | Higher than 59% of NSW |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 34% of NSW | Higher than 4% of NSW |
| Affordability | — | Higher than 99% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 13% of NSW | Higher than 9% of NSW |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 33% of NSW | Higher than 30% of NSW |
Liveability
| Kikiamah | Bimbi | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 6/10 | mid-range socio-economic decile 5/10 |
Risk profile
Bimbi carries more crime risk (74 vs 0).
| Kikiamah | Bimbi | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Moderate 57/100 | Moderate 60/100 |
| Crime | None 0/100 | High 74/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Kikiamah | Bimbi | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Kikiamah | Bimbi | |
|---|---|---|
| Waterways | 5 | 9 |
Mobility
Bimbi sits further from the CBD (433.2 km vs 407.5 km).
| Kikiamah | Bimbi | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 same for both | |
| Distance to Sydney | 407.5 km | 433.2 km +6% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 275 min | 300 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.2% postcode 2594 | 0.1% postcode 2810 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 45 postcode 2594 | 55 postcode 2810 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (80.5%).
Setting
| Kikiamah | Bimbi | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 322 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 272 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Kikiamah | Bimbi | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 23/100 | 21/100 |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless | Satellite (Sky Muster) |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 33 premises | 0% 19 premises |
Climate
| Kikiamah | Bimbi | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 651 mm | 553 mm |
| Summer max (Jan) | 31.0°C | 32.9°C |
| Winter min (Jul) | 1.4°C | 4.0°C |
Council rates
| Kikiamah | Bimbi | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $714/yr | $734/yr |
| Council | Hilltops | Weddin |
Federal electorate
| Kikiamah | Bimbi | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Riverina same for both | |
| Member | Michael Mccormack same for both | |
| Party | The Nationals same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Kikiamah | Bimbi | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Bimbi
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Kikiamah
Other comparisons with Bimbi
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.