Kangaroo Flat vs Ward Belt
In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Ward Belt, most households are couple families. Ward Belt is closer to the city centre: 49.1 km, against 58 km. On these figures, Ward Belt tends to suit couples.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Ward Belt
ahead on 3 of the 6 things we measure here
- is already more of a family suburb (91% vs 78%)
- has more separate houses rather than flats (100% vs 86%)
- carries lower crime risk (78/100 vs 89/100)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Kangaroo Flat
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- leaves households under less mortgage stress (11% vs 26%)
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Kangaroo Flat
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- leaves renters under less rental stress (15% vs 27%)
- has cheaper rent ($340/wk vs $425/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Ward Belt
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- sits closer to the CBD (49.1 km vs 58 km)
- has a shorter drive in (40 min vs 45 min)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Ward Belt
ahead on 2 of the 4 things we measure here
- has more residents already 65 and over (20% vs 15%)
- carries lower crime risk (78/100 vs 89/100)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Kangaroo Flat and Ward Belt drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Ward Belt has more residents (158 vs 104); Kangaroo Flat has higher household incomes ($117,000 vs $82,316).
| Kangaroo Flat | Ward Belt | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 104 | 158 +52% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | -1.9% | +2.6% |
| Median age | 46 | 45 |
| Median household income | $117,000/yr +30% vs other | $82,316/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $340/wk | $425/wk +25% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (20.2%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (7.7%).
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (25.0%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Zoning mix
| Kangaroo Flat | Ward Belt | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 100% | 97% |
| Parks and recreation | 0% | 3% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Kangaroo Flat | Ward Belt | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 278 across Light same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +43% same for both | |
Ranking within SA
| Kangaroo Flat | Ward Belt | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 91% of SA | Higher than 58% of SA |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 49% of SA | Higher than 21% of SA |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 57% of SA same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 67% of SA | Higher than 71% of SA |
Liveability
| Kangaroo Flat | Ward Belt | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 6/10 | below-average income decile 3/10 |
Risk profile
Ward Belt carries more flood risk (31 vs 18); Kangaroo Flat carries more crime risk (89 vs 78).
| Kangaroo Flat | Ward Belt | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Low 23/100 | Low 15/100 |
| Crime | High 89/100 | High 78/100 |
| Flood | Low 18/100 | Low 31/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 2 within 5 km | 1 within 5 km |
Schools
| Kangaroo Flat | Ward Belt | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Mobility
Kangaroo Flat sits further from the CBD (58 km vs 49.1 km).
| Kangaroo Flat | Ward Belt | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 same for both | |
| Distance to Adelaide | 58 km +15% vs other | 49.1 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 45 min | 40 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.6% postcode 5118 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 76 postcode 5118 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (75.4%).
Setting
| Kangaroo Flat | Ward Belt | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 56 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 43 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 25.6 km | 21.6 km |
NBN connectivity
| Kangaroo Flat | Ward Belt | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 30/100 | 37/100 |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 37 premises | 8% 66 premises |
Climate
| Kangaroo Flat | Ward Belt | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 404 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 30.0°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 6.6°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Kangaroo Flat | Ward Belt | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 5.5 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 18.7 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.31 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Kangaroo Flat | Ward Belt | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $2,297/yr same for both | |
| Council | Light same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Kangaroo Flat | Ward Belt | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Grey same for both | |
| Member | Tom Venning same for both | |
| Party | Liberal same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Kangaroo Flat | Ward Belt | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $15,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | — same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Kangaroo Flat
Other comparisons with Ward Belt
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.