Hyland Park vs Valla
In both, most households own their home and the large majority of homes are detached houses. In Hyland Park, about half of households are people living alone. In Valla, about half of households are couple families. Houses cost more in Valla: a median of $1.34 million, against $752,000 in Hyland Park, though rent is higher in Hyland Park. On these figures, Hyland Park tends to suit people living alone and buyers on a tighter budget, while Valla suits couples.
Which one suits you?
There is no overall winner — the suburb that suits a family with school-age kids is routinely the wrong one for someone commuting into the city. So each of these answers its own question, against a checklist you can see, using the same figures in the tables below.
Families with school-age kids
They split
one each way, out of the 6 things we measure here
- Hyland Park carries lower crime risk (53/100 vs 70/100)
- Valla is already more of a family suburb (62% vs 51%)
Weighs schools, house stock, crime, parks, childcare, and who already lives there.
First-home buyers
Hyland Park
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- has cheaper houses ($752,500 vs $1,340,000)
Weighs house prices and mortgage stress.
Renters
Valla
ahead on 2 of the 3 things we measure here
- leaves renters under less rental stress (19% vs 35%)
- has cheaper rent ($310/wk vs $350/wk)
- But Hyland Park has a bigger rental market to choose from (26% vs 10%)
Weighs rent, rental stress, and how much is for rent.
Commuting to the city
Hyland Park
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- sits closer to the CBD (488.2 km vs 493.1 km)
Weighs distance, drive time, and walkability.
Downsizers and retirees
Hyland Park
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- carries lower crime risk (53/100 vs 70/100)
Weighs who already lives there, GPs, walkability, and crime.
Investors
Valla
ahead on the one thing that separates them
- is growing faster (12.4% vs 2.6%)
Weighs population growth.
Where they sit
Hyland Park and Valla drawn to the same scale. Both outlines are shown together, so the map answers whether they share a border and how their areas compare.
Bars start at zero. Scores, risks and rankings are drawn against their full 0–100 range; other rows are drawn in proportion to the larger of the two.
Side by side, out of 100
Risks are inverted — shown as safety and low exposure — so a longer bar always means better.
Demographics
Valla has more residents (1,052 vs 440); Valla has higher household incomes ($84,084 vs $51,428).
| Hyland Park | Valla | |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 440 | 1,052 +139% vs other |
| Population trend (2016 → 2021) | +2.6% | +12.4% |
| Median age | 49 | 48 |
| Median household income | $51,428/yr | $84,084/yr +63% vs other |
| Median weekly rent | $350/wk +11% vs other | $310/wk |
Age profile
Share of residents in each band, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (21.2%).
Who lives together
Household composition, 2021 Census.
Who owns and who rents
Occupied private dwellings by tenure, 2021 Census.
Qualifications
Highest non-school qualification, residents 15+, 2021 Census.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (21.4%).
Where residents were born
Largest overseas birthplaces, as a share of all residents, 2021 Census. A dash means that country is not among the suburb's own eight largest.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (4.8%).
What people live in
Occupied private dwellings by structure, 2021 Census.
Property market
| Hyland Park | Valla | |
|---|---|---|
| Median house price | $752,500 | $1,340,000 |
| Median unit price | — same for both | |
| Median land price | — | $732,500 |
| Typical days to sell (houses) | — | 53 days from 8 sales |
Zoning mix
Valla has more rural and farming land (84% vs 1%); Hyland Park has more land zoned for conservation (38% vs 8%).
