Keilor Park vs Tullamarine
Tullamarine is the younger of the two, with a median age of 39 against 44 in Keilor Park. In both, most households own their home and most homes are detached houses. In Keilor Park, about half of households are couple families. Houses cost more in Keilor Park: a median of $920,000, against $795,000 in Tullamarine, and rent is higher there too. On these figures, Keilor Park tends to suit couples, while Tullamarine suits people living alone.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Keilor Park
ahead on 3 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more separate houses rather than flats (89% vs 59%)
- is already more of a family suburb (65% vs 50%)
- carries lower crime risk (75/100 vs 88/100)
- But Tullamarine has more childcare (5 vs 1)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Tullamarine
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has cheaper units ($540,000 vs $655,000)
- has cheaper houses ($795,000 vs $920,000)
Weighs house prices, unit prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Tullamarine
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a bigger rental market to choose from (35% vs 17%)
- has cheaper rent ($355/wk vs $392/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Tullamarine
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is more walkable (61/100 vs 47/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Tullamarine
ahead on 3 of the 5 things we measure here
- has more GPs (4 vs 0)
- has more units and townhouses to downsize into (41% vs 12%)
- is more walkable (61/100 vs 47/100)
- But Keilor Park has more residents already 65 and over (26% vs 20%)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Keilor Park
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- returns a higher gross yield on houses (4.6% vs 4.1%)
Weighs house yield and population growth.
Where they sit
Keilor Park and Tullamarine drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Tullamarine has more residents (6,733 vs 2,684); Keilor Park skews older (44 vs 39).
| Keilor Park | Tullamarine | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,684 | 6,733 +151% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | -1.3% | +1.9% |
| Median age | 44 | 39 |
| Median household income | $76,336/yr +4% vs other | $73,008/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $392/wk +9% vs other | $355/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (17.9%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (14.4%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (11.0%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Keilor Park | Tullamarine | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $920,000 | $795,000 |
| Median unit price | $655,000 | $540,000 |
| Median land price | $915,000 | — |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 28 days from 12 sales | 24 days from 66 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
35 vs 86 sales
36 vs 21 sales
Zoning mix
Tullamarine has more industrially zoned land (32% vs 15%); Tullamarine has more commercially zoned land (23% vs 8%).
| Keilor Park | Tullamarine | |
|---|---|---|
| Industrial | 15% | 32% |
| Residential | 27% | 25% |
| Commercial | 8% | 23% |
| Parks and recreation | 19% | 3% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 19% | 16% |
| Environmental | 13% | 0% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Keilor Park | Tullamarine | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 670 across Brimbank | 3,063 across Hume |
| Approvals change year on year | +40% | +0% |
Gross rental yield
| Keilor Park | Tullamarine | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 4.6% $750/wk on $852K | 4.1% $585/wk on $750K |
| Units | — | 4.5% $500/wk on $584K |
Ranking within VIC
| Keilor Park | Tullamarine | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 59% of VIC | Higher than 54% of VIC |
| Income | Higher than 43% of VIC | Higher than 38% of VIC |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 85% of VIC | Higher than 88% of VIC |
| Affordability | Higher than 30% of VIC | Higher than 31% of VIC |
| EV adoption | Higher than 75% of VIC | Higher than 84% of VIC |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 99% of VIC | Higher than 100% of VIC |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 92% of VIC | Higher than 71% of VIC |
| Rental yield (units) | — | Higher than 29% of VIC |
Liveability
Tullamarine is more walkable (61 vs 47).
| Keilor Park | Tullamarine | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | C same for both | |
| Score | 42/100 | 45/100 |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 5/10 | mid-range socio-economic decile 4/10 |
Risk profile
Keilor Park carries more flood risk (49 vs 20); Tullamarine carries more crime risk (88 vs 75).
| Keilor Park | Tullamarine | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Low 39/100 | Low 34/100 |
| Crime | High 75/100 | High 88/100 |
| Flood | Moderate 49/100 | Low 20/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | High 70/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 5 within 5 km | 8 within 5 km |
Schools
| Keilor Park | Tullamarine | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 | 1 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 | 1 |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
| Universities within 10 km | 1 Victoria University Footscray Park, 9.6 km | None |
Schools in Keilor Park
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Schools in Tullamarine
- Tullamarine Primary School Government · Primary at peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Keilor Park | Tullamarine | |
|---|---|---|
| Cafes & restaurants | 2 | 9 |
| Parks & reserves | 5 | 14 |
| Childcare | 1 | 5 |
| GPs | 0 | 4 |
| Pharmacies | 1 same for both | |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 1 same for both | |
| Fuel stations | 3 same for both | |
| Waterways | 6 | 7 |
Mobility
| Keilor Park | Tullamarine | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 47/100 | 61/100 |
| Distance to Melbourne | 17.9 km +1% vs other | 17.7 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 25 min | 24 min |
| Public transport score | 77/100 Bus | 79/100 Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 103.5 7-9am + 5-7pm | 160.2 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 0 min scheduled, not actual same for both | |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.9% postcode 3042 | 1.3% postcode 3043 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 21 postcode 3042 | 27 postcode 3043 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (68.6%).
Setting
| Keilor Park | Tullamarine | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 74 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 85 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 14.6 km | 15.5 km |
NBN connectivity
| Keilor Park | Tullamarine | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 100/100 same for both | |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the premises same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 100% 1,609 premises | 99% 5,165 premises |
Climate
| Keilor Park | Tullamarine | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 534 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 26.7°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 6.5°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Keilor Park | Tullamarine | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | — same for both | |
| PM10 | 18.9 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | — same for both | |
Council rates
| Keilor Park | Tullamarine | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,847/yr | $1,715/yr |
| Council | Brimbank | Hume |
Federal electorate
| Keilor Park | Tullamarine | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Hawke | Maribyrnong |
| Member | Sam Rae | Jo Briskey |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Keilor Park | Tullamarine | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Keilor Park
Tullamarine
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Keilor Park
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.