Katoomba vs Megalong Valley
Katoomba is the younger of the two, with a median age of 48 against 52 in Megalong Valley. In both, most households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Katoomba, about half of households are people living alone. In Megalong Valley, most households are couple families. Houses cost more in Megalong Valley: a median of $1.3 million, against $900,000 in Katoomba, though rent is higher in Katoomba. On these figures, Katoomba tends to suit people living alone and buyers on a tighter budget, while Megalong Valley suits couples.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
They split
one each way, out of the 6 things we measure here
- Katoomba has more childcare (7 vs 0)
- Megalong Valley is already more of a family suburb (80% vs 40%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
They split
one each way, out of the 2 things we measure here
- Katoomba has cheaper houses ($900,000 vs $1,300,000)
- Megalong Valley leaves households under less mortgage stress (25% vs 32%)
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
Megalong Valley
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- leaves renters under less rental stress (14% vs 30%)
- has cheaper rent ($280/wk vs $350/wk)
- But Katoomba has a bigger rental market to choose from (34% vs 12%)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Katoomba
ahead on 3 of the 3 things we measure here
- is more walkable (42/100 vs 0/100)
- has a shorter drive in (89 min vs 137 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (102.9 km vs 132.1 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Katoomba
ahead on 2 of the 4 things we measure here
- is more walkable (42/100 vs 0/100)
- has more GPs (4 vs 0)
- But Megalong Valley carries lower crime risk (53/100 vs 82/100)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Katoomba and Megalong Valley drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Katoomba has more residents (8,268 vs 148); Megalong Valley has higher household incomes ($106,184 vs $60,892).
| Katoomba | Megalong Valley | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 8,268 +98% vs other | 148 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +3.8% | -0.7% |
| Median age | 48 | 52 |
| Median household income | $60,892/yr | $106,184/yr +74% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $350/wk +20% vs other | $280/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (24.3%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (5.6%).
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (18.9%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Katoomba | Megalong Valley | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $900,000 | $1,300,000 |
| Median unit price | $600,000 | — |
| Median land price | $375,000 | — |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 34 days from 142 sales | — |
Zoning mix
Megalong Valley has more rural and farming land (84% vs 0%); Katoomba has more land zoned for conservation (73% vs 15%).
| Katoomba | Megalong Valley | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 0% | 84% |
| Environmental | 73% | 15% |
| Residential | 11% | 0% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 7% | 0% |
| Parks and recreation | 4% | 1% |
| Industrial | 3% | 0% |
| Other and special use | 1% | 0% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Katoomba | Megalong Valley | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 123 across Blue Mountains same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +14% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Katoomba | Megalong Valley | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 3.5% $650/wk on $978K | — |
| Units | 4.7% $500/wk on $549K | — |
Ranking within NSW
| Katoomba | Megalong Valley | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 40% of NSW | Higher than 67% of NSW |
| Income | Higher than 23% of NSW | Higher than 72% of NSW |
| Schools | Higher than 85% of NSW | — |
| Walkability | Higher than 79% of NSW | Higher than 25% of NSW |
| Affordability | Higher than 38% of NSW | Higher than 49% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 91% of NSW | Higher than 90% of NSW |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 72% of NSW | Higher than 27% of NSW |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 42% of NSW | — |
| Rental yield (units) | Higher than 54% of NSW | — |
Liveability
Katoomba is more walkable (42 vs 0).
| Katoomba | Megalong Valley | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | C | — |
| Score | 42/100 | — |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 4/10 | very advantaged area decile 10/10 |
Risk profile
Katoomba carries more crime risk (82 vs 53).
| Katoomba | Megalong Valley | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | High 80/100 | High 89/100 |
| Crime | High 82/100 | Moderate 53/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 2 within 5 km | 0 within 5 km |
Schools
| Katoomba | Megalong Valley | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 4 | 1 |
| Rated above peers | 2 | 0 |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 2 | 0 |
Schools in Katoomba
- Katoomba North Public School Government · Primary above peers
- St Canice's Primary School Catholic · Primary above peers
- Katoomba High School Government · Secondary below peers
- Katoomba Public School Government · Primary below peers
Schools in Megalong Valley
- Megalong Public School Government · Primary
Amenities in the suburb
| Katoomba | Megalong Valley | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 5 | 0 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 54 | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | 29 | 7 |
| Childcare | 7 | 0 |
| GPs | 4 | 0 |
| Pharmacies | 1 | 0 |
| Hospitals | 1 | 0 |
| Police stations | 1 | 0 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 4 | 0 |
| Fuel stations | 2 | 0 |
| EV chargers | 1 | 0 |
| Waterways | 28 | 26 |
Mobility
Megalong Valley sits further from the CBD (132.1 km vs 102.9 km).
| Katoomba | Megalong Valley | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 42/100 | 0/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 102.9 km | 132.1 km +28% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 89 min | 137 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 1.6% postcode 2780 | 1.5% postcode 2785 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 32 postcode 2780 | 39 postcode 2785 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (50.9%).
Setting
| Katoomba | Megalong Valley | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 1,033 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 774 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Katoomba | Megalong Valley | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 63/100 | 18/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the node | Satellite (Sky Muster) |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 32% 5,542 premises | 0% 57 premises |
Climate
| Katoomba | Megalong Valley | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 1,496 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 23.6°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 3.7°C same for both | |
Council rates
| Katoomba | Megalong Valley | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $2,080/yr same for both | |
| Council | Blue Mountains same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Katoomba | Megalong Valley | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Macquarie same for both | |
| Member | Susan Templeman same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Katoomba | Megalong Valley | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Katoomba
Megalong Valley
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Katoomba
Other comparisons with Megalong Valley
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.