Kidman Park vs Lockleys
In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Lockleys, about half of households are couple families. Houses cost more in Lockleys: a median of $1.39 million, against $1.08 million in Kidman Park. Lockleys is closer to the city centre: 7.2 km, against 9.2 km. On these figures, Kidman Park tends to suit buyers on a tighter budget.
Lockleys is closer to the CBD at 7.2 km versus Kidman Park's 9.2 km, and has a higher median household income of $97,188 compared to $85,124. Lockleys also scores better on liveability (79 versus 72) and sits in a higher socio-economic decile (9 versus 7), though median house prices are notably higher at $1,420,000 against $1,217,500. Kidman Park offers stronger walkability (77 versus 66) and a higher rental yield (3.8% versus 2.4%), which may appeal to investors or those prioritising pedestrian-friendly streets. Both suburbs share the same median age and carry no bushfire or flood risk.
Written by an AI language model from the figures below. Every number in it is checked against those figures before it is published.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Lockleys
ahead on 3 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more schools rated above their peers (1 vs 0)
- has more childcare (7 vs 4)
- carries lower crime risk (46/100 vs 58/100)
- But Kidman Park has more parks and reserves (9 vs 3)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Kidman Park
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has cheaper land ($740,000 vs $1,650,000)
- has cheaper houses ($1,080,000 vs $1,390,000)
Weighs house prices, land prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Too close to call
Nothing among the 3 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Kidman Park
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is more walkable (77/100 vs 66/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
They split
one each way, out of the 5 things we measure here
- Kidman Park is more walkable (77/100 vs 66/100)
- Lockleys carries lower crime risk (46/100 vs 58/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Kidman Park
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (14.6% vs 6.4%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Kidman Park and Lockleys drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Lockleys has more residents (5,987 vs 3,874); Lockleys has higher household incomes ($97,188 vs $85,124).
| Kidman Park | Lockleys | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,874 | 5,987 +55% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +14.6% | +6.4% |
| Median age | 44 same for both | |
| Median household income | $85,124/yr | $97,188/yr +14% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $358/wk +2% vs other | $350/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (13.3%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (5.6%).
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (17.2%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Kidman Park | Lockleys | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,080,000 | $1,390,000 |
| Median unit price | — | $540,000 |
| Median land price | $740,000 | $1,650,000 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 20 days from 28 sales | 19 days from 45 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
24 vs 40 sales
17 vs 30 sales
Zoning mix
| Kidman Park | Lockleys | |
|---|---|---|
| Residential | 86% | 73% |
| Parks and recreation | 5% | 26% |
| Commercial | 10% | 0% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Kidman Park | Lockleys | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 1,636 across Charles Sturt | 578 across West Torrens |
| Approvals change year on year | +109% | +103% |
Gross rental yield
| Kidman Park | Lockleys | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | — | 2.6% $850/wk on $1.69M |
| Units | — | 5.3% $560/wk on $549K |
Ranking within SA
| Kidman Park | Lockleys | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 60% of SA | Higher than 71% of SA |
| Income | Higher than 63% of SA | — |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 91% of SA | Higher than 86% of SA |
| Affordability | Higher than 41% of SA | — |
| EV adoption | Higher than 73% of SA | Higher than 77% of SA |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 91% of SA | Higher than 87% of SA |
| Rental yield (houses) | — | Higher than 9% of SA |
| Rental yield (units) | — | Higher than 82% of SA |
Liveability
Lockleys scores higher overall (74 vs 62); Kidman Park is more walkable (77 vs 66).
| Kidman Park | Lockleys | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | B | A |
| Score | 62/100 | 74/100 |
| Socio-economic band | advantaged area decile 7/10 | very advantaged area decile 9/10 |
Risk profile
Kidman Park carries more crime risk (58 vs 46); Kidman Park carries more flood risk (67 vs 54).
| Kidman Park | Lockleys | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Crime | Moderate 58/100 | Moderate 46/100 |
| Flood | Moderate 67/100 | Moderate 54/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 | Moderate 50/100 |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 7 within 5 km | 9 within 5 km |
Schools
| Kidman Park | Lockleys | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 2 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 | 1 |
| Rated at peers | 1 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
| Universities within 10 km | 3 Adelaide University, Adelaide City Campus, 7.0 km | 3 Adelaide University, Adelaide City Campus, 6.4 km |
| Full-time students aged 15–24 | 2.3% | 2.8% |
Schools in Kidman Park
- Kidman Park Primary School Government · Primary at peers
- Nazareth Catholic College - Kidman Park Campus Catholic · Secondary
Schools in Lockleys
- St Francis School Catholic · Primary above peers
- Lockleys North Primary School Government · Primary at peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Kidman Park | Lockleys | |
|---|---|---|
| Cafes & restaurants | 0 | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | 9 | 3 |
| Childcare | 4 | 7 |
| GPs | 1 | 0 |
| Pharmacies | 1 same for both | |
| Waterways | 1 | 0 |
Mobility
| Kidman Park | Lockleys | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 77/100 | 66/100 |
| Distance to Adelaide | 9.2 km +22% vs other | 7.2 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 16 min | 13 min |
| Public transport score | 79/100 Bus same for both | |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 65.0 7-9am + 5-7pm | 143.8 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 1 min scheduled, not actual | 0 min scheduled, not actual |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.9% postcode 5025 | 0.9% postcode 5032 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 56 postcode 5025 | 47 postcode 5032 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (75.7%).
Setting
| Kidman Park | Lockleys | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 13 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 14 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 3.2 km 3.3 km to a named beach | 3.2 km 3.4 km to a named beach |
NBN connectivity
| Kidman Park | Lockleys | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 77/100 | 75/100 |
| Most common technology | Hybrid fibre-coaxial same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 8% 1,781 premises | 6% 2,654 premises |
Climate
| Kidman Park | Lockleys | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 394 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 28.1°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 7.8°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Kidman Park | Lockleys | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 6.0 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 17.8 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 1.12 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Kidman Park | Lockleys | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,726/yr | $1,532/yr |
| Council | Charles Sturt | West Torrens |
Federal electorate
| Kidman Park | Lockleys | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Hindmarsh same for both | |
| Member | Mark Butler same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Kidman Park | Lockleys | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $15,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | — same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Kidman Park
Other comparisons with Lockleys
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.