Jacobs Well vs Pimpama
Pimpama is the younger of the two, with a median age of 29 against 42 in Jacobs Well. In both, the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Jacobs Well, the large majority of households own their home and most households are couple families. In Pimpama, most households rent and about half of households are couple families. Houses cost more in Jacobs Well: a median of $1.23 million, against $960,000 in Pimpama, and rent is higher there too. On these figures, Pimpama tends to suit renters, young adults, and families with children.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Pimpama
ahead on 3 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more childcare (20 vs 0)
- has more schools inside the suburb (7 vs 0)
- has more parks and reserves (18 vs 5)
- But Jacobs Well has more separate houses rather than flats (98% vs 81%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Pimpama
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has cheaper houses ($960,000 vs $1,227,500)
- has cheaper land ($973,000 vs $1,125,000)
Weighs house prices, land prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Pimpama
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has a bigger rental market to choose from (58% vs 14%)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
They split
one each way, out of the 4 things we measure here
- Jacobs Well is more walkable (40/100 vs 17/100)
- Pimpama sits closer to the CBD (52.9 km vs 56.8 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
They split
one each way, out of the 5 things we measure here
- Jacobs Well is more walkable (40/100 vs 17/100)
- Pimpama has more units and townhouses to downsize into (19% vs 2%)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
They split
one each way, out of the 2 things we measure here
- Jacobs Well returns a higher gross yield on houses (4.8% vs 4.1%)
- Pimpama is growing faster (161.8% vs 56.7%)
Weighs house yield and population growth.
Where they sit
Jacobs Well and Pimpama drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Pimpama has more residents (24,601 vs 2,882); Jacobs Well skews older (42 vs 29).
| Jacobs Well | Pimpama | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,882 | 24,601 +754% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +56.7% | +161.8% |
| Median age | 42 | 29 |
| Median household income | $110,604/yr +12% vs other | $96,876/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $465/wk +5% vs other | $440/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (22.4%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (22.1%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (10.9%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Jacobs Well | Pimpama | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,227,500 | $960,000 |
| Median unit price | — | $737,000 |
| Median land price | $1,125,000 | $973,000 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 50 days from 58 sales | 23 days from 430 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
29 vs 122 sales
77 vs 432 sales
20 vs 26 sales
Development activity
| Jacobs Well | Pimpama | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 7,196 across Gold Coast same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -35% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Jacobs Well | Pimpama | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 4.8% $1,275/wk on $1.37M | 4.1% $750/wk on $950K |
| Units | — | 4.3% $695/wk on $850K |
Ranking within QLD
| Jacobs Well | Pimpama | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | — | Higher than 70% of QLD |
| Schools | — | Higher than 48% of QLD |
| Walkability | Higher than 84% of QLD | Higher than 77% of QLD |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 88% of QLD same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 95% of QLD | Higher than 96% of QLD |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 87% of QLD | Higher than 61% of QLD |
| Rental yield (units) | — | Higher than 42% of QLD |
Liveability
Jacobs Well is more walkable (40 vs 17); Jacobs Well scores higher overall (62 vs 50).
| Jacobs Well | Pimpama | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | B same for both | |
| Score | 62/100 | 50/100 |
| Socio-economic band | advantaged area decile 7/10 | mid-range socio-economic decile 5/10 |
Risk profile
| Jacobs Well | Pimpama | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Crime | Moderate 64/100 | Moderate 67/100 |
| Flood | — same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | Moderate 67/100 | None 0/100 |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 1 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Jacobs Well | Pimpama | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 | 7 |
| Rated above peers | 0 | 1 |
| Rated at peers | 0 | 4 |
| Rated below peers | 0 | 1 |
Schools in Jacobs Well
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Schools in Pimpama
- Pimpama State School Government · Primary above peers
- Lutheran Ormeau Rivers District School Independent · Combined at peers
- Ormeau State School Government · Primary at peers
- Pimpama State Primary College Government · Primary at peers
- Pimpama State Secondary College Government · Secondary at peers
- Gainsborough State School Government · Primary below peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Jacobs Well | Pimpama | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 1 | 5 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 1 | 11 |
| Parks & reserves | 5 | 18 |
| Childcare | 0 | 20 |
| GPs | 1 | 5 |
| Pharmacies | 1 | 2 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 0 | 2 |
| Fuel stations | 0 | 6 |
| EV chargers | 0 | 1 |
| Waterways | 0 | 7 |
Mobility
Jacobs Well sits further from the CBD (56.8 km vs 52.9 km).
| Jacobs Well | Pimpama | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 40/100 | 17/100 |
| Distance to Brisbane | 56.8 km +7% vs other | 52.9 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 49 min | 47 min |
| Public transport score | 56/100 Bus | 79/100 Rail · Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 15.0 7-9am + 5-7pm | 181.8 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 1 min scheduled, not actual | 0 min scheduled, not actual |
| Electric vehicle share | 1.3% postcode 4208 | 1.3% postcode 4209 |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 88 postcode 4208 | 61 postcode 4209 |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (79.7%).
Setting
| Jacobs Well | Pimpama | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 1 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 4 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 1.0 km | 6.2 km |
NBN connectivity
| Jacobs Well | Pimpama | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 90/100 | 93/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the premises same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 82% 1,707 premises | 87% 8,619 premises |
Climate
| Jacobs Well | Pimpama | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 1,351 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 28.9°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 12.5°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Jacobs Well | Pimpama | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 5.0 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 14.5 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.42 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Jacobs Well | Pimpama | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,298/yr same for both | |
| Council | Gold Coast same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Jacobs Well | Pimpama | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Fadden same for both | |
| Member | Cameron Caldwell same for both | |
| Party | Liberal National Party of Queensland same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Jacobs Well | Pimpama | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $30,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Jacobs Well
Other comparisons with Pimpama
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.