Kent Town vs Rose Park
Kent Town is the younger of the two, with a median age of 36 against 44 in Rose Park. In Kent Town, most households rent, most homes are flats or apartments, and most households are people living alone. In Rose Park, most households own their home, most homes are detached houses, and about half of households are couple families. Houses cost more in Rose Park: a median of $2.67 million, against $2.25 million in Kent Town, and rent is higher there too. On these figures, Kent Town tends to suit renters, young adults, and people living alone, while Rose Park suits couples and older residents.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Rose Park
ahead on 3 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more separate houses rather than flats (57% vs 8%)
- carries lower crime risk (27/100 vs 92/100)
- is already more of a family suburb (55% vs 20%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Rose Park
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- leaves households under less mortgage stress (25% vs 30%)
- has cheaper units ($630,000 vs $768,000)
- But Kent Town has cheaper houses ($2,250,000 vs $2,675,000)
Weighs house prices, unit prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Kent Town
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a bigger rental market to choose from (61% vs 27%)
- has cheaper rent ($330/wk vs $365/wk)
- But Rose Park leaves renters under less rental stress (15% vs 23%)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Kent Town
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is more walkable (93/100 vs 84/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
They split
one each way, out of the 5 things we measure here
- Kent Town has more units and townhouses to downsize into (92% vs 43%)
- Rose Park carries lower crime risk (27/100 vs 92/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Kent Town
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (19.3% vs 0.1%)
Weighs house yield and population growth.
Where they sit
Kent Town and Rose Park drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Rose Park has higher household incomes ($125,372 vs $75,972); Rose Park skews older (44 vs 36).
| Kent Town | Rose Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,443 +5% vs other | 1,375 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +19.3% | +0.1% |
| Median age | 36 | 44 |
| Median household income | $75,972/yr | $125,372/yr +65% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $330/wk | $365/wk +11% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (21.2%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (28.1%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (5.6%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Kent Town | Rose Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $2,250,000 | $2,675,000 |
| Median unit price | $768,000 | $630,000 |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | — | 35 days from 9 sales |
Unit price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
8 vs 6 sales
16 vs 8 sales
Zoning mix
Kent Town has more commercially zoned land (51% vs 12%).
| Kent Town | Rose Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Residential | 30% | 83% |
| Commercial | 51% | 12% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 19% | 5% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Kent Town | Rose Park | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 227 across Norwood Payneham and St Peters | 250 across Burnside |
| Approvals change year on year | +141% | +32% |
Gross rental yield
| Kent Town | Rose Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 4.4% $665/wk on $780K | 4.2% $1,400/wk on $1.75M |
| Units | 3.9% $575/wk on $765K | — |
Ranking within SA
| Kent Town | Rose Park | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 99% of SA same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 51% of SA | Higher than 94% of SA |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 99% of SA | Higher than 95% of SA |
| Affordability | Higher than 1% of SA | Higher than 4% of SA |
| EV adoption | Higher than 95% of SA | Higher than 94% of SA |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 94% of SA | Higher than 85% of SA |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 86% of SA | Higher than 70% of SA |
| Rental yield (units) | Higher than 11% of SA | — |
Liveability
Rose Park scores higher overall (95 vs 61); Kent Town is more walkable (93 vs 84).
| Kent Town | Rose Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | B | A+ |
| Score | 61/100 | 95/100 |
| Socio-economic band | advantaged area decile 8/10 | very advantaged area decile 10/10 |
Risk profile
Kent Town carries more flood risk (82 vs 11); Kent Town carries more crime risk (92 vs 27).
| Kent Town | Rose Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Crime | High 92/100 | Low 27/100 |
| Flood | High 82/100 | Low 11/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 4 within 5 km | 6 within 5 km |
Schools
| Kent Town | Rose Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 1 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 1 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
| Universities within 10 km | 3 Adelaide University, Adelaide City Campus, 1.9 km | 3 Adelaide University, Adelaide City Campus, 2.5 km |
| Full-time students aged 15–24 | 5.1% | 4.8% |
Schools in Kent Town
- Prince Alfred College Independent · Combined above peers
Schools in Rose Park
- Rose Park Primary School Government · Primary above peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Kent Town | Rose Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 1 | 0 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 7 | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | 0 | 2 |
| Childcare | 1 | 3 |
| GPs | 1 | 0 |
| Fuel stations | 1 same for both | |
| Waterways | 1 | 0 |
Mobility
| Kent Town | Rose Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 93/100 | 84/100 |
| Distance to Adelaide | 3 km | 3.2 km +7% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 7 min same for both | |
| Public transport score | 79/100 Bus | 76/100 Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 94.5 7-9am + 5-7pm | 27.5 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 1 min scheduled, not actual same for both | |
| Electric vehicle share | 2.0% postcode 5067 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 37 postcode 5067 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (56.8%).
Setting
| Kent Town | Rose Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 50 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 63 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 11.1 km | 11.6 km |
NBN connectivity
| Kent Town | Rose Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 84/100 | 74/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the curb | Hybrid fibre-coaxial |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 33% 1,350 premises | 1% 741 premises |
Climate
| Kent Town | Rose Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 457 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 29.1°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 8.5°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Kent Town | Rose Park | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 6.0 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 17.8 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 1.12 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Kent Town | Rose Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,995/yr | $2,410/yr |
| Council | Norwood Payneham and St Peters | Burnside |
Federal electorate
| Kent Town | Rose Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Sturt same for both | |
| Member | Claire Clutterham same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Kent Town | Rose Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $15,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | — same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Rose Park
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Kent Town
Other comparisons with Rose Park
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.