| Hyland Park | Valla | |
|---|---|---|
| Rural and farming | 1% | 84% |
| Residential | 46% | 6% |
| Environmental | 38% | 8% |
| Parks and recreation | 15% | 0% |
| Infrastructure and transport | 0% | 1% |
| Zoning sets what may be built, not what is there today. A single address can sit in a different zone to the suburb around it. Zones as at 2026-09. | ||
Development activity
| Hyland Park | Valla | |
|---|---|---|
| New dwellings approved | 109 across Nambucca Valley same for both | |
| Approvals change year on year | -64% same for both | |
Gross rental yield
| Hyland Park | Valla | |
|---|---|---|
| Houses | 3.1% $560/wk on $936K | — |
| Units | — same for both | |
Ranking within NSW
| Hyland Park | Valla | |
|---|---|---|
| House price | Higher than 29% of NSW | Higher than 66% of NSW |
| Income | Higher than 12% of NSW | Higher than 51% of NSW |
| Schools | — same for both | |
| Walkability | Higher than 62% of NSW | Higher than 55% of NSW |
| Affordability | Higher than 36% of NSW | Higher than 34% of NSW |
| EV adoption | Higher than 30% of NSW same for both | |
| NBN connectivity | Higher than 87% of NSW | Higher than 49% of NSW |
| Rental yield (houses) | Higher than 26% of NSW | — |
Liveability
| Hyland Park | Valla | |
|---|---|---|
| Grade | — | D |
| Score | — | 29/100 |
| Socio-economic band | below-average income decile 2/10 | mid-range socio-economic decile 6/10 |
Risk profile
Valla carries more bushfire risk (45 vs 0); Valla carries more crime risk (70 vs 53).
| Hyland Park | Valla | |
|---|---|---|
| Bushfire | None 0/100 | Moderate 45/100 |
| Crime | Moderate 53/100 | High 70/100 |
| Flood | Not mapped no mapped data here same for both | |
| Coastal erosion | None 0/100 | Low 39/100 |
| Aircraft noise | None 0/100 same for both | |
| Industrial facilities nearby | 0 within 5 km same for both | |
Schools
| Hyland Park | Valla | |
|---|---|---|
| Inside the suburb | 0 same for both | |
| Rated above peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated at peers | 0 same for both | |
| Rated below peers | 0 same for both | |
Amenities in the suburb
| Hyland Park | Valla | |
|---|---|---|
| Parks & reserves | 0 | 1 |
| Fuel stations | 0 | 1 |
| Waterways | 0 | 40 |
Mobility
Valla sits further from the CBD (493.1 km vs 488.2 km).
| Hyland Park | Valla | |
|---|---|---|
| Walkability score | 13/100 | 8/100 |
| Distance to Sydney | 488.2 km | 493.1 km +1% vs other |
| Drive time (normal traffic) | 320 min | 323 min |
| Electric vehicle share | 0.3% postcode 2448 same for both | |
| Rooftop solar per 100 dwellings | 53 postcode 2448 same for both | |
How people get to work
Method of travel on census day 2021 — which fell during COVID restrictions, so working from home is inflated and every travel mode understated.
Bars are drawn against the largest share shown (75.8%).
Setting
| Hyland Park | Valla | |
|---|---|---|
| Elevation | 9 m above sea level, at the suburb centre | 40 m above sea level, at the suburb centre |
| Distance to the ocean | 1.1 km 1.1 km to a named beach | 5.7 km |
NBN connectivity
| Hyland Park | Valla | |
|---|---|---|
| Connectivity score | 77/100 | 29/100 |
| Most common technology | Fibre to the premises | Fixed wireless |
| Full-fibre (FTTP) share | 56% 240 premises | 0% 399 premises |
Council rates
| Hyland Park | Valla | |
|---|---|---|
| Average residential rate | $1,175/yr same for both | |
| Council | Nambucca Valley same for both | |
Federal electorate
| Hyland Park | Valla | |
|---|---|---|
| Division | Cowper same for both | |
| Member | Pat Conaghan same for both | |
| Party | The Nationals same for both | |
First Home Owner Grant
| Hyland Park | Valla | |
|---|---|---|
| Grant amount | $10,000 same for both | |
| Property price cap | $600,000 same for both | |
| Eligibility | New same for both | |
Tags
Hyland Park
Valla
More comparisons
Other comparisons with Hyland Park
Other comparisons with Valla
Information shown is provided as-is from Australian government and commercial data sources.
Always verify with the relevant authority before making property decisions.
See Data Sources and How We Calculate for details.