Kelmscott vs Mount Nasura
Kelmscott is the younger of the two, with a median age of 40 against 44 in Mount Nasura. In both, most households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Mount Nasura, about half of households are couple families. Houses cost more in Mount Nasura: a median of $810,000, against $725,000 in Kelmscott, and rent is higher there too. On these figures, Kelmscott tends to suit people living alone, while Mount Nasura suits couples.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
They split
one each way, out of the 6 things we measure here
- Kelmscott has more childcare (9 vs 1)
- Mount Nasura carries lower crime risk (61/100 vs 86/100)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
They split
one each way, out of the 3 things we measure here
- Kelmscott has cheaper houses ($725,000 vs $810,000)
- Mount Nasura has cheaper land ($357,500 vs $580,000)
Weighs house prices, land prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Kelmscott
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a bigger rental market to choose from (28% vs 12%)
- has cheaper rent ($290/wk vs $345/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Kelmscott
ahead on 2 of the 4 things we measure here
- is more walkable (79/100 vs 59/100)
- sits closer to the CBD (29.1 km vs 31.7 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Kelmscott
ahead on 3 of the 5 things we measure here
- has more units and townhouses to downsize into (18% vs 3%)
- has more GPs (5 vs 1)
- is more walkable (79/100 vs 59/100)
- But Mount Nasura carries lower crime risk (61/100 vs 86/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Too close to call
Nothing among the 2 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs house yield and population growth.
Where they sit
Kelmscott and Mount Nasura drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Kelmscott has more residents (10,575 vs 2,997); Mount Nasura has higher household incomes ($91,104 vs $70,460).
| Kelmscott | Mount Nasura | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 10,575 +72% vs other | 2,997 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +1.1% | +0.5% |
| Median age | 40 | 44 |
| Median household income | $70,460/yr | $91,104/yr +29% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $290/wk | $345/wk +19% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (15.4%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (19.0%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (14.4%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Kelmscott | Mount Nasura | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $725,000 | $810,000 |
| Median unit price | $597,500 | — |
| Median land price | $580,000 | $357,500 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 26 days from 169 sales | 24 days from 48 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
187 vs 56 sales
99 vs 45 sales
9 vs 12 sales
Development activity
| Kelmscott | Mount Nasura | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 1,811 across Armadale same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +70% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Kelmscott | Mount Nasura | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 4.5% $650/wk on $749K | 4.1% $675/wk on $849K |
| Units | 5.5% $638/wk on $600K | — |
Ranking within WA
| Kelmscott | Mount Nasura | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 29% of WA | Higher than 55% of WA |
| Schools | Higher than 77% of WA | — |
| Walkability | Higher than 94% of WA | Higher than 86% of WA |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 73% of WA | Higher than 84% of WA |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 78% of WA | Higher than 82% of WA |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 59% of WA | Higher than 33% of WA |
| Rental yield (units) | Higher than 53% of WA | — |
Liveability
Kelmscott is more walkable (79 vs 59); Mount Nasura scores higher overall (52 vs 44).
| Kelmscott | Mount Nasura | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | C | B |
| Score | 44/100 | 52/100 |
| Socio-economic band | below-average income decile 2/10 | mid-range socio-economic decile 6/10 |
Risk profile
Kelmscott carries more flood risk (42 vs 0); Kelmscott carries more crime risk (86 vs 61).
| Kelmscott | Mount Nasura | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Moderate 56/100 | Moderate 54/100 |
| Crime | High 86/100 | Moderate 61/100 |
| Flood | Moderate 42/100 | None 0/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 2 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Kelmscott | Mount Nasura | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 5 | 0 |
| Rated above peers | 2 | 0 |
| Rated at peers | 1 | 0 |
| Rated below peers | 2 | 0 |
Schools in Kelmscott
- Kelmscott Primary School Government · Primary above peers
- Kelmscott Senior High School Government · Secondary above peers
- Clifton Hills Primary School Government · Primary at peers
- Good Shepherd Catholic Primary School Catholic · Primary below peers
- Sowilo Community High School Independent · Secondary · Special school below peers
Schools in Mount Nasura
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Amenities in the suburb
| Kelmscott | Mount Nasura | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 4 | 0 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 6 | 0 |
| Parks & reserves | 16 | 4 |
| Childcare | 9 | 1 |
| GPs | 5 | 1 |
| Pharmacies | 1 same for both | |
| Hospitals | 0 | 1 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 1 | 0 |
| Fuel stations | 4 | 0 |
| Waterways | 3 | 0 |
Mobility
Mount Nasura sits further from the CBD (31.7 km vs 29.1 km).
| Kelmscott | Mount Nasura | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 79/100 | 59/100 |
| Distance to Perth | 29.1 km | 31.7 km +9% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 35 min | 36 min |
| Public transport score | 94/100 Rail · Bus | 69/100 Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 194.2 7-9am + 5-7pm | 22.5 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 0 min scheduled, not actual | 1 min scheduled, not actual |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.8% postcode 6111 | 1.2% postcode 6112 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 62 postcode 6111 | 75 postcode 6112 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (81.0%).
Setting
| Kelmscott | Mount Nasura | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 48 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 125 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 24.6 km 3.1 km to a named beach | 24.0 km 4.1 km to a named beach |
NBN connectivity
| Kelmscott | Mount Nasura | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 65/100 | 69/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the node same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 36% 5,609 premises | 44% 1,303 premises |
Climate
| Kelmscott | Mount Nasura | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 745 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 31.4°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 7.6°C same for both | |
Council rates
| Kelmscott | Mount Nasura | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $2,388/yr same for both | |
| Council | Armadale same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Kelmscott | Mount Nasura | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Bullwinkel same for both | |
| Member | Trish Cook same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Kelmscott | Mount Nasura | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $800,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Kelmscott
Mount Nasura
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Kelmscott
Other comparisons with Mount Nasura
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.