Jacobs Well vs Norwell
In both, most households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Jacobs Well, most households are couple families. Norwell is closer to the city centre: 50.4 km, against 56.8 km. On these figures, Jacobs Well tends to suit couples, while Norwell suits share households.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Jacobs Well
ahead on 3 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more parks and reserves (5 vs 0)
- carries lower crime risk (64/100 vs 91/100)
- is already more of a family suburb (74% vs 59%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Jacobs Well
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- leaves households under less mortgage stress (23% vs 30%)
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Norwell
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a bigger rental market to choose from (33% vs 14%)
- has cheaper rent ($300/wk vs $465/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Norwell
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- has a shorter drive in (43 min vs 49 min)
- sits closer to the CBD (50.4 km vs 56.8 km)
- But Jacobs Well is more walkable (40/100 vs 0/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Jacobs Well
ahead on 2 of the 4 things we measure here
- is more walkable (40/100 vs 0/100)
- carries lower crime risk (64/100 vs 91/100)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Jacobs Well
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (56.7% vs -5.5%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Jacobs Well and Norwell drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Jacobs Well has more residents (2,882 vs 189); Jacobs Well rents higher ($465/wk vs $300/wk).
| Jacobs Well | Norwell | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 2,882 +93% vs other | 189 |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +56.7% | -5.5% |
| Median age | 42 | 43 |
| Median household income | $110,604/yr +27% vs other | $81,224/yr |
| Median weekly rent | $465/wk +35% vs other | $300/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (16.9%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (7.6%).
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (22.1%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Jacobs Well | Norwell | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,227,500 | — |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | $1,125,000 | — |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 50 days from 58 sales | — |
Development activity
| Jacobs Well | Norwell | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 7,196 across Gold Coast same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -35% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Jacobs Well | Norwell | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 4.8% $1,275/wk on $1.37M | — |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within QLD
| Jacobs Well | Norwell | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | — | Higher than 52% of QLD |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 84% of QLD | Higher than 28% of QLD |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 88% of QLD same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 95% of QLD | Higher than 55% of QLD |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 87% of QLD | — |
Liveability
Jacobs Well is more walkable (40 vs 0).
| Jacobs Well | Norwell | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | B | — |
| Score | 62/100 | — |
| Socio-economic band | advantaged area decile 7/10 | below-average income decile 2/10 |
Risk profile
Norwell carries more crime risk (91 vs 64).
| Jacobs Well | Norwell | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Crime | Moderate 64/100 | High 91/100 |
| Flood | — same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | Moderate 67/100 | None 0/100 |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 1 within 5 km | 2 within 5 km |
Schools
| Jacobs Well | Norwell | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Jacobs Well | Norwell | |
|---|---|---|
| Supermarkets | 1 | 0 |
| Cafes & restaurants | 1 | 0 |
| Parks & reserves | 5 | 0 |
| Childcare | 0 | 1 |
| GPs | 1 | 0 |
| Pharmacies | 1 | 0 |
| Waterways | 0 | 1 |
Mobility
Jacobs Well sits further from the CBD (56.8 km vs 50.4 km).
| Jacobs Well | Norwell | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 40/100 | 0/100 |
| Distance to Brisbane | 56.8 km +11% vs other | 50.4 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 49 min | 43 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 1.3% postcode 4208 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 88 postcode 4208 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (76.9%).
Setting
| Jacobs Well | Norwell | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 1 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 2 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 1.0 km | 4.8 km |
NBN connectivity
| Jacobs Well | Norwell | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 90/100 | 30/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the premises | Fixed wireless |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 82% 1,707 premises | 0% 90 premises |
Climate
| Jacobs Well | Norwell | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 1,351 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 28.9°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 12.5°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Jacobs Well | Norwell | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 5.0 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 14.5 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.42 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Jacobs Well | Norwell | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,298/yr same for both | |
| Council | Gold Coast same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Jacobs Well | Norwell | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Fadden same for both | |
| Member | Cameron Caldwell same for both | |
| Party | Liberal National Party of Queensland same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Jacobs Well | Norwell | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $30,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Jacobs Well
Other comparisons with Norwell
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.