Kalinga vs Wooloowin
Wooloowin is the younger of the two, with a median age of 35 against 39 in Kalinga. In Kalinga, the large majority of households own their home, the large majority of homes are detached houses, and most households are couple families. In Wooloowin, about half of households rent, about half of homes are flats or apartments, and about half of households are people living alone. Houses cost more in Kalinga: a median of $2.12 million, against $1.71 million in Wooloowin, and rent is higher there too. Wooloowin is closer to the city centre: 6.9 km, against 8.1 km. On these figures, Kalinga tends to suit families with children and couples, while Wooloowin suits renters, young adults, and people living alone.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Kalinga
ahead on 4 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more parks and reserves (7 vs 1)
- has more separate houses rather than flats (89% vs 46%)
- carries lower crime risk (32/100 vs 57/100)
- But Wooloowin has more childcare (5 vs 1)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Kalinga
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- leaves households under less mortgage stress (19% vs 25%)
- has cheaper units ($610,000 vs $747,000)
- But Wooloowin has cheaper houses ($1,705,000 vs $2,115,000)
Weighs house prices, unit prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Wooloowin
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a bigger rental market to choose from (50% vs 21%)
- has cheaper rent ($350/wk vs $400/wk)
- But Kalinga leaves renters under less rental stress (11% vs 17%)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Wooloowin
ahead on 2 of the 4 things we measure here
- gets more of its commuters onto trains and trams (14% vs 7%)
- is more walkable (94/100 vs 79/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Wooloowin
ahead on 2 of the 5 things we measure here
- has more units and townhouses to downsize into (54% vs 11%)
- is more walkable (94/100 vs 79/100)
- But Kalinga carries lower crime risk (32/100 vs 57/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Too close to call
Nothing among the 1 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Kalinga and Wooloowin drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Wooloowin has more residents (4,029 vs 2,144); Kalinga has higher household incomes ($192,244 vs $109,876).
| Kalinga | Wooloowin | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,144 | 4,029 +88% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +0.8% | +2.3% |
| Median age | 39 | 35 |
| Median household income | $192,244/yr +43% vs other | $109,876/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $400/wk +12% vs other | $350/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (21.3%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (25.2%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (4.6%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Kalinga | Wooloowin | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $2,115,000 | $1,705,000 |
| Median unit price | $610,000 | $747,000 |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 24 days from 14 sales | 15 days from 23 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
11 vs 24 sales
6 vs 10 sales
Development activity
| Kalinga | Wooloowin | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 9,382 across Brisbane same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | +9% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Kalinga | Wooloowin | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | — same for both | |
| Units | — | 3.3% $520/wk on $818K |
Ranking within QLD
| Kalinga | Wooloowin | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 99% of QLD | Higher than 81% of QLD |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 95% of QLD | Higher than 100% of QLD |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 96% of QLD same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 83% of QLD | Higher than 91% of QLD |
| Rental yield (units) | — | Higher than 8% of QLD |
Liveability
Wooloowin is more walkable (94 vs 79); Kalinga scores higher overall (92 vs 85).
| Kalinga | Wooloowin | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | A+ same for both | |
| Score | 92/100 | 85/100 |
| Socio-economic band | very advantaged area decile 10/10 same for both | |
Risk profile
Wooloowin carries more crime risk (57 vs 32).
| Kalinga | Wooloowin | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Crime | Low 32/100 | Moderate 57/100 |
| Flood | — same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 12 within 5 km | 9 within 5 km |
Schools
| Kalinga | Wooloowin | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 | 2 |
| Rated above peers | 0 | 1 |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 | 1 |
| Universities within 10 km | 3 Australian Catholic University-Brisbane Campus, 4.9 km | 3 90 Bowen Terrace, Fortitude Valley QLD 4006, 4.2 km |
| Full-time students aged 15–24 | 3.0% | 3.3% |
Schools in Kalinga
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Schools in Wooloowin
- Wooloowin State School Government · Primary above peers
- Holy Cross School Catholic · Primary below peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Kalinga | Wooloowin | |
|---|---|---|
| Cafes & restaurants | 1 | 5 |
| Parks & reserves | 7 | 1 |
| Childcare | 1 | 5 |
| Fuel stations | 2 | 0 |
| Waterways | 6 | 0 |
Mobility
| Kalinga | Wooloowin | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 79/100 | 94/100 |
| Distance to Brisbane | 8.1 km +15% vs other | 6.9 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 16 min | 14 min |
| Public transport score | 77/100 Bus | 91/100 Rail · Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 53.2 7-9am + 5-7pm | 54.0 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 1 min scheduled, not actual same for both | |
| Electric vehicle share | 2.5% postcode 4030 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 25 postcode 4030 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (49.6%).
Setting
| Kalinga | Wooloowin | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 14 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 23 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 7.4 km 2.6 km to a named beach | 7.7 km 1.8 km to a named beach |
NBN connectivity
| Kalinga | Wooloowin | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 74/100 | 80/100 |
| Most common technology | Hybrid fibre-coaxial same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 832 premises | 14% 2,063 premises |
Climate
| Kalinga | Wooloowin | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 1,032 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 30.5°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 8.9°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Kalinga | Wooloowin | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 5.3 µg/m³ | 5.4 µg/m³ |
| PM10 | 15.0 µg/m³ | 14.7 µg/m³ |
| NO₂ | 0.68 pphm | — |
Council rates
| Kalinga | Wooloowin | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,519/yr same for both | |
| Council | Brisbane same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Kalinga | Wooloowin | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Brisbane same for both | |
| Member | Madonna Jarrett same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Kalinga | Wooloowin | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $30,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Wooloowin
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Kalinga
Other comparisons with Wooloowin
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.