Kenilworth vs Kidaman Creek
In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Kidaman Creek, about half of households are people living alone. On these figures, Kidaman Creek tends to suit people living alone.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
They split
one each way, out of the 6 things we measure here
- Kenilworth has more parks and reserves (9 vs 3)
- Kidaman Creek carries lower crime risk (27/100 vs 60/100)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Kenilworth
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- leaves households under less mortgage stress (29% vs 39%)
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Kidaman Creek
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($250/wk vs $320/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Kidaman Creek
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a shorter drive in (110 min vs 134 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (111.2 km vs 132.5 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Kidaman Creek
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- carries lower crime risk (27/100 vs 60/100)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Kenilworth
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (8.2% vs -3.8%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Kenilworth and Kidaman Creek drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Kenilworth has more residents (604 vs 125); Kenilworth rents higher ($320/wk vs $250/wk).
| Kenilworth | Kidaman Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 604 +79% vs other | 125 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +8.2% | -3.8% |
| Median age | 51 same for both | |
| Median household income | $61,724/yr +14% vs other | $53,300/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $320/wk +22% vs other | $250/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (19.2%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (3.6%).
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (21.4%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Kenilworth | Kidaman Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $880,000 | — |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | $1,300,000 | — |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 78 days from 6 sales | — |
Development activity
| Kenilworth | Kidaman Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 2,962 across Sunshine Coast same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -41% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Kenilworth | Kidaman Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 2.9% $550/wk on $980K | — |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within QLD
| Kenilworth | Kidaman Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | — | Higher than 16% of QLD |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 62% of QLD | Higher than 34% of QLD |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 65% of QLD same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 47% of QLD | Higher than 57% of QLD |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 9% of QLD | — |
Liveability
| Kenilworth | Kidaman Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | D | — |
| Score | 22/100 | — |
| Socio-economic band | below-average income decile 3/10 | mid-range socio-economic decile 5/10 |
Risk profile
Kenilworth carries more crime risk (60 vs 27); Kenilworth carries more bushfire risk (65 vs 40).
| Kenilworth | Kidaman Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Moderate 65/100 | Moderate 40/100 |
| Crime | Moderate 60/100 | Low 27/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Kenilworth | Kidaman Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 1 | 0 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 1 | 0 |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Schools in Kenilworth
- Kenilworth State Community College Government · Primary at peers
Schools in Kidaman Creek
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Amenities in the suburb
| Kenilworth | Kidaman Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 1 | 0 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 3 | 0 |
| Parks & reserves | 9 | 3 |
| Childcare | 1 | 0 |
| GPs | 1 | 0 |
| Pharmacies | 1 | 0 |
| Police stations | 1 | 0 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 1 | 0 |
| Fuel stations | 1 | 0 |
| Waterways | 25 | 2 |
Mobility
Kenilworth sits further from the CBD (132.5 km vs 111.2 km).
| Kenilworth | Kidaman Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 same for both | |
| Distance to Brisbane | 132.5 km +16% vs other | 111.2 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 134 min | 110 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.5% postcode 4574 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 76 postcode 4574 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (67.9%).
Setting
| Kenilworth | Kidaman Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 207 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 130 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 42.4 km | 30.1 km |
NBN connectivity
| Kenilworth | Kidaman Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 29/100 | 30/100 |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 353 premises | 0% 73 premises |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Kenilworth | Kidaman Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 4.3 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 12.3 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | — same for both | |
Council rates
| Kenilworth | Kidaman Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,690/yr same for both | |
| Council | Sunshine Coast same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Kenilworth | Kidaman Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Fairfax same for both | |
| Member | Ted O'Brien same for both | |
| Party | Liberal National Party of Queensland same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Kenilworth | Kidaman Creek | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $30,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Kenilworth
Other comparisons with Kidaman Creek
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.