Kalorama vs Mount Dandenong
In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Kalorama, most households are couple families. In Mount Dandenong, about half of households are couple families. Houses cost more in Mount Dandenong: a median of $1.01 million, against $900,000 in Kalorama.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Too close to call
Nothing among the 6 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Kalorama
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper houses ($900,000 vs $1,007,500)
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
Too close to call
Nothing among the 3 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
They split
one each way, out of the 4 things we measure here
- Kalorama sits closer to the CBD (43.5 km vs 47.4 km)
- Mount Dandenong is more walkable (40/100 vs 26/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Mount Dandenong
ahead on 2 of the 5 things we measure here
- is more walkable (40/100 vs 26/100)
- has more residents already 65 and over (22% vs 16%)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Kalorama and Mount Dandenong drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Mount Dandenong skews older (45 vs 43).
| Kalorama | Mount Dandenong | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,277 | 1,271 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +3.1% | +1.6% |
| Median age | 43 | 45 |
| Median household income | $108,524/yr +2% vs other | $106,860/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $416/wk | $415/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (18.3%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (18.7%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (7.6%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Kalorama | Mount Dandenong | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $900,000 | $1,007,500 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | $292,500 | — |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 11 days from 7 sales | 50 days from 9 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
20 vs 18 sales
20 vs 21 sales
Zoning mix
Kalorama has more land zoned for conservation (10% vs 0%).
| Kalorama | Mount Dandenong | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks and recreation | 52% | 64% |
| Rural and farming | 31% | 33% |
| Environmental | 10% | 0% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 7% | 2% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Kalorama | Mount Dandenong | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 416 across Yarra Ranges same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -57% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Kalorama | Mount Dandenong | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 5.1% $870/wk on $892K | — |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within VIC
| Kalorama | Mount Dandenong | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 64% of VIC | Higher than 77% of VIC |
| Income | Higher than 81% of VIC | Higher than 79% of VIC |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 82% of VIC | Higher than 85% of VIC |
| Affordability | Higher than 61% of VIC | Higher than 31% of VIC |
| EV adoption | Higher than 80% of VIC | Higher than 91% of VIC |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 97% of VIC same for both | |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 98% of VIC | — |
Liveability
Mount Dandenong is more walkable (40 vs 26).
| Kalorama | Mount Dandenong | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | B same for both | |
| Score | 64/100 | 67/100 |
| Socio-economic band | very advantaged area decile 9/10 | very advantaged area decile 10/10 |
Risk profile
| Kalorama | Mount Dandenong | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | High 78/100 | High 77/100 |
| Crime | Moderate 40/100 | Low 36/100 |
| Flood | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 1 within 5 km | 8 within 5 km |
Schools
| Kalorama | Mount Dandenong | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 | 1 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 | 1 |
Schools in Kalorama
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Schools in Mount Dandenong
- Mount Dandenong Primary School Government · Primary below peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Kalorama | Mount Dandenong | |
|---|---|---|
| Cafes & restaurants | 1 | 2 |
| Parks & reserves | 3 | 4 |
| Childcare | 0 | 2 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 1 | 0 |
| Waterways | 5 | 3 |
Mobility
Mount Dandenong sits further from the CBD (47.4 km vs 43.5 km).
| Kalorama | Mount Dandenong | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 26/100 | 40/100 |
| Distance to Melbourne | 43.5 km | 47.4 km +9% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 51 min | 55 min |
| Public transport score | 78/100 Bus | 77/100 Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 45.0 7-9am + 5-7pm | 40.2 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 1 min scheduled, not actual | 0 min scheduled, not actual |
| Electric vehicle share | 1.1% postcode 3766 | 1.6% postcode 3767 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 26 postcode 3766 | 19 postcode 3767 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (59.4%).
Setting
| Kalorama | Mount Dandenong | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 367 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 586 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 33.7 km | 30.2 km |
NBN connectivity
| Kalorama | Mount Dandenong | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 93/100 | 94/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the premises same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 68% 612 premises | 70% 583 premises |
Climate
| Kalorama | Mount Dandenong | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 777 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 26.9°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 6.3°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Kalorama | Mount Dandenong | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | — same for both | |
| PM10 | 15.5 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | — same for both | |
Council rates
| Kalorama | Mount Dandenong | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $2,161/yr same for both | |
| Council | Yarra Ranges same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Kalorama | Mount Dandenong | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Casey same for both | |
| Member | Aaron Violi same for both | |
| Party | Liberal same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Kalorama | Mount Dandenong | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Kalorama
Other comparisons with Mount Dandenong
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.