Kemps Creek vs Erskine Park
Erskine Park is the younger of the two, with a median age of 37 against 44 in Kemps Creek. In both, most households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Kemps Creek, about half of households are couple families. In Erskine Park, most households are couple families. Houses cost more in Kemps Creek: a median of $5.25 million, against $1.21 million in Erskine Park. Erskine Park is closer to the city centre: 44.2 km, against 53 km. On these figures, Kemps Creek tends to suit older residents, while Erskine Park suits couples and buyers on a tighter budget.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Erskine Park
ahead on 4 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more parks and reserves (7 vs 2)
- has more childcare (6 vs 2)
- carries lower crime risk (46/100 vs 89/100)
- But Kemps Creek has more schools inside the suburb (7 vs 2)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Erskine Park
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper houses ($1,210,000 vs $5,250,000)
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
They split
one each way, out of the 3 things we measure here
- Kemps Creek has a bigger rental market to choose from (31% vs 20%)
- Erskine Park leaves renters under less rental stress (19% vs 27%)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Erskine Park
ahead on 3 of the 4 things we measure here
- is more walkable (50/100 vs 8/100)
- sits closer to the CBD (44.2 km vs 53 km)
- has a shorter drive in (47 min vs 52 min)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Erskine Park
ahead on 3 of the 5 things we measure here
- is more walkable (50/100 vs 8/100)
- has more GPs (2 vs 0)
- carries lower crime risk (46/100 vs 89/100)
- But Kemps Creek has more residents already 65 and over (21% vs 11%)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Erskine Park
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (0.8% vs -6.5%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Kemps Creek and Erskine Park drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Erskine Park has more residents (6,486 vs 2,121); Erskine Park has higher household incomes ($122,148 vs $91,156).
| Kemps Creek | Erskine Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,121 | 6,486 +206% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | -6.5% | +0.8% |
| Median age | 44 | 37 |
| Median household income | $91,156/yr | $122,148/yr +34% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $470/wk +4% vs other | $450/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (15.6%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (17.4%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (5.8%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Kemps Creek | Erskine Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $5,250,000 | $1,210,000 |
| Median unit price | — | $885,000 |
| Median land price | $4,500,000 | — |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 169 days from 7 sales | 26 days from 28 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
5 vs 31 sales
6 vs 37 sales
Zoning mix
Kemps Creek has more rural and farming land (48% vs 0%); Erskine Park has more industrially zoned land (48% vs 32%).
| Kemps Creek | Erskine Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Industrial | 32% | 48% |
| Rural and farming | 48% | 0% |
| Residential | 0% | 23% |
| Environmental | 14% | 17% |
| Parks and recreation | 1% | 7% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 2% | 4% |
| Other and special use | 2% | 0% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Kemps Creek | Erskine Park | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 1,063 across Penrith same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -78% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Kemps Creek | Erskine Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | — | 3.9% $850/wk on $1.14M |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within NSW
| Kemps Creek | Erskine Park | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 98% of NSW | Higher than 61% of NSW |
| Income | Higher than 59% of NSW | Higher than 85% of NSW |
| Schools | Higher than 37% of NSW | — |
| Walkability | Higher than 54% of NSW | Higher than 81% of NSW |
| Affordability | Higher than 1% of NSW | Higher than 67% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 63% of NSW | Higher than 50% of NSW |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 76% of NSW | Higher than 84% of NSW |
| Rental yield (houses) | — | Higher than 67% of NSW |
Liveability
Erskine Park is more walkable (50 vs 8); Erskine Park scores higher overall (41 vs 28).
| Kemps Creek | Erskine Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | D | C |
| Score | 28/100 | 41/100 |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 5/10 | advantaged area decile 7/10 |
Risk profile
Kemps Creek carries more crime risk (89 vs 46); Erskine Park carries more bushfire risk (82 vs 69).
| Kemps Creek | Erskine Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Moderate 69/100 | High 82/100 |
| Crime | High 89/100 | Moderate 46/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | High 83/100 | None 0/100 |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 4 within 5 km | 12 within 5 km |
Schools
| Kemps Creek | Erskine Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 7 | 2 |
| Rated above peers | 1 | 0 |
| Rated at peers | 2 | 1 |
| Rated below peers | 2 | 1 |
| Universities within 10 km | None | 1 Western Sydney University - Penrith, 8.7 km |
Schools in Kemps Creek
- Trinity Catholic Primary School Catholic · Primary above peers
- Christadelphian Heritage College Sydney Independent · Combined at peers
- Mamre Anglican School Independent · Combined at peers
- Emmaus Catholic College Catholic · Secondary below peers
- Kemps Creek Public School Government · Primary below peers
- Aspect Western Sydney School, Kemps Creek - Emmaus Independent · Secondary · Special school
Schools in Erskine Park
- James Erskine Public School Government · Primary at peers
- Erskine Park High School Government · Secondary below peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Kemps Creek | Erskine Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 0 | 2 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 3 | 0 |
| Parks & reserves | 2 | 7 |
| Childcare | 2 | 6 |
| GPs | 0 | 2 |
| Pharmacies | 0 | 1 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 1 | 0 |
| Fuel stations | 4 | 1 |
| Waterways | 4 | 2 |
Mobility
Kemps Creek sits further from the CBD (53 km vs 44.2 km).
| Kemps Creek | Erskine Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 8/100 | 50/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 53 km +17% vs other | 44.2 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 52 min | 47 min |
| Public transport score | 71/100 Bus | 79/100 Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 38.0 7-9am + 5-7pm | 143.0 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 1 min scheduled, not actual | 0 min scheduled, not actual |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.6% postcode 2178 | 0.5% postcode 2759 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 54 postcode 2178 | 55 postcode 2759 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (61.6%).
Setting
| Kemps Creek | Erskine Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 45 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 63 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 35.1 km | 37.0 km |
NBN connectivity
| Kemps Creek | Erskine Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 69/100 | 75/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the node | Hybrid fibre-coaxial |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 38% 817 premises | 3% 2,236 premises |
Climate
| Kemps Creek | Erskine Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 822 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | — same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | — same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Kemps Creek | Erskine Park | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 6.7 µg/m³ | 5.6 µg/m³ |
| PM10 | 16.9 µg/m³ | 17.6 µg/m³ |
| NO₂ | 0.37 pphm | 0.55 pphm |
Council rates
| Kemps Creek | Erskine Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,547/yr same for both | |
| Council | Penrith same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Kemps Creek | Erskine Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Mcmahon same for both | |
| Member | Chris Bowen same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Kemps Creek | Erskine Park | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Kemps Creek
Erskine Park
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Kemps Creek
Other comparisons with Erskine Park
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.