Kancoona vs Rosewhite
Rosewhite is the younger of the two, with a median age of 50 against 61 in Kancoona. In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Kancoona, most households are couple families. In Rosewhite, about half of households are people living alone. On these figures, Kancoona tends to suit couples and older residents.
Kancoona and Rosewhite are both small, quiet rural communities in Victoria with identical household incomes around $68,224 per year. Kancoona is notably older with a median age of 61 compared to Rosewhite's 50, and has lower weekly rent at $200 versus $250. Rosewhite is slightly closer to the CBD at 311.1 km, while Kancoona sits 331.9 km away. Both face elevated bushfire risk and share the same low crime rates, though Kancoona has considerably lower flood risk at 11 compared to Rosewhite's 26.
Written by an AI language model from the figures below. Every number in it is checked against those figures before it is published.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Too close to call
Nothing among the 6 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Kancoona
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- leaves households under less mortgage stress (10% vs 24%)
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Kancoona
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper rent ($200/wk vs $250/wk)
Weighs rent and rental stress.
Commuting to the city
Rosewhite
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a shorter drive in (208 min vs 233 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (311.1 km vs 331.9 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Kancoona
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has more residents already 65 and over (38% vs 25%)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Rosewhite
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (5.2% vs -11.9%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Kancoona and Rosewhite drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Rosewhite has more residents (141 vs 74); Rosewhite rents higher ($250/wk vs $200/wk).
| Kancoona | Rosewhite | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 74 | 141 +91% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | -11.9% | +5.2% |
| Median age | 61 | 50 |
| Median household income | $68,224/yr same for both | |
| Median weekly rent | $200/wk | $250/wk +25% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (37.8%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (4.1%).
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (21.6%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Zoning mix
Rosewhite has more rural and farming land (64% vs 25%).
| Kancoona | Rosewhite | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks and recreation | 75% | 36% |
| Rural and farming | 25% | 64% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Kancoona | Rosewhite | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 32 across Alpine same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -42% same for both | |
Ranking within VIC
| Kancoona | Rosewhite | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 29% of VIC same for both | |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 12% of VIC | Higher than 15% of VIC |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 53% of VIC | Higher than 24% of VIC |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 12% of VIC | Higher than 17% of VIC |
Liveability
| Kancoona | Rosewhite | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — same for both | |
| Score | — same for both | |
| Socio-economic band | advantaged area decile 7/10 same for both | |
Risk profile
Rosewhite carries more flood risk (27 vs 11).
| Kancoona | Rosewhite | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | High 95/100 | High 96/100 |
| Crime | Low 20/100 | Low 17/100 |
| Flood | Low 11/100 | Low 27/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Kancoona | Rosewhite | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Kancoona | Rosewhite | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 0 | 1 |
| Waterways | 3 same for both | |
Mobility
Kancoona sits further from the CBD (331.9 km vs 311.1 km).
| Kancoona | Rosewhite | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 same for both | |
| Distance to Melbourne | 331.9 km +6% vs other | 311.1 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 233 min | 208 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.5% postcode 3691 | 0.3% postcode 3737 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 79 postcode 3691 | 50 postcode 3737 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (63.0%).
Setting
| Kancoona | Rosewhite | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 474 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 389 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Kancoona | Rosewhite | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 16/100 | 20/100 |
| Most common technology | Satellite (Sky Muster) same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 34 premises | 0% 44 premises |
Climate
| Kancoona | Rosewhite | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 895 mm | 1,451 mm |
| Summer max (Jan) | — same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | — same for both | |
Council rates
| Kancoona | Rosewhite | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,945/yr same for both | |
| Council | Alpine same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Kancoona | Rosewhite | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Indi same for both | |
| Member | Helen Haines same for both | |
| Party | Independent same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Kancoona | Rosewhite | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Kancoona
Other comparisons with Rosewhite
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.