Jacka vs Moncrieff
In both, most households own their home and most households are couple families. Houses cost more in Jacka: a median of $1.25 million, against $1.08 million in Moncrieff. Moncrieff is closer to the city centre: 16.7 km, against 19.1 km. On these figures, Moncrieff tends to suit couples.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Moncrieff
ahead on 4 of the 6 things we measure here
- has more parks and reserves (3 vs 0)
- carries lower crime risk (40/100 vs 50/100)
- has more separate houses rather than flats (55% vs 45%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Moncrieff
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper houses ($1,084,000 vs $1,250,000)
Weighs house prices, unit prices, and mortgage stress.
Renters
Too close to call
Nothing among the 3 things we measure here separates them by enough to be worth acting on.
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Moncrieff
ahead on 2 of the 4 things we measure here
- is more walkable (57/100 vs 19/100)
- sits closer to the CBD (16.7 km vs 19.1 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, rail access, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Moncrieff
ahead on 2 of the 5 things we measure here
- is more walkable (57/100 vs 19/100)
- carries lower crime risk (40/100 vs 50/100)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Moncrieff
ahead on 2 of the 2 things we measure here
- is growing faster (4957.1% vs 6.3%)
- returns a higher gross yield on houses (4.8% vs 3.9%)
Weighs house yield and population growth.
Where they sit
Jacka and Moncrieff drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Moncrieff has more residents (5,310 vs 712); Moncrieff has higher household incomes ($140,348 vs $112,320).
| Jacka | Moncrieff | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 712 | 5,310 +646% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +6.3% | +4957.1% |
| Median age | 30 same for both | |
| Median household income | $112,320/yr | $140,348/yr +25% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $450/wk | $470/wk +4% vs other |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (23.5%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (18.9%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (14.3%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Jacka | Moncrieff | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $1,250,000 | $1,084,000 |
| Median unit price | $611,000 | $638,000 |
| Median land price | $650,000 | — |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | 47 days from 20 sales | 22 days from 42 sales |
House price by bedroom count
Only bed counts both suburbs published enough sales for. Sale counts are shown because the buckets differ in depth.
6 vs 21 sales
24 vs 51 sales
Development activity
| Jacka | Moncrieff | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 3,750 across Unincorporated ACT same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -48% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Jacka | Moncrieff | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 3.9% $970/wk on $1.3M | 4.8% $695/wk on $759K |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within ACT
| Jacka | Moncrieff | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 21% of ACT | Higher than 79% of ACT |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 13% of ACT | Higher than 41% of ACT |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 56% of ACT | Higher than 59% of ACT |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 89% of ACT | Higher than 100% of ACT |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 26% of ACT | Higher than 84% of ACT |
Liveability
Moncrieff is more walkable (57 vs 19); Moncrieff scores higher overall (38 vs 19).
| Jacka | Moncrieff | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | D | C |
| Score | 19/100 | 38/100 |
| Socio-economic band | advantaged area decile 8/10 | very advantaged area decile 10/10 |
Risk profile
Moncrieff carries more flood risk (20 vs 0); Jacka carries more crime risk (50 vs 40).
| Jacka | Moncrieff | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | High 92/100 | High 94/100 |
| Crime | Moderate 50/100 | Moderate 40/100 |
| Flood | None 0/100 | Low 20/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Jacka | Moncrieff | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 | 1 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
| Universities within 10 km | None | 1 UC - Canberra, Bruce, 9.9 km |
Schools in Jacka
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Schools in Moncrieff
- Taqwa School Independent · Combined
Amenities in the suburb
| Jacka | Moncrieff | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 0 | 3 |
| Waterways | 1 same for both | |
Mobility
Jacka sits further from the CBD (19.1 km vs 16.7 km).
| Jacka | Moncrieff | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 19/100 | 57/100 |
| Distance to Canberra | 19.1 km +13% vs other | 16.7 km |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 28 min | 25 min |
| Public transport score | 31/100 Bus | 72/100 Bus |
| Peak arrivals per hour | 3.5 7-9am + 5-7pm | 24.2 7-9am + 5-7pm |
| Median peak wait | 10 min scheduled, not actual | 2 min scheduled, not actual |
| Electric vehicle share | 3.7% postcode 2914 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 47 postcode 2914 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (78.0%).
Setting
| Jacka | Moncrieff | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 645 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 647 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Jacka | Moncrieff | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 100/100 same for both | |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the premises same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 100% 255 premises | 100% 1,758 premises |
Climate
| Jacka | Moncrieff | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 622 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | 28.5°C same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | 0.8°C same for both | |
Air quality (annual mean)
| Jacka | Moncrieff | |
|---|---|---|
| PM2.5 | 6.6 µg/m³ same for both | |
| PM10 | 11.0 µg/m³ same for both | |
| NO₂ | 0.41 pphm same for both | |
Council rates
| Jacka | Moncrieff | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $3,105/yr same for both | |
| Council | Unincorporated ACT same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Jacka | Moncrieff | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Fenner same for both | |
| Member | Andrew Leigh same for both | |
| Party | Australian Labor Party same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Jacka | Moncrieff | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | Not offered same for both | |
| Property price cap | — same for both | |
| Eligibility | None same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Jacka
Other comparisons with Moncrieff
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.