Inman Valley vs Lower Inman Valley
Lower Inman Valley is the younger of the two, with a median age of 50 against 54 in Inman Valley. In both, the large majority of households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Lower Inman Valley, most households are couple families. Houses cost more in Lower Inman Valley: a median of $1.31 million, against $975,000 in Inman Valley. On these figures, Inman Valley tends to suit buyers on a tighter budget, while Lower Inman Valley suits couples.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
They split
one each way, out of the 6 things we measure here
- Inman Valley has more parks and reserves (32 vs 1)
- Lower Inman Valley carries lower crime risk (14/100 vs 52/100)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Inman Valley
ahead on 2 of the 2 things we measure here
- has cheaper houses ($975,000 vs $1,309,000)
- leaves households under less mortgage stress (19% vs 26%)
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
Lower Inman Valley
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- leaves renters under less rental stress (15% vs 21%)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
They split
one each way, out of the 3 things we measure here
- Inman Valley sits closer to the CBD (85.8 km vs 91.2 km)
- Lower Inman Valley is more walkable (10/100 vs 0/100)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Lower Inman Valley
ahead on 2 of the 4 things we measure here
- is more walkable (10/100 vs 0/100)
- carries lower crime risk (14/100 vs 52/100)
- But Inman Valley has more residents already 65 and over (28% vs 22%)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Lower Inman Valley
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (15.1% vs 5.2%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Inman Valley and Lower Inman Valley drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Lower Inman Valley has more residents (517 vs 361); Lower Inman Valley has higher household incomes ($94,224 vs $67,964).
| Inman Valley | Lower Inman Valley | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 361 | 517 +43% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +5.2% | +15.1% |
| Median age | 54 | 50 |
| Median household income | $67,964/yr | $94,224/yr +39% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $273/wk +3% vs other | $265/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (21.6%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (8.6%).
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (18.2%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Inman Valley | Lower Inman Valley | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $975,000 | $1,309,000 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — | $1,030,000 |
Zoning mix
| Inman Valley | Lower Inman Valley | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 97% | 100% |
| Environmental | 3% | 0% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Inman Valley | Lower Inman Valley | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 58 across Yankalilla | 347 across Victor Harbor |
| Approvals change year on year | -55% | -26% |
Ranking within SA
| Inman Valley | Lower Inman Valley | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | — same for both | |
| Income | Higher than 36% of SA | Higher than 73% of SA |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 38% of SA | Higher than 64% of SA |
| Affordability | — same for both | |
| EV adoption | Higher than 63% of SA same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 48% of SA | Higher than 63% of SA |
Liveability
Lower Inman Valley is more walkable (10 vs 0).
| Inman Valley | Lower Inman Valley | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — | B |
| Score | — | 61/100 |
| Socio-economic band | mid-range socio-economic decile 6/10 | advantaged area decile 8/10 |
Risk profile
Inman Valley carries more bushfire risk (29 vs 0); Inman Valley carries more crime risk (52 vs 14).
| Inman Valley | Lower Inman Valley | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | Low 29/100 | None 0/100 |
| Crime | Moderate 52/100 | Low 14/100 |
| Flood | — | Low 29/100 |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km | 2 within 5 km |
Schools
| Inman Valley | Lower Inman Valley | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Inman Valley | Lower Inman Valley | |
|---|---|---|
| Cafes & restaurants | 1 | 0 |
| Parks & reserves | 32 | 1 |
| Waterways | 0 | 1 |
Mobility
Lower Inman Valley sits further from the CBD (91.2 km vs 85.8 km).
| Inman Valley | Lower Inman Valley | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 0/100 | 10/100 |
| Distance to Adelaide | 85.8 km | 91.2 km +6% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 80 min | 81 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.7% postcode 5211 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 70 postcode 5211 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (76.8%).
Setting
| Inman Valley | Lower Inman Valley | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 111 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 101 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 14.4 km | 6.5 km |
NBN connectivity
| Inman Valley | Lower Inman Valley | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 29/100 | 30/100 |
| Most common technology | Fixed wireless same for both | |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 0% 212 premises | 0% 207 premises |
Climate
| Inman Valley | Lower Inman Valley | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual rainfall | 786 mm same for both | |
| Summer max (Jan) | — same for both | |
| Winter min (Jul) | — same for both | |
Council rates
| Inman Valley | Lower Inman Valley | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $2,546/yr | $2,533/yr |
| Council | Yankalilla | Victor Harbor |
Federal electorate
| Inman Valley | Lower Inman Valley | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Mayo same for both | |
| Member | Rebekha Sharkie same for both | |
| Party | Centre Alliance same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Inman Valley | Lower Inman Valley | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $15,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | — same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Inman Valley
Other comparisons with Lower Inman Valley
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.