Innot Hot Springs vs Mount Garnet
Mount Garnet is the younger of the two, with a median age of 50 against 57 in Innot Hot Springs. In both, most households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Innot Hot Springs, most households are people living alone. On these figures, Innot Hot Springs tends to suit people living alone.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
Mount Garnet
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is already more of a family suburb (48% vs 31%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Innot Hot Springs
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- leaves households under less mortgage stress (8% vs 20%)
Weighs mortgage stress.
Renters
Mount Garnet
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- leaves renters under less rental stress (20% vs 25%)
- has cheaper rent ($185/wk vs $200/wk)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Innot Hot Springs
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- sits closer to the CBD (1721.6 km vs 1789.1 km)
- has a shorter drive in (1206 min vs 1228 min)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Innot Hot Springs
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has more residents already 65 and over (29% vs 24%)
Weighs smaller dwellings, who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Mount Garnet
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (23.7% vs 6.8%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Innot Hot Springs and Mount Garnet drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Mount Garnet has more residents (532 vs 189); Mount Garnet has higher household incomes ($47,892 vs $40,924).
| Innot Hot Springs | Mount Garnet | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 189 | 532 +181% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +6.8% | +23.7% |
| Median age | 57 | 50 |
| Median household income | $40,924/yr | $47,892/yr +17% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $200/wk +8% vs other | $185/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (23.8%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (13.2%).
Property market
| Innot Hot Springs | Mount Garnet | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | — | $250,000 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — same for both | |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | — | 196 days from 6 sales |
Development activity
| Innot Hot Springs | Mount Garnet | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 167 across Tablelands same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -80% same for both | |
Ranking within QLD
| Innot Hot Springs | Mount Garnet | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 5% of QLD | Higher than 10% of QLD |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 65% of QLD | Higher than 22% of QLD |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 13% of QLD same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 27% of QLD | Higher than 43% of QLD |
Liveability
| Innot Hot Springs | Mount Garnet | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — | D |
| Score | — | 19/100 |
| Socio-economic band | high-need area decile 1/10 same for both | |
Risk profile
Innot Hot Springs carries more bushfire risk (36 vs 0).
| Innot Hot Springs | Mount Garnet | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Low 36/100 | None 0/100 |
| Crime | High 82/100 | High 75/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Innot Hot Springs | Mount Garnet | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 | 1 |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 | 1 |
Schools in Innot Hot Springs
No schools recorded inside this suburb's boundary. Children here will be zoned to schools nearby.
Schools in Mount Garnet
- Mount Garnet State School Government · Primary below peers
Amenities in the suburb
| Innot Hot Springs | Mount Garnet | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 0 | 2 |
| Childcare | 0 | 1 |
| GPs | 0 | 1 |
| Police stations | 0 | 1 |
| Banks & Bank@Post | 0 | 1 |
| Fuel stations | 1 | 2 |
| Waterways | 19 | 6 |
Mobility
Mount Garnet sits further from the CBD (1789.1 km vs 1721.6 km).
| Innot Hot Springs | Mount Garnet | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 same for both | |
| Distance to Brisbane | 1721.6 km | 1789.1 km +4% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 1206 min | 1228 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.1% postcode 4872 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 55 postcode 4872 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (58.3%).
Setting
| Innot Hot Springs | Mount Garnet | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 653 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 756 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
NBN connectivity
| Innot Hot Springs | Mount Garnet | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 19/100 | 29/100 |
| Most common technology | Satellite (Sky Muster) | Fixed wireless |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 92 premises | 0% 238 premises |
Council rates
| Innot Hot Springs | Mount Garnet | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,609/yr same for both | |
| Council | Tablelands same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Innot Hot Springs | Mount Garnet | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Kennedy same for both | |
| Member | Bob Katter same for both | |
| Party | Katter's Australian Party (KAP) same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Innot Hot Springs | Mount Garnet | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $30,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $750,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Mount Garnet
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Innot Hot Springs
Other comparisons with Mount Garnet
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.