Keiraville vs Mount Pleasant
Keiraville is the younger of the two, with a median age of 26 against 40 in Mount Pleasant. In both, most households own their home and most homes are detached houses. In Mount Pleasant, most households are couple families. On these figures, Keiraville tends to suit young adults, people living alone, and share households, while Mount Pleasant suits families with children and couples.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Mount Pleasant
ahead on 3 of the 6 things we measure here
- carries lower crime risk (20/100 vs 57/100)
- is already more of a family suburb (73% vs 45%)
- has more separate houses rather than flats (98% vs 63%)
- But Keiraville has more parks and reserves (14 vs 1)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Mount Pleasant
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- leaves households under less mortgage stress (21% vs 29%)
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
Keiraville
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a bigger rental market to choose from (40% vs 6%)
- has cheaper rent ($420/wk vs $550/wk)
- But Mount Pleasant leaves renters under less rental stress (19% vs 24%)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Keiraville
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is more walkable (75/100 vs 53/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Keiraville
ahead on 2 of the 5 things we measure here
- has more units and townhouses to downsize into (37% vs 2%)
- is more walkable (75/100 vs 53/100)
- But Mount Pleasant carries lower crime risk (20/100 vs 57/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Keiraville
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (12.1% vs 2.0%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Keiraville and Mount Pleasant drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Keiraville has more residents (4,001 vs 1,397); Mount Pleasant has higher household incomes ($148,824 vs $90,428).
| Keiraville | Mount Pleasant | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 4,001 +65% vs other | 1,397 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +12.1% | +2.0% |
| Median age | 26 | 40 |
| Median household income | $90,428/yr | $148,824/yr +65% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $420/wk | $550/wk +31% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (18.9%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (19.8%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (4.0%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Keiraville | Mount Pleasant | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,332,500 | $1,440,000 |
| Median unit price | $882,500 | — |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 39 days from 7 sales | 24 days from 8 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
27 vs 10 sales
18 vs 18 sales
8 vs 7 sales
Zoning mix
| Keiraville | Mount Pleasant | |
|---|---|---|
| Residential | 42% | 72% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 31% | 15% |
| Parks and recreation | 15% | 4% |
| Environmental | 12% | 9% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Keiraville | Mount Pleasant | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 1,476 across Wollongong same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -31% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Keiraville | Mount Pleasant | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 2.7% $600/wk on $1.15M | — |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within NSW
| Keiraville | Mount Pleasant | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 64% of NSW | Higher than 74% of NSW |
| Income | Higher than 58% of NSW | Higher than 94% of NSW |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 90% of NSW | Higher than 82% of NSW |
| Affordability | Higher than 41% of NSW | Higher than 64% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 86% of NSW same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 76% of NSW | Higher than 90% of NSW |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 11% of NSW | — |
Liveability
Keiraville is more walkable (75 vs 53); Keiraville scores higher overall (69 vs 58).
| Keiraville | Mount Pleasant | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | B same for both | |
| Score | 69/100 | 58/100 |
| Socio-economic band | very advantaged area decile 9/10 | very advantaged area decile 10/10 |
Risk profile
Mount Pleasant carries more bushfire risk (85 vs 0); Keiraville carries more crime risk (57 vs 20).
| Keiraville | Mount Pleasant | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 | High 85/100 |
| Crime | Moderate 57/100 | Low 20/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 4 within 5 km | 1 within 5 km |
Schools
| Keiraville | Mount Pleasant | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 2 | 1 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 1 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
| Universities within 10 km | 1 UOW Wollongong, 2.8 km | 1 UOW Wollongong, 4.2 km |
| Full-time students aged 15–24 | 19.8% | 2.6% |
Schools in Keiraville
- Keiraville Public School Government · Primary at peers
- Aspect South Coast School, Wollongong University Independent · Combined · Special school
Schools in Mount Pleasant
- Pleasant Heights Public School Government · Primary at peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Keiraville | Mount Pleasant | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 1 | 0 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 3 | 0 |
| Parks & reserves | 14 | 1 |
| Childcare | 4 | 1 |
| Pharmacies | 2 | 0 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 2 | 0 |
| Waterways | 2 | 0 |
Mobility
| Keiraville | Mount Pleasant | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 75/100 | 53/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 83.2 km | 82.8 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 79 min | 77 min |
| Public transport score | 77/100 Bus | 39/100 Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 83.0 7-9am + 5-7pm | 13.2 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 0 min scheduled, not actual | 1 min scheduled, not actual |
| Electric vehicle share | 1.3% postcode 2500 | 1.3% postcode 2519 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 14 postcode 2500 | 30 postcode 2519 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (54.7%).
Setting
| Keiraville | Mount Pleasant | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 48 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 136 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 2.7 km 2.7 km to a named beach | 3.3 km 3.5 km to a named beach |
NBN connectivity
| Keiraville | Mount Pleasant | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 69/100 | 81/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the node | Fibre to the premises |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 44% 1,470 premises | 66% 524 premises |
Climate
| Keiraville | Mount Pleasant | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 974 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | — same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | — same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Keiraville | Mount Pleasant | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 6.2 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 18.2 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.66 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Keiraville | Mount Pleasant | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,751/yr same for both | |
| Council | Wollongong same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Keiraville | Mount Pleasant | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Cunningham same for both | |
| Member | Alison Byrnes same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Keiraville | Mount Pleasant | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Keiraville
Mount Pleasant
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Keiraville
Other comparisons with Mount Pleasant
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.